LONDON – New research bolsters a growing body of evidence that an increasing proportion of women in the industrialized world are choosing to give birth by Caesarean section when there is no clear medical need.
A Caesarean section is major abdominal surgery with serious potential side effects. So the question of whether it should be performed when natural childbirth poses no threat to either mother or baby is controversial among obstetricians.
However, there have been few studies comparing C-sections with natural childbirth on the question of which is better for the baby, or mother.
Caesarean sections are still uncommon, but a study published this week in the British Medical Journal has found that the rate of elective C-section among American expectant mothers with uncomplicated pregnancies has increased by 67 percent since 1991, with a gradual rise from 1991 to 1996 and a rapid one thereafter.
The researchers, from Boston University in the United States, analyzed U.S. national birth certificate data and found that in 2001, there were 80,028 elective Caesarean sections performed in cases where there was no clear medical need.
That’s a tiny fraction of America’s 4 million annual births, but more than triple the 25,162 elective C-sections recorded in 1996.
Older mothers having their first child were the most likely to opt for a medically unnecessary C-section, the study found. Almost one-fifth of first-time mothers over 34 had such a delivery in 2001.
But the rate also grew among expectant mothers under 30, with 5 percent of them now having elective C-sections, the study found.
Side effects, which can be life-threatening, include hemorrhage, infection, infertility and blood clots. Possibly more important, one C-section brings even more risks to future pregnancies.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
