Marco Rubio’s budget ideas don’t add up

WASHINGTON — Marco Rubio’s toughest political opponent may be math.

That’s because his economic agenda has a simple arithmetic problem. He wants to balance the budget – in fact, he wants to amend the Constitution to make that mandatory – but at the same time he wants to cut taxes by $4 trillion or so, increase defense spending, and keep antipoverty spending where it is. That doesn’t leave a lot of places to find savings. There probably aren’t any in non-defense discretionary spending — things like roads and research — when it’s already at a 40-year low. So you’d have to get them all by cutting Social Security and Medicare, and cutting them now. Rubio, though, only wants to “reform” entitlements for future seniors, not current ones. And that leaves you with big, fat deficits for a good, long while.

This is the same problem Republicans have had for 35 years now. That’s how long they’ve been running on deficit-financed tax cuts and fiscal responsibility. So Rubio, who’s trying to portray himself as a new kind of Republican, is seizing on the only thing that makes that combination work: saying tax cuts will pay for themselves. Specifically, he’s said that the way to balance the budget is with “dynamic economic growth,” which, of course, his tax cuts are supposed to provide.

That’s saying you can eat your cake and have it too, because eating it will make more of it appear. But anyone who remembers the big deficits that came after Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush’s big tax cuts knows that’s not the case. Indeed, former Bush adviser Greg Mankiw knew this himself, calling people who said otherwise little more than “charlatans and cranks.”

But that hasn’t stopped the usual supply-side suspects, like the right-leaning Tax Foundation, from claiming that Rubio’s trillions of dollars of tax cuts would actually make tax revenues go up a trillion dollars over 10 years by supercharging growth so much. If this sounds like wishful thinking masquerading as actual analysis, well, you’re in touch with empirical reality. “This would not pass muster,” economist Laurence Kotlikoff told The New York Times’s Josh Barro, “as an undergraduate model at a top university.” Though those last four words might not be necessary.

It’s a case of fiscal dissonance. Republicans think tax cuts are the solution to everything, but they also think the debt is one of our biggest problems. The only way to make this compute is to cut spending more than you cut taxes. That’s what Paul Ryan, for example, has proposed in his budgets, which would cut safety net and non-defense discretionary spending down to almost nothing.

The problem here, though, is that specific government programs are a lot more popular than government in the abstract. Voters, in other words, might say that they want smaller government, but not if that means, well, actually making the government smaller by slashing Medicaid and research and development spending. Besides, it’s bad politics to make the trade-off between more tax cuts for the rich and less spending for the poor more explicit. That would make a lot of voters think the Republicans don’t care about people like them, which Rubio doesn’t want to doom the party in 2016 as it did in 2012.

So Rubio’s taken what Jim Pethokoukis of the American Enterprise Institute calls “the Oprah theory of tax cuts” — you get a tax cut, and you get a tax cut, and we all get a tax cut — and applied it to spending, too. Everybody gets what they want today, and all the sacrifices come, say, eight years down the road when Rubio would be out of office. It’s what George W. Bush did.

You can’t repeal and replace math.

O’Brien is a reporter for Wonkblog covering economic affairs. He was previously a senior associate editor at The Atlantic.

More in Local News

No flashing lights planned for giant Port of Everett cranes

The Port sought public input on making them blue and adding lights or keeping them as they were.

Gun-ammunition bill is suffocated by GOP amendments

It’s Day 40 of 60 of the 2020 session of the Washington Legislature in Olympia.

Edmonds School District leaders plan for another school bond

It won’t be in April, but the district could float another bond proposal in August or November.

Meet the newest Daily Herald reporter, Rachel Riley

In this episode of “Herald Headlines,” Executive Editor Phil O’Connor interviews a new staffer.

Boeing asks that its big state tax break be suspended

The company hopes the move will resolve a trade dispute involving European rival Airbus.

Will Boy Scout bankruptcy sweep abuse cases under the rug?

38 scouting officials in Washington were known to be a danger to kids, including one in Everett.

South Lynnwood Park to get $2.5 million renovation

A new soccer field, covered picnic area and accessibility upgrades are among the improvements.

3 choices: How Swift, light rail should hook up in Shoreline

Do you prefer the 185th street corridor, the Aurora Transit Center or decongestion?

Nation’s first coronavirus patient said to be fully recovered

The Snohomish Health District has released the man from home isolation.

Most Read