Basing policy on evidence in Congress

As often as we see instances of partisan politics and gridlock coming out of Washington, D.C., there are occasional glints of light, hope that the stalemate might be broken and we might move forward on any number of issues facing the country.

One recent glint is legislation proposed by Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis.: The Evidence-Based Policymaking Commission Act of 2014. Proposed last month by the duo who a year ago negotiated the two-year budget agreement that ended the government shutdown, the act would create a 15-member bipartisan commission charged with finding methods to improve the gathering of federal data used to evaluate tax and spending programs. The panel’s members, representing economics, statistics, data security and other relevant areas, would be appointed by Senate majority and minority leaders, the House speaker and minority leader and the president.

The panel’s work to recommend policies to simplify the streams of information used in writing legislation is seen as key to lawmaking in Congress, allowing it to begin work to reform the tax code and implement efficiencies in government spending.

Commission members would have 15 months to prepare and submit recommendations to the president and Congress, with approval of 12 or more of the members.

One might hope that all of Congress’ work already is “evidence-based,” but there doesn’t always seem to be a high level of respect for or attention paid to data and facts.

Also late last month, the Republican-led House passed House Resolution 1422, which along with clearing a path for industry experts to be added to the Environmental Protection Agency’s Science Advisory Board, would also muzzle members of that board from participating in “advisory activities” that are drawn directly or indirectly from their own work or research. In other words, an expert in a particular field — for instance the effects of mercury on brain development in children, as has been studied by science board member Dr. Thomas Burbacher of the University of Washington — would be prevented from providing information based on his or her work out of an absurdly misplaced concern that such advice represented a conflict of interest.

Supporters of the bill, which passed 229-191, apparently are having difficulty discerning the difference between opinion and evidence and should be reminded that each of us has the right to our own opinions but not to our own facts.

We’ll need the Evidence-Based Policymaking Commission Act, but Murray and Ryan might want to consider vastly broadening its scope to issues beyond taxes and spending.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A visitor takes in the view of Twin Lakes from a second floor unit at Housing Hope’s Twin Lakes Landing II Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2023, in Marysville, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Housing Hope’s ‘Stone Soup’ recipe for community

With homelessness growing among seniors, an advocate calls for support of the nonprofit’s projects.

Burke: Don’t let Trump & Co. get away with ‘no comment’ on outrages

For the tiring list of firings, cuts, busted norms and unconstitutional acts, hold them accountable.

Opposition to amendment to habitat rules ignored

The article regarding Snohomish County’s habitat ordiance reports a preponderance of Snohomish… Continue reading

DIYers should get a PUD’s heat-pump break, too

I have just completed a do-it-yourself installation of a central heat pump… Continue reading

Everett Council, Dist. 2: Paula Rhyne has proved herself

Four years ago, a public servant ran for District 2 and won… Continue reading

Comment: Era of Buffett-, Gates-style philanthropy is ending

The tech billionaires see their space and AI quests as better than a bequest to fight poverty and disease.

Wildfire smoke builds over Darrington on Friday, Sept. 11, 2020 in Darrington, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Loss of research funds threat to climate resilience

The Trump administration’s end of a grant for climate research threatens solutions communities need.

Sarah Weiser / The Herald
Air Force One touches ground Friday morning at Boeing in Everett.
PHOTO SHOT 02172012
Editorial: There’s no free lunch and no free Air Force One

Qatar’s offer of a 747 to President Trump solves nothing and leaves the nation beholden.

The Washington State Legislature convenes for a joint session for a swearing-in ceremony of statewide elected officials and Governor Bob Ferguson’s inaugural address, March 15, 2025.
Editorial: 4 bills that need a second look by state lawmakers

Even good ideas, such as these four bills, can fail to gain traction in the state Legislature.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Douthat: What guides Trump policy is a doctorine of the deal

Hawk or dove, former friend or foe; what matters most is driving a bargain, for good or ill.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.