Church, state separation is an idea for us to shake on

  • Ellen Goodman / Boston Globe columnist
  • Sunday, September 30, 2001 9:00pm
  • Opinion

BOSTON — I don’t know if I can tell this story without being misunderstood — either by Muslims who are fearful or by bigots who are hateful. But let me try.

The other night I went to a meeting of educators, 30 or more, who had come to comfort each other and to think together about teaching students in the aftermath of September 11. A Muslim who lives nearby spoke in sober tones about his sorrows and worries, about the distorted images of Islam.

When it was over, a young teacher came up to this man, reaching out to shake his hand in gratitude. But he looked at her and said, "My religion doesn’t allow me to shake a woman’s hand."

Now I know as well as anyone that Islam comes in every shade, from feminist to fundamentalist. I know that it could have been a man from another religious tradition, an ultra-Orthodox Jew for example, refusing to touch a woman. I know moreover that every custom is not an insult and that the stricture against touching a member of the opposite sex is explained away by some as modesty, not sexism.

Nevertheless, it felt as if this young teacher had her extended hand slapped. I was shaken by this disconnection, a refusal so at odds with the spirit of the gathering.

I left that evening grappling with a hard reality at the heart of this multicultural country. We have the absolute guarantee of freedom of religion — even for religions that do not share core civic values.

In the past weeks, we’ve talked more about religion than ever in my memory. Americans have sought and found comfort in cathedrals and synagogues and mosques. We’ve also found confusion and dismay in the hard reality that religious fanaticism — an ancient evil — has reached our own shores.

On the morning after this encounter, I opened my newspaper. A letter to the editor under a headline "Let us pray" was one sarcastic sentence long: "Is it OK to pray in the schools now?"

On Page 2, in and around the news about terrorism, there was word that the Supreme Court is going to hear a case about school vouchers. The justices are going to decide whether Ohio — and by extension, any state — can give money to parents who want to send their children to private schools, which are almost all religious schools.

Over the past decade, many Americans have come to think of parochial schools of various faiths as nothing more than orderly, uniformed and often high-standard alternatives to decaying public schools, especially in the cities.

The operative phrase is "school choice." The favorite notion is that parochial schools provide "competition" for the "monopoly" of public schools.

But now we are back to basics, as they like to say in school. And the basic here is not funding or "choice" but the old constitutional bedrock: separation of church and state.

The generation that wrestled over the creation of this country knew all about religious diversity and national unity. These founders established the freedom of religion, the freedom of any American to worship as he or she wishes. On the other hand, they established a set of civil values that make us Americans.

We wrestle with this duality. People can believe that the world was created in seven days. They can believe their own race is supreme, that gays are sinners, that men are tainted by the touch of a menstruating woman. They can believe that their religion offers the only way to heaven, and every nonbeliever is damned to hell.

A church has the absolute right to uphold its own beliefs and teach them to children. Without that, it would have no center. But are Americans of different religions to fund those teachings?

Proponents of "school choice" have used the language of discrimination to claim that the government is somehow biased against religion. In a Supreme Court ruling over a year ago, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that rules excluding religious schools from government programs were "born of bigotry."

But we are getting a refresher course in the power of religion to divide as well as heal. We are being reminded that secular is not a dirty word. Our shared civic values need shoring up — as do the public schools, the places where children are molded into citizens.

There are old questions being asked these days. How does a country respect multiculturalism and uphold a shared set of civic beliefs? Should we be tolerant, even of intolerance? Is this a strength of democracy or a weakness?

In these arguments, the commitment to a separation of church and state is not a cliche. It’s a core and constitutional value. We have to shake on it.

Ellen Goodman can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200 or send e-mail to EllenGoodman@Globe.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Rivian, based in Irvine, Calif., has introduced its new R2 models, smaller and more affordable SUVs. (Rivian)
Editorial: Open electric vehicle market to direct sales

Legislation would allow EV makers to sell directly to customers, making lease or purchase easier.

President Donald Trump listens alongside Elon Musk as he explains the administration’s cost-cutting efforts in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025. Musk has for weeks posted on social media about government spending, often amplifying and seeding false information. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
Comment: This crisis can’t be left to courts alone

The courts can uphold the law, but they can’t match the speed of the executive branch in tearing down systems.

Eco-nomics: Climate change is making insurance a risky bet

Keeping home insurance affordable amid climate change will take adaptation to threats and broader efforts.

The Buzz: When you gotta boogie, best to shake it off, kid

A pasquidadian review of the week’s news.

Stick with solutions to homelessness that have heart

A friend of mine, a poet from Leningrad who was born during… Continue reading

SAVE Act would restrict voting rights

As a mother, I am flabbergasted by the continued and increasing attacks… Continue reading

Solar for All program is very beneficial and should be kept

The recent Herald article about the $156 million grant for Solar for… Continue reading

Comment: Keeping health care fair, affordable as costs rise

Bills in the state Senate would look to control costs and keep decisions in the hands of providers.

Comment: Proposal takes a swipe at credit card swipe fees

State legislation would exempt taxes and gratuities from the fees that credit card firms charge businesses.

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.