Candidates reflect an American tapestry

WASHINGTON — It has been a guilty pleasure at times, like watching a particularly raucous episode of “The Jerry Springer Show,” but there’s something lovable about the way this year’s never-ending political campaign has turned out.

We now have two presidential tickets that display the American rainbow in all its eccentric colors. It’s as raw and real, and as unlikely, as the nation itself: on one side a suave, aloof African-American, twinned with a loquacious Catholic whose manner evokes his blue-collar roots; on the other, a certified war hero paired with a young woman from Alaska who looks like the heroine of a country music song and earns her reputation both as a beauty-contest charmer and a political “barracuda.”

And best of all, these four people are each, in different ways, American rebels. They have all made their way challenging conventional wisdom, telling off the know-it-alls, making a place for themselves and their ideas. They all retained their individuality in a political culture that tends to grind down candidates until they are palpable phonies. That didn’t happen with these four — whatever you think of them, they are who they claim to be.

Stand back a minute and consider what this often shrill and partisan campaign process has produced: The two parties converged toward the center, selecting in Barack Obama and John McCain presidential candidates who promised they would work across party lines to break the gridlock in Washington. The dividers lost. The victors were a change agent and a maverick. And each of them picked someone who shared his instinct to challenge the status quo.

It’s a refreshingly upside-down composite picture: The African-American candidate is the most conventional of the lot, with his Columbia-Harvard pedigree and his elegant Princeton-Harvard wife and his picture-perfect children. It’s the gal from Alaska, Sarah Palin, who reminds us of how messy the real world is, with her special-needs child passed from hand to hand, her pregnant teenage daughter, and the hockey-star boyfriend/father who looks, weirdly, like he just won the lottery.

And old John McCain, eyes flashing, tighter than a tick, just like old Gramps when he’s about to take a verbal shot at someone he thinks is a jerk. And motor-mouth Joe Biden, who can’t stop saying what he thinks, even if it’s to applaud how well his rival, Palin, did in cutting up Obama during her acceptance speech.

I’m sorry, but this is an American family portrait I like. I know all the reasons to be worried. Palin is breathtakingly unqualified to be president, and the idea that we would have someone in the White House who wants to overturn science and teach creationism in our public schools is, well, terrifying. McCain is too old and too prone to zingers to be an ideal commander in chief, his bravery and sense of honor notwithstanding. We need a president who knows how to settle conflicts honorably, as opposed to starting new ones.

As for the Democrats, they’re vulnerable, too. The rap that Obama is a charismatic celebrity has traction because in some ways it’s true: He takes sang-froid a step too far; he is so cool he’s unnerving, and it’s still too hard to be sure how he would govern as president. The most normal of the lot is Biden — how odd is that, that the lifelong senator would be the average Joe?

It’s going to be a fun last lap in this campaign — and a quick one, mercifully. One hopes the presidential candidates, McCain and Obama, will be true to their rhetoric of bipartisanship and keep the lipstick on the pit bull, as it were. Too much sweetness would be un-American. But amid the one-liners, these four must discuss the issues: America is in trouble, and we still don’t know how Obama or McCain would govern.

Some fundamentals this year ought to favor the Democrats: The Republican president is deeply unpopular; his party is exhausted, and the economy is probably headed for a recession. Yet the national security agenda tends to favor Republicans: We are fighting two tough wars, in Iraq and Afghanistan, nearing a third one in Pakistan, and face a cunning adversary in Iran. Over the next two months, we need to understand better what Obama and McCain would do about these conflicts, and more, how they would put the world back together.

But for now, let’s enjoy the American tapestry that’s laid out before us: Quirky, sometimes discordant, with some missed stitches and ragged patches, but quite a piece of work all the same.

David Ignatius is a Washington Post columnist. His e-mail address is davidignatius@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, March 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The Buzz: Week’s news already busted its March Madness bracket

A civics lesson from the chief justice, bird flu-palooza, the JFK papers and new ice cream flavors.

Schwab: Trump’s one-day dictatorship now day after day

With congressional Republicans cowed and Democrats without feck, who’s left to stand for the republic.

People still hold power, Mr. President

Amanda Gorman once said, “Yet we are far from polished, far from… Continue reading

Turn tide away from Trump and back to democracy

We are living in darkly historic times and it is no exaggeration… Continue reading

Kristof: America making Sudan’s humanitarian crisis worse

Amid a civil war, it’s pulled food aid and is silent about U.A.E.’s backing of a violent rebel group.

Goldberg: Meta tries to silence account of its ‘Lethal Carelessness’

The company is suing its author, a former insider; that should only encourage sales of the book.

A semiautomatic handgun with a safety cable lock that prevents loading ammunition. (Dan Bates / The Herald)
Editorial: Adopt permit-to-purchase gun law to cut deaths

Requiring training and a permit to buy a firearm could reduce deaths, particularly suicides.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: One option for pausing pay raise for state electeds

Only a referendum could hold off pay increases for state lawmakers and others facing a budget crisis.

**EMBARGO: No electronic distribution, Web posting or street sales before Saturday at 3:00 a.m. ET on Mar. 1, 2025. No exceptions for any reasons. EMBARGO set by source.** House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, (D-NY) speaks at a news conference about Republicans’ potential budget cuts to Medicaid, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Feb. 27, 2025. As Republicans push a budget resolution through Congress that will almost certainly require Medicaid cuts to finance a huge tax reduction, Democrats see an opening to use the same strategy in 2026 that won them back the House in 2018. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Editorial: Don’t gut Medicaid for richest Americans’ tax cuts

Extending tax cuts, as promised by Republicans, would likely force damaging cuts to Medicaid.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, March 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Fire District 4 shouldn’t need funding increase through levy

A recent Herald article led its readers to believe Fire District 4… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.