Big business exasperates with its ‘laws’

I recently read an article regarding the problems a family had gaining access to their savings account at a large banking institution.

Their problems with their bank reminded me of an incident early in our marriage when my wife and I received a phone call from our bank telling us that our checking account was overdrawn to the tune of several thousand dollars.

They weren’t very happy and, like large organizations everywhere, whenever something like this occurs, they assume you’re wrong and proceed merrily from that assumption. Unfortunately, it was late in the day, the bank was closing, and the earliest that we could meet to get things squared away would be the next morning.

Being young, very conscious of our finances, and completely flummoxed, we did what any couple would do — we worried.

“Worry,” however, is sometimes a wonderful stimulant. It often makes you do things you wouldn’t normally do. In our case, we did what we thought was perfectly reasonable. We called the bank president’s mother.

We’d actually intended to call the president, but he was unavailable and his mother was listed as one of the bank’s founders and still active in its affairs. We figured, “What the heck.”

She turned out to be a very nice individual and, after hearing our story, told us that there must have been some mistake and that she’d talk with her son that evening.

I guess she did because, next morning, we received a call from her son telling us that, indeed, there’d been a mistake — on the bank’s part. There was a local construction company that had an account with them and the owner of that company was named “Simoneaux” (as you might guess, there are a lot of us in Louisiana). Said owner was also named “Larry.”

He’d written a large check for supplies and, somehow, that check had been routed to our account. No one at the bank had, apparently, thought to double check the check. However, all was now well and apologies were offered and accepted.

We were just glad that moms still counted for something.

For me, this experience sparked a lifelong interest in the (sometimes inexplicable) behavior of large organizations. Over time, I discovered that there are basic laws common to large organizations and, once such laws are understood, dealing with them becomes easier — though no less exasperating.

I wish I could claim authorship of the following, but I’ve simply collected them from books, articles read, Internet postings, and experiences others have mentioned. Therefore, to help you in dealing with large organizations, here are several “laws” to keep in mind:

•All correspondence from large organizations is written in four tenses: Present tense, Past tense, Future tense, and Pretense. “Pretense” is, by far, the most common.

A large organization, produced by expanding the size of a smaller one, never works as well as the smaller organization.

In any large organization, the purpose of automatic answering services is to keep you from ever reaching anyone who might be able to help you.

People in large organizations don’t do what the brochures introducing them say they do. The Assistant Vice President for Operations brings the paper, makes coffee, and fetches donuts.

As organizations grow, more and more time is spent reporting on the less and less being done. Stability — and ultimate size — is achieved when all available time is spent reporting on the nothing being done.

The effort expended by any organization in defending a mistake is directly proportional to the size of the mistake. If they lose five dollars of your money, they’ll admit their error. If they lose five thousand dollars of your money, you’re going to jail. Anything larger and they’ll have you shot.

In any large organization, the higher the level of the person assigned “to solve your problem,” the worse the problem will get. If you can get the janitor to type the change into a computer, however, the problem will be solved that day.

Large organizations measure time differently. “Now” is tomorrow. “Tomorrow” is next week. “Next week” is next year. “As soon as possible” is a measure of geologic time.

In any large organization, there will always be one person who knows what’s going on. That person will be the first fired in any staff reduction.

Finally, if you forget all else and can’t see any solution short of thermonuclear war, call the president’s mother. Sometimes, it works.

Larry Simoneaux lives in Edmonds. Send comments to larrysim@comcast.net.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Dec. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaks alongside President Donald Trump during an event announcing a drug pricing deal with Pfizer in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Sept. 30, 2025. Advisers to Kennedy appear poised to make consequential changes to the childhood vaccination schedule, delaying a shot that is routinely administered to newborns and discussing big changes to when or how other childhood immunizations are given. (Pete Marovich/The New York Times)
Editorial: As CDC fades, others must provide vaccine advice

A CDC panel’s recommendation on the infant vaccine for hepatitis B counters long-trusted guidance.

Comment: Retraction of climate study doesn’t improve outlook much

Even with corrected data, we still face dire economic consequences without a switch from fossil fuels.

Selection of teams for NCAA football playoffs indefensible

The continuing saga and explanation that the College Football Playoff Selection Committee… Continue reading

If state needs money it can collect license tab fees

Lately there have been multiple articles written in the newspaper about the… Continue reading

Don’t sue state for U.S. 2 fatal crash; sue the driver at fault

Regarding the $50 million lawsuit filed against the state for the death… Continue reading

Comment: Supreme Court’s 3 bad reasons for OK’ing Texas rigged map

Its reasons for allowing the gerrymandered maps defy the court’s constitutional responsibility.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Dec. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Welch: State’s business climate stifling; lawmakers aren’t helping

Now 45th for business in a recent 50-state survey, new tax proposals could make things even worse.

Douthat: White House needs more Christianity in its nationalism

Aside from blanket statements, the Trump administration seems disinterested in true Christian priorities.

Comment: Renewing ACA tax credits is a life or death issue

If subsidies aren’t renewed, millions will end coverage and put off life-saving preventative care.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.