WASHINGTON – More than half of car seats do a poor job of preventing whiplash injury because of the way they are built, according to tests by the insurance industry.
General Motors Corp. cars were among the worst performers, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety said in results released Sunday. Volvo and Saab cars were among the best.
Whiplash happens when a vehicle is hit from behind and the seat propels forward. If the headrest does not move with the seat, the occupant’s neck will bend back and stretch.
Neck injuries sustained in a rear-end crash rarely are life-threatening, but they happen frequently and can be painful and expensive. Neck injuries cost around $7 billion in insurance claims each year, the institute said.
The institute examined 97 seat and headrest combinations found in 88 cars now on the market. It tested 73 of those seats in a 20 mph rear-impact crash to see how well they would protect an average-size male dummy.
Eight seats earned the institute’s highest rating, including those in the Volvo S40, S60 and S80, the Saab 9-2X and 9-3, and the Jaguar S-type.
Sixteen seats, including those in the Chevrolet Malibu and the Subaru Outback, got the second-highest rating of acceptable; 19 seats, including those in the Ford Focus and the Mini Cooper, earned the third-highest rating of marginal.
The other 30 received the institute’s worst rating, poor, indicating the highest likelihood of neck injury in a rear-impact crash. Among those were the seats in the Audi A4 and S4, the BMW 3 Series, the Dodge Neon and the Jaguar X-type.
The institute did not test 24 seats – among them those in the Buick Regal, Cadillac Seville, Acura RL and Volkswagen Passat – because it determined the headrests were designed in a way that would not protect taller people.
GM said in a statement that it has been following the institute’s guidelines for placement of headrests. The company also said it has led development of a headrest that moves according to the force of the crash.
GM said occupants come in many sizes and sit in various positions in the vehicle and cautioned against making changes based on one test.
“If the test methods chosen are not reflective of reducing real-world harm, there could be significant potential to cause seat design changes that are directionally wrong,” GM said.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
