Canadian drugs are just fine for Americans

Remarks by “manufacturers and distributors of prescription drugs,” to the effect that Canadian prescription drugs may be inferior and present a danger to American users, appear to be self-serving. The same may be said for Lawrence Kocot’s remarks (“Industry group cites possible danger from imported drugs,” April 6, newswire).

Furthermore, it may appear such hasty remarks are insulting to our neighbor to the north. Canadians have been using such prescription drugs, not approved by America’s FDA, for decades. During the five years I lived in Toronto, my family and I received remarkably good medical care and effective prescriptions from physicians at Sunnybrook Hospital Clinic. Since we, and apparently others, were never harmed by these drugs, it seems they are “safe” without the FDA stamp of approval.

Retired seniors in America, living on considerably less income than they had when employed, must now pay the full amount of high-priced prescriptions in America. Even though the drugs may have been declared “safe” by the FDA, it is unsafe in that economics makes possible situations in which necessary drugs are not being used, or the dosage is cut in half without doctor’s approval, by patients.

In Washington, there is hardly an HMO or PPO that I know of offering prescription drug coverage. Yet, in California, and perhaps nearby Oregon, there is Kaiser Permanente that provides prescription drugs at a reasonable co-pay.

You see, as we age, we need more prescriptions to maintain our health. The Canadian option appears reasonable, viable and safe without FDA approval. There is no reasonable need to suspect inferiority in Canadian drugs.

Everett

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — Supporters of President Donald Trump storm the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Jan. 6, 2021. The Supreme Court’s ruling that Trump enjoyed broad immunity from prosecution over official acts has opened the possibility that more evidence in his attempt to subvert the 2020 election could be revealed in public court filings — maybe even before the upcoming presidential election. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Editorial: As important as voting is acceptance of voters’ will

Regardless of outcome, voters must acknowledge the result, then work within democracy’s framework.

Schwab: Americans know what they want; they’re going to get it

Whatever happens, however dictatorial, it’s what the voters wanted, and we’ll have to live with that.

Brooks: Trump did what Democrats failed to do; address class

Democrats had one job: to combat inequality. They failed to see what was right in front of them.

Comment: What’s ahead in a second Trump administration

Allowed a freer reign by advisers and the Supreme Court, Trump’s return promises a rough ride.

Comment: Meta’s ‘AI slop’ taking the ‘social’ out of social media

By offering free AI tools, Meta is replacing human-generated content with bizarre, meaningless imagery.

Comment: Universal pre-K is worth the cost; we now have proof

In fact, a study shows the return on investment for child care programs is $5 for every dollar spent.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Our leaders must reconcile, work together

Never in my 16 cycles of voting have I seen our country… Continue reading

Time to move on and put personal over political

Since getting older I have grown tired of political opinions. The idea… Continue reading

Reform needed for flood insurance after disasters

A recent commentary in The Herald notes that the number of properties… Continue reading

Comment: Finding hope in the ‘good bones’ of a democracy

Despair is always an option; it’s going backward that we have to avoid.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.