U.N. Security Council condemns North Korea nuke test

UNITED NATIONS — A united U.N. Security Council strongly condemned North Korea’s nuclear test and pledged further action Tuesday, calling Pyongyang’s latest defiant act “a clear threat to international peace and security.”

All 15 council members, including North Korea’s closest ally China, approved the press statement hours after the latest underground test. The statement called the atomic blast a “grave violation” of three U.N. resolutions that ban North Korea from conducting nuclear or missile tests.

The swift and unanimous response from the U.N.’s most powerful body set the stage for a fourth round of sanctions against Pyongyang.

The language in the statement, which pledged “significant action” in a new resolution, was stronger than the Security Council’s initial reaction to North Korea’s two previous nuclear tests and its most recent rocket launch. Diplomats said it reflects the growing anger at Pyongyang’s continuing defiance of the council and the sanctions resolutions.

How tough the new sanctions will be will depend largely on China, North Korea’s main trading partner. China has voted for the three previous sanctions resolutions but has resisted measures that would cut off the country’s economy completely.

U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice said a number of new measures to tighten and expand the existing sanctions regime will be discussed with council members and other concerned countries in the coming days. She added in response to a question that financial sanctions would be “right for appropriate further action.”

Tuesday’s nuclear test followed a familiar North Korean pattern. Pyongyang conducted its first two nuclear weapons tests weeks after rocket launches in 2006 and 2009, and this third test followed a rocket launch in December that the U.N. and the U.S. called a cover for a banned long-range missile test.

The Security Council noted that last month, in a resolution that strengthened sanctions in response to the December missile test, its members promised to take “significant action” in the event of a new nuclear test.

“In line with this commitment and the gravity of this violation, the members of the Security Council will begin work immediately on appropriate measures in a Security Council resolution,” the council said.

The statement was read by South Korea Foreign Minister Kim Sung-hwan, whose country holds the rotating Security Council presidency this month. South Korea was elected to the council for a two-year term starting in January.

“North Korea will be held responsible for any consequences of this provocative act,” Kim told reporters later.

Rice called the test “highly provocative” and said the North’s continued work on its nuclear and missile programs threatens regional and international peace and “the security of a number of countries including the United States.”

“They will not be tolerated,” she said, “and they will be met with North Korea’s increasing isolation and pressure under United Nations sanctions.”

“The U.N. Security Council must and will deliver a swift, credible and strong response by way of a Security Council resolution that further impedes the growth of DPRK’s nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs and its ability to engage in proliferation activity,” Rice said, using the initials of the North’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon welcomed the council statement and said he was encouraged by “the swift and overwhelming international condemnation of this wanton act.”

Ban, a former South Korean foreign minister, expressed regret that his repeated appeals to North Korea’s new young leader, Kim Jong Un, to give up its pursuit of nuclear weapons and address international concerns through dialogue “have fallen on deaf ears.”

North Korea is the only country to carry out nuclear tests in the 21st century, he said, and the latest test in defiance of the U.N. and the international community “is a serious challenge to global efforts to curb nuclear proliferation.”

Ban said he is also “profoundly concerned about the negative impact of this act on regional stability.”

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Local News

Logo for news use featuring Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
Health officials: Three confirmed measles cases in SnoCo over holidays

The visitors, all in the same family from South Carolina, went to multiple locations in Everett, Marysville and Mukilteo from Dec. 27-30.

Dog abandoned in Everett dumpster has new home and new name

Binny, now named Maisey, has a social media account where people can follow along with her adventures.

People try to navigate their cars along a flooded road near US 2 on Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2025, in Sultan, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Temporary flood assistance center to open in Sultan

Residents affected by December’s historic flooding can access multiple agencies and resources.

Logo for news use featuring the Tulalip Indian Reservation in Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
Teens accused of brutal attack on Tulalip man Monday

The man’s family says they are in disbelief after two teenagers allegedly assaulted the 63-year-old while he was starting work.

A sign notifying people of the new buffer zone around 41st Street in Everett on Wednesday, Jan. 7. (Will Geschke / The Herald)
Everett adds fifth ‘no sit, no lie’ buffer zone at 41st Street

The city implemented the zone in mid-December, soon after the city council extended a law allowing it to create the zones.

A view of the Eastview development looking south along 79th Avenue where mud and water runoff flowed due to rain on Oct. 16, 2025 in Snohomish, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Eastview Village critics seek appeal to overturn county’s decision

Petitioners, including two former county employees, are concerned the 144-acre project will cause unexamined consequences for unincorporated Snohomish County.

Snohomish County commuters: Get ready for more I-5 construction

Lanes will be reduced along northbound I-5 in Seattle throughout most of 2026 as WSDOT continues work on needed repairs to an aging bridge.

Logo for news use featuring the municipality of Snohomish in Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
Snohomish man held on bail for email threat against Gov. Ferguson, AG Brown

A district court pro tem judge, Kim McClay, set bail at $200,000 Monday after finding “substantial danger” that the suspect would act violently if released.

Kathy Johnson walks through vegetation growing along a CERCLA road in the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest on Thursday, July 10, 2025 in Granite Falls, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Activism groups to host forest defense meeting in Bothell

The League of Women Voters of Snohomish County and the Pacific Northwest Forest Climate Alliance will discuss efforts to protect public lands in Washington.

Debris shows the highest level the Snohomish River has reached on a flood level marker located along the base of the Todo Mexico building on First Street on Friday, Dec. 12, 2025 in Snohomish, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
SnoCo offers programs to assist in flood mitigation and recovery

Property owners in Snohomish County living in places affected by… Continue reading

x
Paraeducator at 2 Edmonds schools arrested on suspicion of child sex abuse

On Monday, Edmonds police arrested the 46-year-old after a student’s parents found inappropriate messages on their daughter’s phone.

Barbara and Anne Guthrie holds signs and wave at cars offloading from the ferry during South Snohomish County Indivisible’s Signs of Fascism protest on Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2026 in Edmonds, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
‘We do this for others’: Edmonds protests Trump administration

One year after President Trump’s inauguration, community members rallied against many of his policies, including an increase in immigration enforcement.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.