Ashcroft’s attack on virtual pornography goes too far

  • William Raspberry / Washington Post columnist
  • Monday, May 6, 2002 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences recently added Clint Eastwood’s "Unforgiven" to its list of "great" films. That puts it right up there with "Casablanca," "Annie Hall," "Schindler’s List" and 70 or so other all-timers.

Some movie buffs are wondering why the list does not (as yet) include such epics as "All Quiet on the Western Front" and "It Happened One Night."

I’m wondering: Why isn’t Attorney General John Ashcroft doing what he can to put Eastwood behind bars?

You will recall that "Unforgiven" portrays, in unforgettably graphic terms, a number of murders.

And if you’re thinking that I’ve gone right out of my mind, let me tell you that I don’t really want Eastwood in jail. I don’t even want to talk about "Unforgiven." What I really want to talk about is Ashcroft’s official outrage over virtual child pornography. But I’m afraid if I’d said that straight out, you might have clamped your hands over your ears and refused to hear a thing I was saying.

Just as Ashcroft has clamped his hands over his ears, refusing to hear what the Supreme Court said in overturning a 1996 federal law aimed at ending the traffic in computer-generated child pornography. That legislation prescribed jail terms for the sale, distribution, possession or conveyance of images that "appear to be" of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

Ashcroft’s people are already at work drafting legislation to undo the awful effect of the ruling.

The rationale for legislating against child pornography had been that, whether or not children are harmed by those viewing, distributing or e-mailing the stuff, the children used in making it are harmed. Moreover, the mere existence of child porn using live models is evidence that children have been harmed.

It is for similar reasons that "snuff movies" were unlawful — not because of the execrable taste of the films or the possibility that they might have led a viewer to antisocial behavior, but because their very production involved murder.

The whole argument falls apart in the case of computer-generated porn — or of violent movies.

Which is why I started the column with Clint Eastwood. Everybody understands that people aren’t really killed in his movies, even if a few among us might be tempted to deal with our real-life problems the way he deals with his fictional ones. Some people think some Eastwood movies are too violent and refuse to see them. Others think they’re inappropriate for young children. But nobody thinks that making them is, or ought to be, a crime.

But how can you sit there and defend child porn, virtual or otherwise?

That’s the question that gets close to where I think Ashcroft is. He is so sure that we’d all be better off if this trash didn’t exist that he wants to zap it out of existence. But since the depraved people who make, distribute and take pleasure in this wretched stuff won’t voluntarily accede to his wishes, he’d invoke the force of law.

It’s a reaction that is more dangerous to our constitutional liberties than he recognizes, though it is well short of another reaction one hears: Anyone who would defend the constitutionality of kid porn, even computer-generated kid porn, must desire its existence.

Well, I don’t desire its existence, even though I wonder if the antisocial impact of its existence is as bad as some people claim. I mean, are pedophiles more likely to use porn to get revved for attacks on children or to use it as sublimation? I’m not sure we know the answer to the same question with regard to adult pornography. Does viewing "dirty" pictures make you more, or less, prone to commit sex crimes?

But those are questions for researchers. America’s chief law-enforcement officer ought to understand the difference between legal sufferance and condonation, between saying a thing is bad and saying it ought to be unlawful.

It’s OK to have a problem with gratuitous cinematic violence — even to suspect deep down that such simulated violence has a deleterious effect on the society.

But let’s not put Clint Eastwood in jail.

William Raspberry can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200 or willrasp@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

Sentencing reforms more complicated than column described

I read Todd Welch’s Jan. 29 column. He is certainly entitled to… Continue reading

President Trump running nation like his failed businesses

We’ve seen it before; President Trump will do or say anything to… Continue reading

Intent of Trump’s nominees is to subvert good government

It is clear that Donald Trump has something specific in mind with… Continue reading

Comment: Musk’s USAID shutdown an attack on most vulnerable

Even promises of ‘waivers’ are falling short and allowing medical efforts to dry up, endangering millions.

Comment: Real dangers loom with Trump’s incoherent trade policy

Even if Trump could settle on a justification for his tariffs, the results could leave the country far. weaker.

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump can go only as far as the courts will allow

Most of Trump’s executive orders are likely to face court challenges, setting the limits of presidential power.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.