Cemetery debate needs compromise and action

The city of Snohomish is caught up in a legal matter that appears to pit respect for the deceased against reverence and concern for our living elders.

Two families whose pioneer ancestors are buried at Snohomish Cemetery are threatening to sue the city if it does not move the Snohomish Senior Center, which sits above the graveyard. It’s an understandably sensitive subject that demands concession and compromise in order to reach a resolution that keeps the senior center intact while respecting the buried ancestors.

The families offered $10,000 for Snohomish to relocate the center and restore the cemetery. But the city isn’t budging — on moving the center or the bodies. Last Thursday, the families’ $10,000 offer expired, and now they may bring Snohomish back to court if their demands aren’t met.

Snohomish officials say the city is committed to moving the bodies — eventually. Delaying the effort seems to be a critical diplomatic mistake on the part of the city. Even a small concession made by the city to the concerned families might offer some reassurance that the memory of their ancestors is being respected, and that something will be done soon to remedy the present situation — something that doesn’t involve getting rid of the senior center.

Ultimately, it is the older residents of Snohomish who stand to lose the most in the midst of this dispute. Assurance from the city that the pioneers’ remains will be "removed with time" just isn’t enough for the seniors urging the city to move the issue off the back burner and take care of it. Relocating the senior center would likely cripple the budget for the facility, as would any lawsuit filed against it.

As member Joyce Shanan said, "The kids got a skate park. There’s a library and a youth center planned — all are important … When do we get on the list?"

Burial grounds are revered sites for many cultures. Letters to the editor prove how justifiably upset people become when grave markers are vandalized. However, this particular cemetery had been in considerable disrepair and neglect for some time. Snohomish County Superior Court Judge Charles French ruled back in 1998 that those buried there would be better served if they were moved to another site. And this isn’t the first time bodies would have to be moved from the Snohomish Cemetery. Many graves were relocated in the late 1940s to make way for what is now Second Street, when it was built down the middle of the cemetery. Moving the bodies is not an unreasonable plan, but it must be accomplished in a timely manner for all parties involved.

The families whose ancestors are buried there and Snohomish’s senior citizens have valid concerns. Both groups deserve to "get on the list."

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A Sabey Corporation data center in East Wenatchee, Wash., on Nov. 3, 2024. The rural region is changing fast as electricians from around the country plug the tech industry’s new, giant data centers into its ample power supply. (Jovelle Tamayo/The New York Times)
Editorial: Protect utililty ratepayers as data centers ramp up

State lawmakers should move ahead with guardrails for electricity and water use by the ‘cloud’ and AI.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Feb. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Listening to, helping boys and men can help us all

State lawmakers can establish a state Boys and Men Commission to address the challenges they face.

Comment: LifeWise misreads Constitution in suing Everett Schools

Case law allows release time for off-campus religious instruction. Schools don’t have to promote it.

Comment: Without child care support, work stops; it’s simple

Families and employers depend on state child care assistance. Cuts to two programs would harm all.

Forum: Immigration raids involving children cause lasting trauma

The cruelty and terror inherent in raids by federal immigration agents cannot be allowednear children.

Forum: As go our forests, so goes our environmental future

The Trump administration’s move to end the Roadless Rule jeopardizes ancient forests and risks collapse.

Advocates for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities rallied on the state capitol steps on Jan. 17. The group asked for rate increases for support staff and more funding for affordable housing. (Laurel Demkovich/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Limit redundant reviews of those providing care

If lawmakers can’t boost funding for supported living, they can cut red tape that costs time.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Feb. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The Buzz: ‘Smile, Darn Ya, Smile’ when addressing the president

Reporters must remember to grin when asking President Trump about Epstein’s sexual assault victims.

Schwab: When you’re the president, they let you do anything

While Trump grifts for billions in his first year, Stephen Miller rethinks the non-rights of laborers.

Bill for cardiac response plans at schools can save lives of children

Recently, I visited Olympia to testify in front of the Senate Committee… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.