Can’t let agency waste more funds

Finally! It has taken The Herald several weeks to highlight the failure of the Snohomish Public Utility District’s project to tap geothermal power in the Cascade range. (Monday article, “Geothermal energy project a bust after drilling hits bedrock.”) The PUD apparently made a decision to abandon the project during spring 2012. Those wasted funds are in excess of $3.4 million.

More studies and analyses could have shown that the project was too risky for an organization like the PUD. Even the state of Washington is not willing to take such costly risks.

The PUD senior staff and the elected Board of Commissioners have led the organization to waste funds on projects with significant risk. Over the last few years, the PUD has wasted funds on projects which are not appropriately studied and planned.

The next costly PUD project that will suffer the same fate is probably the Tidal Project in the Admiralty Inlet — the main entrance to Puget Sound between Whidbey Island and the Olympic Peninsula. This project calls for the installation of several turbines below the surface of the water, which would generate electricity for about 1,000 homes.

There has been no positive information or news published to the PUD customer-owners. It may be that the project has already been abandoned. Perhaps the public will get information by fall 2012.

Enough is enough. This only touches the surface of wasted funds by the PUD. Now is the time to make some changes in leadership (or the lack of it) at the PUD. We the customer-owners of the utility would be better served by professionals who have the intellectual capacity to conduct studies, analyses, planning, to develop less costly and risky projects.

Perhaps we can start by supporting either Mr. David Swanson or Mr. Eric Teagarden, both candidates for PUD Commissioner. One of them should replace the incumbent who has been in office for almost 18 years. Immediate changes should start at the top. Other changes should follow.

Ignacio Castro, Jr.

Edmonds

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Feb. 28

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial: Lawmakers should adopt ban on firearm magazines

A revived proposal would limit the devices to 15 rounds and would set up a buy-back program.

Harrop: Sanders simply can’t match Bloomberg’s experience

Start with his being the mayor of the nation’s largest city, an entreprenur and a philanthropist.

Commentary: The sweet spot between panic and complacency

A healthy respect for the danger posed by the coronavirus can lead to measured, appropriate steps.

Commentary: Peer review by parties could strengthen primaries

A vote of confidence or no confidence could assess candidates’ abilities and inform voters’ choices.

State climate legislation is our responsibility to kids’ future

By opposing bills HB 1110, SB 5412 and HB 2892, Michael Scott… Continue reading

How about requiring firearms training for all students?

If the Legislature wants to do something about gun violence, then I… Continue reading

What’s so radical about Sanders’ plans for country

Sen. Bernie Sanders went to San Antonio recently and spelled out clearly… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Feb. 27

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Most Read