At last, a Benghazi hearing without rancor

WASHINGTON — When Trey Gowdy got the job to run the House’s new Benghazi select committee, there was good reason to fear bad things.

Gowdy, a former prosecutor, was known for theatrical outbursts in hearings, rank partisanship and a fascination with Benghazi conspiracy theories about talking points, stand-down orders and Hillary Clinton’s culpability.

But when the South Carolina Republican chaired his panel’s first public hearing Wednesday, Gowdy did something unexpected: He played it straight.

There was no discussion of talking points or stand-down orders, and only one of the seven Republicans on the panel — Jim Jordan of Ohio — even mentioned Clinton. Instead, Gowdy adopted as the theme of his first hearing an idea suggested by one of the committee’s Democrats, Adam Schiff of California: How well the State Department has been implementing recommendations to prevent future attacks on U.S. diplomats like the one in Libya two years ago that killed four Americans.

This is exactly what congressional oversight should be: a bipartisan effort by legislators to make sure executive-branch officials don’t repeat past mistakes. The resulting bonhomie was unprecedented in the two years of Benghazi bickering.

“I thank you for holding this hearing today,” Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the panel’s hard-nosed ranking Democrat, told Gowdy.

Cummings’ gratitude flowed freely. He said the hearing was a “transformational moment — the kind of oversight that can be productive. It can be critical. It can sometimes even be tedious. But it can also save lives.”

Over three hours, there were so many thank-yous it could have been the Oscars.

“Honestly, I commend Mr. Schiff,” Gowdy said. “This was a wonderful idea.”

When Cummings asked the chairman whether he would have a State Department official return in a few months to report on progress implementing the new security recommendations, Gowdy immediately agreed.

“I want to thank the gentleman from Maryland for all of his help and … the cooperative nature with which he has always worked with me,” Gowdy said. “And I think it’s an excellent idea. … I will pledge to you: It will be done.”

All that was missing was a group hug.

The contrast with previous Benghazi hearings led by Rep. Darrell Issa of California could hardly have been greater. Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee (on which both Gowdy and Cummings serve) made investigations a show about himself — leveling unfounded accusations about high-level wrongdoing in the Obama administration, interrupting hearings to argue with Democrats, even shutting off the microphone (at an IRS hearing) when he didn’t like what Cummings was saying.

Gowdy let everybody else on the panel get a turn before he asked his questions. He didn’t enforce time limits strictly, and he abandoned the top row of the dais in favor of a seat closer to the witnesses. He didn’t quarrel, shout or ask gotcha questions.

Other members of the panel followed Gowdy’s example, with the exception of Jordan, who speculated about a conspiracy between Clinton and Mike Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as a way to discredit the State Department’s own report on Benghazi.

It is, of course, possible that Gowdy will later return to his incendiary ways. He may be building up credibility now before taking a more partisan approach later. But he deserves credit for defying expectations in his admirable debut.

The result was a fairly boring session, with arguments about obscure State Department policies and lots of discussion of “OSPB standards” and the like. The biggest bone of contention seemed to be whether the guy in charge of security at State should be an undersecretary or an assistant secretary.

But these are arguments worth having. Gowdy made a good case that the State Department hasn’t done all it should to prevent another Benghazi-like debacle, and there was agreement from Democrats to force the administration to do better. This is what congressional oversight is supposed to be about, rather than an exchange of political barbs.

As he wrapped up the hearing, Gowdy recalled the four dead Americans, one of whom had family in the audience. “I want to adjourn in memory of Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Ty Woods and Glen Doherty,” he said, “and pledge a process that is worthy of their memory and one that our fellow citizens can respect, regardless of their political ideations.”

Cummings embraced the theme. “We are Americans,” he said, “everybody trying to do the best they can to protect our people.”

For once, it really felt that way.

Dana Milbank is a Washington Post columnist.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toons
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Killer whales not trapped in nets during the 1970 Penn Cove capture stayed near penned kin until the last one was hauled away on a truck. (Wallie Funk/Whidbey News-Times file)
Editorial: After 50 years, the message in orcas’ Penn Cove return

The return by L pod, following deadly roundups in 1970-71, should serve as a reminder of responsibility.

Don’t tolerate slurs by players during Arlington-North Creek football game

I am writing to express my deep concern over the recent playoff… Continue reading

Put public spending on AquaSox stadium to the voters

I see the Herald has consumed the Kool-aid. The recent editorial (“Keep… Continue reading

Puzzled by choices voters made

I’m 78 years old, and a week after the presidential election, I… Continue reading

Krugman: Count on Trump’s plans bringing back inflation surge

Deportations will create job losses we can’t fill, causing food and housing prices to again soar.

Comment: How Trump can lie, yet sound believable

All that’s necessary is to pair Americans’ practice of skimming issues with Trump’s air of certainty.

FILE — Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) on a ride-along with a Skamania County paramedic captain near Carson, Wash. on Feb. 26, 2024. Perez, who is on track to win re-election in her rural Washington district, says her party needs to stop demonizing others and recruit candidates from diverse backgrounds. (M. Scott Brauer/The New York Times)
Editorial: What Washington state’s results say about election

Both parties should consider what state voters had to say on the economy and government investments.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Nov. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Schreiber should resign from Stanwood-Camano school board

Al Schreiber needs to resign from the Stanwood-Camano School District’s Board of… Continue reading

Everett baseball: Break with MLB’s extortionists

I own an Everett Giants ball cap and an Olive Garden seat… Continue reading

Where are today’s moderate politicians?

I was just thinking that I miss the way things were years… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.