ADA ruling a victory for common sense

A Supreme Court decision should allow America to regain better balance in its thinking about job-related disabilities.

On Monday, the court made it harder for workers to invoke the Americans with Disabilities Act to demand that employers make their jobs less physically demanding. The court decision is a triumph for common sense. It reads the landmark law the way it was intended by Congress, as a document protecting the rights of people with serious, long-term disabilities.

The ruling is also being viewed as a major victory for employers. That’s a reality, in the sense that it lifts some of the uncertainty about what companies must do to accommodate the needs of individual workers.

The court case, however, points out that there may be a need for legislation or rules that more specifically address work-place injuries and treatable conditions. The ruling involves a Kentucky woman with carpal tunnel syndrome, which developed while she worked at a Toyota assembly plant. Such serious problems, while falling short of a disability, need to be addressed adequately by workplace injury laws or other measures at the federal and state levels.

The Americans with Disabilities Act, though, is not the way to cover every imaginable physical problem. When the current U.S. Supreme Court speaks unanimously, there must be a very broad basis for agreement. And there is a consensus among conservative and liberal justices about the need to restrain the ever-expanding interpretations of ADA.

Almost everyone has some physical impairment. With a bit of fair treatment by reasonable co-workers and bosses, most of us are fortunate enough to be able to work around our aches, pains and minor conditions. The ADA is a wonderful tool that has made it possible for numerous people with serious conditions to contribute mightily to our country.

As Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in the court’s ruling, a true disability under the law is one that impacts the ability to conduct normal daily activities and is permanent or long-term. There is a difference, for instance, between being confined to a wheelchair and suffering back pain. The Americans with Disabilities Act will be stronger over the long run if its use is focused on conditions that are long term and serious.

By its own calculations, Congress expected the law to cover some 43 million Americans with a wide variety of conditions. Some of the claims filed under the act would have, if accepted, put virtually all Americans into protected categories. The Supreme Court doesn’t believe we are all severely disabled. Neither should the rest of us.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

Schwab: If you’re OK with foreign aid cuts, guess who’s next

At some point, if they haven’t already, Trump’s and Musk’s cuts will hit all but a very elite few.

Poor planning behind Snohomish PUD rate increase

It did not take long in 2025 for the Snohomish Public Utility… Continue reading

Trump’s aid cut will cost U.S. influence

The last time the U.S. pulled back its aid to other countries,… Continue reading

Musk’s financial access is a threat to personal data, payments

Recently Elon Musk along with six young men between 19-24 were able… Continue reading

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

Comment: Birthright citizenship has helped make America great

Trump’s attempt to end it, almost certainly unconstitutional, won’t fix the nation’s problems at its borders.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Feb. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

State single-payer health care bill offers many advantages

I was excited to read in Will Geschke’s report (“Everett lawmakers back… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.