Campaigns reacted poorly to base closures

  • Jim Hoagland
  • Saturday, August 21, 2004 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON – John Kerry and his newly militaristic Democrats are running to the right of George W. Bush on national security policy and enjoying some success in that unlikely enterprise. They are wresting political advantage from Bush by painting him as the candidate who is playing politics with security.

Surprisingly, Bush and Karl Rove are giving the Kerry camp room on the right. When Bush dropped three paragraphs of hyperbolic generalities about a global Pentagon redeployment plan into a campaign speech last week, Kerry and his surrogates quickly seized the moment and perhaps the momentum – in part by mischaracterizing the Bush plan.

In this campaign it is the Democrats who demand larger standing armed forces, want more of them stationed abroad than Bush does, and miss no occasion to hammer the president for not prosecuting the war on terrorism more vigorously.

This is all couched in the tactical subjunctive – in promises to do better and more when in office. The Democrats submerge differences on Iraq by not challenging Kerry’s vague, Nixon-like “plan” to end the real war there. The party’s substantial antiwar wing will apparently do anything, including staying quiet for a few months, to see Bush defeated.

That makes sense at this point. Around 55 percent of the U.S. public wants a new president, says a senior Democrat who lives and breathes polling data. But 52 percent fear changing leaders in wartime. Kerry’s task, this Democrat believes, is to win the confidence of enough voters in that second group to win the election in November.

Bush’s continuing ambivalence on the nature of this “wartime” gives Kerry his maneuvering room on defense issues. The president employs the rhetoric of national danger and sacrifice – without seeking wartime budgets and other measures of urgency to underpin his strategy.

Consider the global redeployment plan to move about 60,000 U.S. soldiers out of Europe and another 12,500 from South Korea over 10 years, which Bush briefly spotlighted at the Veterans of Foreign Wars convention Monday and which Kerry blasted at the same forum Wednesday.

This plan was grinding along in the bureaucracy before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. It contains core ideas about withdrawing U.S. troops no longer needed to repel a Soviet invasion in Europe that I first heard Bush lay out in a December 1999 interview. He made clear then that he expected his foreign policy agenda as president to be dominated by reshaping U.S. forces and alliances to reflect the end of the Cold War.

This long-horizon plan has little to do with the war on terrorism, Iraq or the renewed confrontation with North Korea – and that is precisely the political problem for Bush. By choosing to highlight it but not connect it in the VFW speech, Bush thrust what is essentially a mindless bureaucratic exercise into a political arena currently dominated by the search for answers on Iraq.

The Pentagon’s most painful problem in real life is not Moqtada Sadr or Kim Jong Il. It is closing any military base in Congressman X’s district. Abandoning bases abroad is, by comparison, a piece of cake. The closing of several hundred installations in Germany is a necessary political prelude to the consolidation and reduction of bases at home in what is a rational, budget-driven exercise.

Despite the Kerry campaign charges that the reductions will disrupt alliance management, the specific reductions come largely at the prompting of NATO members and the South Korea government, all eager to regain valuable real estate and freedom from environmentally destructive military maneuvers. The changes have been under discussion for nearly two years.

“This is one time we cannot say we have not been consulted,” a German official told me last spring.

But in campaign season, why a thing is being said now and by whom become issues in themselves. Bush and Rove should have picked that up from the pointless controversy over Homeland Secretary Tom Ridge’s dramatic warnings that Washington, New York and New Jersey faced new al-Qaida attacks – and the revelations a day later that much of the surveillance was pre-9/11.

The warnings were justified, subsequent information suggests. Had they been nuanced and issued by a nonpolitical figure such as FBI Director Robert Mueller – and if the Pentagon redeployment plan had been unveiled by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Richard Myers – controversy (and opportunity for Democratic chest-pounding) would have been lessened.

The all-too-real threats that loom for the American electorate in this campaign require unusually straight talk and responsible behavior from both candidates and their parties. All fell short last week.

Jim Hoagland is a Washington Post columnist. Contact him by writing to jimhoagland@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Feb. 8

A sketechy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Comment: Democracy depends on support of local journalism

A state bill provides funding to support local news outlets through a modest tax on tech businesses.

Comment: Love is intoxicating; romance doesn’t have to be

Navigating sobriety while dating, with Valentine’s Day coming up, is possible and fulfilling.

Comment: State attempt at single-payer health care bound to fail

Other states have tried, but balked when confronted with the immense cost to state taxpayers.

Forum: Requiem for a lost heavyweight: Sports Illustrated

SI, with Time and NatGeo, were a holy trinity for me and my dad. Now, it’s a world of AI clickbait.

The Buzz: Why, no, we have complete trust in Elon Musk

But whatever he and Trump are doing to the country, could they please wish it into the cornfield?

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Push back news desert with journalism support

A bill in the state Senate would tax big tech to support a hiring fund for local news outlets.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Feb. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Forum: Political leaders should leave trash talk to ballplayers

Verbal intimidation is one thing on the basketball court; it shouldn’t have a place in our politics.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.