A fair minimum wage stokes economic growth

Earlier this month minimum-wage workers received some good news. Rather than seeing their minimum wage eroded by inflation, they will get a cost-of-living adjustment on Jan. 1. This 14 cent increase puts our minimum wage at $8.07, thanks to the wisdom of Washington voters almost a decade ago. In 1998, the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, took a great idea from Social Security — the annual cost of living adjustment — and grafted it onto our minimum wage. This was overwhelmingly supported through an initiative to the people that first raised the minimum wage and then tied it to inflation.

It is a good thing they did, since in that same time period, the federal minimum wage sat at $5.15 an hour and did not budge. You may remember all the coverage about Congress finally passing an increase in the minimum wage and George W. Bush grudgingly signing this increase into law. (He had to, if he wanted his money for the war in Iraq, since it was part of the war funding package.) The weird thing is that this action was so delinquent and the increase so small that it literally meant nothing for the vast majority of workers in our country. That’s because 30 states, following our example, already have minimum wages over the new federal minimum of $5.85.

One good thing about our state’s minimum wage announcement is that it wasn’t accompanied by the typical “woe-is-me” rhetoric from businesses about how this increase of 1.8 percent is going to wipe them out. Perhaps that’s because with the best minimum wage in the country, employers are seeing less worker turnover. That means lower costs for recruitment and training, and more productivity from workers who stay on the job and are committed to their work. “You get what you pay for” makes as much common sense when paying wages as it does when shopping for office furniture.

Of course, the minimum wage used to be a lot higher all across the country than it is now. Back in 1968, the minimum wage in 2007 dollars was $9.75. That is a fifth more than what it is now in our state, and two-fifths more than the federal minimum wage. Those of us who were alive in 1968 recall a booming economy, massive investment in public education and transportation, a strong union movement and a thriving middle class. A decent minimum wage was part of the package for widespread economic progress.

So it should be no surprise that this same ingredient is part of Washington’s current economic success. We have had three strong years of job growth, our median annual household income is $4,000 higher than the national median, our union membership is just about the highest in the country, and hourly wages have climbed in the last two years. And we have the best minimum wage in the nation.

It used to be that the increase in the minimum wage tracked increases in worker productivity. That makes sense: the increase in the value of goods and services should be shared between the people putting in their hours of work and the shareholders of various companies. Between 1947 and 1973, productivity increased 104 percent and the minimum wage increased in real dollars by 101 percent. From the high point of the minimum wage (1968) to the present, worker productivity has doubled. If the minimum wage had continued to track increases in productivity, it would be above $17 an hour. Of course, that didn’t happen. In fact, the stagnation of the minimum wage helped to drag down the average wage, which is one of the reasons we now have the growing disparity between the top one-fifth of Americans and the broad middle class.

When Jan. 1 arrives, and minimum wage workers, along with Social Security recipients, get a COLA (the cost-of-living adjustment), we can be proud of our state. We lead the nation in compensation for low-wage workers. Many other states will follow us, with California and Massachusetts at $8 an hour and Oregon at $7.95. Minimum wage workers deserve this inflation adjustment as much as any worker. In fact, looking back over the past 40 years, it is only a partial slice of equity for them.

John Burbank, executive director of the Economic Opportunity Institute (www.eoionline.org ), writes every other Wednesday. Write to him in care of the institute at 1900 Northlake Way, Suite 237, Seattle, WA 98103. His e-mail address is john@eoionline.org.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Feb. 8

A sketechy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Comment: Democracy depends on support of local journalism

A state bill provides funding to support local news outlets through a modest tax on tech businesses.

Comment: Love is intoxicating; romance doesn’t have to be

Navigating sobriety while dating, with Valentine’s Day coming up, is possible and fulfilling.

Comment: State attempt at single-payer health care bound to fail

Other states have tried, but balked when confronted with the immense cost to state taxpayers.

Forum: Requiem for a lost heavyweight: Sports Illustrated

SI, with Time and NatGeo, were a holy trinity for me and my dad. Now, it’s a world of AI clickbait.

Forum: Political leaders should leave trash talk to ballplayers

Verbal intimidation is one thing on the basketball court; it shouldn’t have a place in our politics.

The Buzz: Why, no, we have complete trust in Elon Musk

But whatever he and Trump are doing to the country, could they please wish it into the cornfield?

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Push back news desert with journalism support

A bill in the state Senate would tax big tech to support a hiring fund for local news outlets.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Feb. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.