Can we treat one another better: as fellow citizens?

  • William Raspberry / Washington Post columnist
  • Thursday, November 30, 2000 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — A friend once took me to see her newly built home in the Tennessee mountains near Sewanee. We drove up, and she opened the door and walked right in. No key discreetly hidden under the doormat, nothing. Just an unlocked front door.

When I remarked about it, she told me, "We have a saying around here: Why lock your door? A neighbor might need something."

I thought: What a wonderful way to live! And, a split second later, how dangerous! All it would take is one neighbor with a bad attitude for everybody else to get ripped off—or worse. It would be nice to live among such trusting and trustworthy people, I told myself, but let’s get real.

I think we are always engaged in a battle between optimism and cynicism — between the desire to help create the sort of community (or world) we’d like to live in, and the fear of being played for a fool.

Cynicism is winning. The victory manifests itself in ways that include not only locked doors but also locked minds and locked hearts. Name virtually any public controversy, from welfare to abortion to ballot-counting in Florida, and instead of lending even a modicum of support to a neighbor’s argument, we lock up.

We might be tempted — either as a government or as individuals — to be generous to poor and needy people. But it takes only a few stories of "welfare queens" or legless beggars who have salted away scores of thousands of dollars to make us lock up.

We are fully capable of seeing at least two sides of most arguments. We can see the logic of following the law as the best way to resolve Florida’s vote-counting fiasco, and we can also see the appeal of making as sure as we can that voters have their opinions registered.

But we won’t let ourselves acknowledge that the other side has a point, fearing that such a show of weakness will be used against us. We lock up.

Anyone could agree that it’s a good thing for parents to have more educational choices for their children. But some of us, fearing that every choice proposal is an attack on us and our political allies, pretend to see no value in expanding those choices. We whip out studies proving that their studies are misleading or based on incomplete data. They produce studies proving that our studies are wrong.

Why should we admit that the other side has a point when we are dead certain they’ll make no such admission in return?

The danger, as any lawyer will tell you, is real. But there is another danger I believe to be far more serious: The danger that we will never discover how trivial the differences between us can sometimes be, that we will fail to move from our locked-door positions toward the common ground that can transform warring factions into fellow citizens.

Even this incredible mess of an election we are still trying to sort out is, at bottom, over fairly minor differences. Neither candidate was anywhere near either the socialist or the libertarian extreme. There just wasn’t that much difference between them — which may be why half the American people voted for one and half for the other.

But the prediction is routinely made that the eventual winner and his party will have great difficulty running the government because the election was so close.

The assumption is that the winners, no matter the slimness of the victory, will lock their doors against the losers (who will be accused of trying to take by negotiation what they failed to win at the polls), which means that the losers must refuse to cooperate with the winners (whose real agenda, it will be assumed, will be to increase and solidify their advantage).

The assumption, in short, is that all of us will yield to our cynical side. And as long as that is the assumption, it will probably be the fact. Each side will be cynical — will almost have to be cynical — so long as the other side operates on the expectation of cynicism.

Are we locked in this futile and dangerous routine? I’m looking, as I often do, at the framed quotation from Goethe on my office wall:

"If you treat an individual as he is, he will stay as he is. But if you treat him as if he were what he ought to be and could be, he will become what he ought to be and what he could be."

Will we — can we — learn to treat people as they ought to be, and respond in kind when they treat us as we ought to be?

Or is this an attitude that can exist only on pristine Tennessee mountaintops?

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, May 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - A worker cleans a jet bridge at Paine Field in Everett, Wash., before passengers board an Alaska Airlines flight, March 4, 2019. Seattle-based Alaska Airlines owns Horizon Air. Three passengers sued Alaska Airlines on Thursday, Nov. 2, 2023, saying they suffered emotional distress from an incident last month in which an off-duty pilot, was accused of trying to shut down the engines of a flight from Washington state to San Francisco. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: FAA bill set to improve flight safety, experience

With FAA reauthorization, Congress proves it’s capable of legislating and not just throwing shade.

The author’s 19-year-old niece, Veronika, was among seven people killed by a gunman on May 23, 2014, in Isla Vista, Calif.
Comment: I lost my niece to gun violence 10 years ago this week

Since then, Washington state voters and lawmakers have taken bold steps to discourage gun violence.

Comment: Reroute of Harvey Field runway not worth flood risk

Without a projected need for expansion, the work risks flooding impacts to wildlife and residents.

Expanding grants will help more students get college degrees

For good or ill, the American labor force is being automated. To… Continue reading

Was I-5’s long closure necessary?

It seems there needs to be a rational discussion and possibly a… Continue reading

Balloon releases are harming wildlife

When will the media stop perpetuating the myth that releasing balloons into… Continue reading

1oth LD, Senate race: St. Clair brings experience to post

We are fortunate to have an outstanding Democratic candidate running for State… Continue reading

FILE — TikTok content creators at a news conference with several House Democrats on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, March 12, 2024. A bill that would force a sale of TikTok by its Chinese owner, ByteDance — or ban it outright — was passed by the Senate and is expected to be signed into law by President Biden; now the process is likely to get even more complicated. (Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Comment: Why TikTok’s lawsuit of federal ban isn’t all talk

The social media app’s makers are challenging the ban on legitimate First Amendment grounds.

The vessel Tonga Chief, a 10-year-old Singaporean container ship, is moored at the Port of Everett Seaport in November, 2023, in Everett. (Ryan Berry / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Leave port tax issue for campaign, not the ballot

Including “taxing district” on ballot issue to expand the Port of Everett’s boundaries is prejudicial.

Snohomish County Councilmembers Nate Nehring, left, and Jared Mead, speaking, take turns moderating a panel including Tulip Tribes Chairwoman Teri Gobin, Stanwood Mayor Sid Roberts and Lynnwood Mayor Christine Frizzell during the Building Bridges Summit on Monday, Dec. 4, 2023, at Western Washington University Everett in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Candidates, voters have campaign promises to make

Two county officials’ efforts to improve political discourse skills are expanding to youths and adults.

Attorney General Bob Ferguson speaks to a reporter as his 2024 gubernatorial campaign launch event gets underway in Seattle, on Saturday, Sept. 9, 2023. ( Jerry Cornfield/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Recruiting two Bob Fergusons isn’t election integrity

A GOP activist paid the filing fee for two gubernatorial candidates who share the attorney general’s name.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.