Are you for RU-486? The debate is far from over

  • Ellen Goodman / Boston Globe columnist
  • Monday, October 2, 2000 9:00pm
  • Opinion

BOSTON — Within hours of the announcement, the small line popped up on one of the talk shows that dance across the cable channels: "All Over But the Shouting."

Is that it? Does the FDA approval of RU-486 signal a full victory, a smackdown in the wrestling match over abortion?

RU-486 had been stalled for so long, that I had come to think of it as the flight number of a plane held hostage. And of course it had been held hostage … to politics.

For a dozen years, the political turbulence had kept this drug grounded. Reagan and Bush the Elder had simply banned the drug known medically as mifepristone and popularly as "the abortion pill." But even when the climate changed with Clinton, it took more testing, more trials, more years to find a manufacturer, more time for the FDA to rule.

Now it’s all over? But the shouting?

On television, a shrill spokeswoman for Concerned Women for America warned that women who used RU-486 would be gushing blood and searching for embryo parts all over supermarket floors as they miscarried. In Congress the usual suspects ratcheted up their usual sound bites. J.C. Watts said: "Do-it-yourself abortion has no place in a civilized society."

Meanwhile, those who believe in a woman’s right to choose uttered a collective shout of victory. RU-486 has been touted as more than a medical alternative. It’s the magic drug that would reshape the debate. Tip the balance.

After all, in the past decade, as the pro-life strategy turned from trying to make abortion illegal to trying to make it impossible, many women have had the "right" to abortion without the access. Fewer than 2,000 clinics perform abortions. There are no providers at all in 86 percent of U.S. counties.

The big success of the anti-abortion movement has not been in changing women’s minds. Or even in changing the law. It’s been in frightening off doctors and closing clinics.

At the same time, the public debate shifted disastrously to those rare and troubling late-term abortions. In the past several years, the "shouting" has been over what’s labeled in a graphic and distorted way, "partial-birth abortion."

So many pro-choice advocates have pinned their hopes on mifepristone, though not because "the pill" is a medical panacea. Indeed, it involves two series of drugs and three doctor visits as well as a simulated miscarriage. In France today it accounts for less than half of abortions.

But mifepristone is, as the brand name implies, an "Early Option," used in the first seven weeks when an embryo is no larger than a grain of rice. There is no question that the public feels more comfortable with that early an abortion. So do women.

It also opens up the real possibility of increasing the pool of doctors who may no longer have to risk their lives to practice medicine. A third of doctors who don’t provide abortions now have said they would prescribe and oversee this treatment.

And, more to the point, it can allow women what the Supreme Court says they have: the right to privacy. A woman who can go to her doctor’s office for treatment doesn’t have to pass the gantlet of protestors and placards outside the clinic.

So it’s all over? I’m afraid that the shouting will still drive this debate.

The drug has been approved. But the remaining question about mifepristone is whether and when doctors will feel personally safe enough to prescribe it in their offices. Will they feel comfortable in states that still require a report on every abortion? Or in North Dakota, which requites that the remains be cremated or buried or incinerated.

What kind of chilling effect will the existing laws have on doctors and women in their homes and offices? What kind of chilling effect do "shouters" have on legislators and doctors?

The anti-abortion forces have fought RU-486 because they know it’s harder to target 20,000 doctors than 2,000 clinics. It’s much harder to intimidate and humiliate those patients.

But mifepristone doesn’t make the need for clinics moot. Nor does it mute the political reality that we are a Justice or two short of overturning abortion rights.

So here we are. In only four weeks, just a few days before the election, mifepristone will finally be available in America. It’s not all over. But in the midst of the shouting, may I add one cautious cheer: "It’s about time."

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON - OCTOBER 10: A Seattle Sonics fan holds a sign before the Rain City Showcase in a preseason NBA game between the LA Clippers and the Utah Jazz at Climate Pledge Arena on October 10, 2023 in Seattle, Washington. (Photo by Steph Chambers/Getty Images)
Editorial: Seahawks’ win whets appetite for Sonics’ return

A Super Bowl win leaves sports fans hungering for more, especially the return of a storied NBA franchise.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Feb. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Maybe we should show the EPA our insurance bills

While it has renounced the ‘endagerment finding’ that directs climate action, insurance costs are only growing.

City allowing Everett business to continue polluting

Is it incompetency, corporatocracy or is the City of Everett just apathetic… Continue reading

Good reason for members of military to refuse illegal orders

Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., texted me saying President Trump “called for me… Continue reading

Support U.S. assistance of Ukraine in fight against Russia

As we enter the fourth year of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine,… Continue reading

Comment: Listen carefully to the things that Trump can’t unsay

What Trump said about ‘nationalizing elections’ shows the unconstitutional lengths he’ll go to.

A Sabey Corporation data center in East Wenatchee, Wash., on Nov. 3, 2024. The rural region is changing fast as electricians from around the country plug the tech industry’s new, giant data centers into its ample power supply. (Jovelle Tamayo/The New York Times)
Editorial: Protect utililty ratepayers as data centers ramp up

State lawmakers should move ahead with guardrails for electricity and water use by the ‘cloud’ and AI.

Advocates for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities rallied on the state capitol steps on Jan. 17. The group asked for rate increases for support staff and more funding for affordable housing. (Laurel Demkovich/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Limit redundant reviews of those providing care

If lawmakers can’t boost funding for supported living, they can cut red tape that costs time.

FILE — Federal agents arrest a protester during an active immigration enforcement operation in a Minneapolis neighborhood, Jan. 13, 2026. The chief federal judge in Minnesota excoriated Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Wednesday, Jan. 28, saying it had violated nearly 100 court orders stemming from its aggressive crackdown in the state and had disobeyed more judicial directives in January alone than “some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence.” (David Guttenfelder/The New York Times)
Editorial: Ban on face masks assures police accountability

Concerns for officer safety can be addressed with investigation of threats and charges for assaults.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Feb. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.