Comment: Americans welcoming Ukrainians; America isn’t

President Biden said the U.S. would accept 100,000 refugees, but immigration rules have prevented even that.

By Joy Ziegeweid / Bloomberg Opinion

Americans overwhelmingly say they want to welcome Ukrainians fleeing a Russian invasion that has displaced millions, laid waste to entire cities and horrified the world. Yet within the U.S. immigration system, an obstacle emerges: It’s hard to argue that Ukrainians should get “special” treatment, when so many other equally desperate asylum seekers, mostly non-white, have been rejected, jailed in inhumane conditions or stuck in interminable backlogs.

The solution: The U.S. must urgently reform its immigration system, so that quickly and efficiently providing refuge and work authorization to the most vulnerable migrants becomes the norm, not something special.

When the war began in late February, the European Union quickly granted Ukrainian refugees the right to live and work for up to three years, and has since accepted more than five million. Yet only on March 24 did President Joe Biden announce that the U.S. would take a mere 100,000, and his administration has yet to achieve even that.

Ukrainians displaced by the war must contend with an immigration system that is aimed at exclusion. A lucky few have entered on visitor visas, an option that provides only temporary safety and prohibits legal work. Thousands have traveled to Mexico and made their way to the Tijuana border crossing, where they were initially turned away under a public health law known as Title 42 — still being used to reject Central Americans, Haitians and Mexicans — but later granted an exemption that has allowed some 23,000 to stay in the country under humanitarian parole. A new program called Uniting for Ukraine will grant entry to those who can find U.S.-based sponsors willing to sign (unenforceable) declarations of financial support; potentially opening the way for tens of thousands more “parolees,” but also providing minimal resettlement assistance and exposing Ukrainian women to the danger of trafficking and exploitation by unscrupulous sponsors.

Gaining work authorization, essential to immigrants seeking to support themselves, is even more difficult. U.S. unemployment is near record lows, and Ukrainians are highly educated and motivated to work, yet adjudication of a work permit application can take as long as a year; including under a special program known as Temporary Protected Status, or TPS. Such delays will lead many Ukrainians to work unlawfully in low-skilled jobs, risking abuse, exploitation, denial of future immigration applications or even deportation proceedings. And even if parolees somehow obtain the right to work, their status will remain temporary. If they choose to stay, they may have no choice but to apply through the asylum system, which currently faces a backlog of 430,000 cases at asylum offices and more than 1.6 million at immigration courts.

This is not a good look for a self-professed nation of immigrants whose leader has pledged to help Ukrainians. So how can the U.S. fulfill its promise, and promises to other people fleeing violence and repression? First, ensure that entrants on humanitarian parole receive prompt assistance in applying for work authorization, and automatically expedite applications for prioritized groups (in this case Ukrainians). Second, rapidly adjudicate TPS applications. Third, pass an Adjustment Act allowing designated groups of parolees — for example, Ukrainians fleeing war and Afghans fleeing the Taliban — to apply for residence if they are unable to return to their country of origin at the end of their parole.

It’s frustrating that it has taken the plight of white-skinned Ukrainians to draw attention to the deficiencies of the U.S. immigration system, but if the result can be more humane treatment for all people fleeing violence and repression, so be it. Urgent action to accept more Ukrainians in the U.S. not only makes moral and economic sense; it’s a geopolitical imperative. The flood of Ukrainian refugees into Europe — Poland has already accepted more than 3 million, or almost 10 percent of its population — threatens to stoke anti-immigrant sentiment that could undermine the Western alliance in support of Ukraine. And that, in turn, could affect the outcome of the war itself.

Joy Ziegeweid is an immigration attorney in New York. She is a founder of the Legal Immigration Network for Ukraine, which provides information and pro bono legal support for those displaced by the war in Ukraine.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Sept. 27

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Sen. June Robinson, D-Everett, left, and Sen. Mark Mullet, D-Issaquah, right, embrace after a special session to figure out how much to punish drug possession on Tuesday, May 16, 2023, in Olympia, Wash. Without action, Washington's drug possession law will expire July 1, leaving no penalty in state law and leaving cities free to adopt a hodgepodge of local ordinances.  (Karen Ducey/The Seattle Times via AP)
Editorial: Robinson smart choice to head Senate budget panel

A 10-year legislative veteran, the Everett senator displays a mastery of legislation and negotiation.

Randall Tharp’s month recovery coins after battling a fentanyl addiction.  (Kevin Clark / The Herald)
Fentanyl crisis should force rethinking of approach

A continuum of care, that includes treatment in jails, is imperative, says a journalist and author.

Burke: Prevent a shutdown? GOP has squirrels it must chase

House Republicans simply don’t have the time to do their job. Pushing false narratives is tough work.

PUD’s smart meters should allow for lower rates

Finally! After more than 15 years of study and evaluation, the Snohomish… Continue reading

Everett Council, Dist. 6: Chatters won’t vote no to city’s needs

Regarding the recent story about donations to Everett City Council candidate Scott… Continue reading

Harrop: Romney’s third-party plan could backfire, aid Trumpists

If he wants a sane GOP in the future, those in charge now have to lose and lose big in 2024.

Comment: Even nearing ‘peak oil,’ its decline won’t be steep

The debate over when the peak will be hit is a distraction from the need to transition from fossil fuels.

Comment: Justices should let president keep his bully pulpit

How an administration alerts social media to problems needs a fuller consideration by the court.

Most Read