BLM protests and Capitol riot are not same thing

I am writing in response to the Jan. 24 letter by Sonya Beardsley. Ms. Beardsley questions why the governors, mayors, and senators were not outraged at the violence and property damage in Seattle and Portland over the summer but have spoken up about the riot at the U.S. Capitol.

The incidents in Seattle and Portland were non-violent rallies and protests, against police violence and murder, specifically murders of Black men and women. They followed the brutal murders of Breonna Taylor, Ahmed Arbury and George Floyd. The marches were mostly peaceful until they were infiltrated by white supremacists and white nationalists, looking for a way to cast negative light on the Black Lives Matter and civil liberties groups. The property damage and violence represented 7 percent of the totality of the marches, protests and rallies. The protesters were not armed; the white supremacists were.

The property damage and violence at the U.S. Capitol was caused by the protesters themselves. They morphed from a rally to a protest to a riot. They were heavily armed. They were stoked into rage by the former president and other politicians. They had been lied to for years, and then very intensively for months about the election. They were force fed The Big Lie. They were primed on conspiracy theories. Their grasp of reality was questionable or negligible. They were instructed to go to the Capital and “take back their country.” In their fevered rage and delusions, they mounted an armed insurrection of the U.S. Capitol. Their aim was to overturn a free and fair election. They were acting as seditionists. That’s against the law.

Ms. Beardsley attempted to equate two dissimilar situations. The inception and carrying out of the property destruction and violence are completely different. But what they have in common, in addition to broken windows, furniture and structures, is dead people. I do not condone violence or property damage in either case, but your outrage at elected leaders is misplaced.

Mary Ellen Hardy


Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Monday, Jan. 30

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Vivian Dong, the founder of Safe Lynnwood, leads a group of protesters from the future site of a methadone clinic to the nearby Alderwood Boys & Girls Club on Saturday, Jan. 14, 2023, in Lynnwood, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Don’t let fear foil answers to opioid, other crises

A methadone clinic and mental health facility deserve communities’ support, not their opposition.

Comment: FDA should fix its ‘one-size-fits-all’ booster advice

For older at-risk adults, more frequent covid boosters may be necessary, but others should wait longer.

Comment: If Republicans want debt fight, Biden shouldn’t wait

He should tell the Treasury secretary not to put off the default date and call Republicans’ bluff.

Comment: Market turmoil may be only way to motivate Congress

What to watch for as parties begin their game of chicken over raising the debt ceiling to avoid default.

Comment: Entitlements offer Trump opening against DeSantis

Trump’s defense of Social Security and Medicare contrast with DeSantis’ past votes to cut benefits.

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Jan. 29

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Catherine Berwicks loads ballots into a tray after scanning them at the Snohomish County Elections Ballot Processing Center on Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2020 in Everett, Wa.  (Andy Bronson / The Herald)
Editorial: Boot meaningless tax ‘advisory’ measures from ballots

The public needs better transparency on taxes; not an opaque push poll that serves no purpose.

Washington Future Fund
Editorial: Fund could break inequitable cycle of poverty

State version of ‘baby bonds’ would provide capital for low-income young adults’ economic success.

Most Read