Believe only half of what you hear about listening

  • Ellen Goodman / Boston Globe columnist
  • Monday, December 4, 2000 9:00pm
  • Opinion

BOSTON — And now another bulletin from the infamous border where pop culture meets gender science. This time, it turns out that there are more differences between men and women than meet the eye. There are differences that meet the ear.

Researchers from the Indiana University School of Medicine measured the brain activity of 10 men and 10 women as they listened to excerpts from a John Grisham thriller. The results given to a meeting of radiologists show that most men used only the left side of the brain, while most women used both sides.

The Indiana report was duly summed up and dumbed down in the headline that screeched across newspapers: MEN ONLY LISTEN WITH HALF THEIR BRAINS!

This brought a collective "YES!!!" from women everywhere. "You aren’t listening?" is the universal complaint from wives who spend their lives like guests on Chris Matthews’ "Hardball."

Indeed, ever since the first Cro-Magnon mother returned from berry picking to find her husband painting wall pictures of the mammoth hunt while the baby cried on unheard, women have wondered how they tune out. Men are equally bewildered by women. As comedian Rob Becker likes to say, "If I read the paper, my wife will try to talk to me because she can read the paper and talk to me at the same time. I have to put my finger down."

Don’t you love it when science proves what everyone already believes? The Indiana study is fuel for the goose to say, "I told you so." And fuel for the gander to say: "I can’t help it, it’s my brain."

But I remember the days when scientists used to measure skulls to prove that the bigger-skulled men were smarter than women. I’m a bit skeptical when we assume that the female brain is twice as good or that men can only half-listen.

A longer look at the research provides some hearing aid. It turns out that the differences between Indiana’s men and women were neither unanimous nor uniform. It turns out too that the part(s) of the brain we use to listen proves nothing about our listening ability.

Micheal Phillips, a father of four daughters and lead author of the study that has tweaked the public imagination, says, "we don’t know if using one or both sides of the brain is the better strategy. It could turn out they’re equally good."

Phillips is the first to acknowledge that his wife, a doctor, is better at paying, uh, mind to multiple conversations at once. But he says that no one knows if this ability is hard-wired in the brain or learned in the culture. Or a bit of each.

So it goes in brain research these days. We now know that there are gender differences in cerebral as well as carnal places. We just don’t know what they mean.

Nevertheless, in the popularization of popular science we make fact-defying leaps of logic. It’s become part of the ongoing discussion about men and women.

After a brief hiatus in which we emphasized ways in which men and women are alike — vive la similarite — we are back to emphasizing differences. It’s he said/she said, Mars and Venus all over the planet. We are also back to emphasizing nature over nurture, genes over culture, as the source.

The swinging pendulum is being pushed, in part, by this new science. But it’s also a reaction to the difficulty of changing a culture. If little Johnny still likes trucks — aw, what the heck — maybe there’s a truck gene.

Of course it doesn’t quite work that way. Dr. Sally Shaywitz and her husband did the first brain-scanning research at Yale while watching men and women try to find rhymes for nonsense words. There was a lot of overlap and a lot of individual distinction in how the brains worked. But even when men used one side of the brain and women used both sides, "they were equally accurate and equally quick at the task."

The brain research may mean a great deal about why women recover language after strokes faster than men. But it may not mean anything about tuning in and tuning out.

Are you listening? Want to bet that the biggest differences in hearing are in the subjects, not the scans? If you want to see a gender divide, test those skills when the topic is a designated hitter or a fashion designer.

Our Indiana friends played John Grisham to the subjects. If you think men were only half-listening to Grisham, what on Earth, Mars or Venus would happen if they played Jane Austen?

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

November 17, 2025: But Her Emails
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Nov. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Where are cartoons lampooning Kamala Harris?

I agree with a recent letter writer, The Herald Opinion page’s cartoons… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons are satire; it’s to be expected

I have read and sent letters to the editor of The Herald… Continue reading

People should rely on own savings not on goverment assistance

Laudable is the social legislation that provides 26 weeks of subsidies to… Continue reading

Comment: What climate ‘realists’ miss are pledges’ quiet wins

Climate fatalists should consider that nations committed to reductions are meeting their targets.

Comment: Too many kids can’t read; blame lack of spelling tests

Leaving the task to spellcheck holds back kids’ skill and love of reading. Spelling is key to comprehension.

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

Editorial: Welcome guidance on speeding public records duty

The state attorney general is advancing new rules for compliance with the state’s public records law.

Canceled flights on a flight boards at Chicago O’Hare International Airport in Chicago, on Friday, Nov. 7, 2025. Major airports appeared to be working largely as normal on Friday morning as a wave of flight cancellations hit the U.S. (Jamie Kelter Davis/The New York Times)
Editorial: With deal or trust, Congress must restart government

With the shutdown’s pain growing with each day, both parties must find a path to reopen government.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Nov. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Ignoring Trump, stock market believes in climate crisis

Green energy and cleantech indices are outperforming the overall market. You can partially thanks AI’s demand.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.