Comment: Everett measure would guide responsible development

Initiative 24-03 will protect the Snohomish River Watershed while allowing sustainable development.

By Holly James / For The Herald

Everett voters have a unique opportunity to lead the way in environmental protection.

With the Snohomish River Watershed facing increasing threats, we need bold, transformative approaches. Initiative 24-03 is not about impeding progress; it’s about redefining it to prioritize the health of our ecosystems. By granting legal rights to the watershed, we protect both nature and our community’s future.

The recent commentary by Johanna Talcott opposing Initiative 24-03 misses the mark (“Everett ballot measure could make housing crisis worse,” The Herald, Oct. 19). While it raises concerns about potential litigation and housing development, it overlooks the urgent need for innovative environmental protection and the long-term benefits this initiative offers. A thriving Snohomish River Watershed is essential for Everett’s future, and sustainable development can coexist with environmental preservation.

Importantly, Initiative 24-03 does not aim to halt all development; rather, it seeks to ensure that progress occurs in harmony with our natural environment. Best practices exist for developers to minimize harm to the watershed while pursuing growth and new housing. This initiative encourages sustainable approaches that can lead to more resilient and livable communities. By supporting Everett 24-03, we’re investing in the long-term health and prosperity of our region.

Talcott, a Florida-based attorney, argues that the current system is sufficient for protecting our vital Pacific Northwest ecosystems. However, this perspective fails to acknowledge that the system is not effectively addressing the ongoing deterioration of our natural resources. An attorney from the Pacific Legal Foundation, known for prioritizing corporate agendas over community welfare, has partnered with a well-funded group of developers to oppose this initiative. Their alignment reveals a significant conflict of interest, as they are the only organized opposition and stand to gain the most from maintaining the status quo.

Unchecked development in Everett has historically led to significant harm, forcing residents to bear the costs of cleanups. Granting legal standing to the watershed creates an additional layer of protection, enabling citizens to act as stewards of their environment. This legal recognition allows the watershed to be treated as an entity with rights, enabling it to be represented in court and defend itself against harmful practices. This empowers communities to take legal action against bad actors, ensuring they have the tools to protect their watersheds when other measures fall short.

This initiative serves as a proactive tool for environmental management. Instead of waiting for government agencies to intervene in response to environmental damage, citizens can address potential harms before they become irreversible, preventing costly cleanups. Initiative 24-03 doesn’t encourage frivolous lawsuits; it targets serious environmental harm. Legal actions would only be necessary when there is clear evidence of environmental harm, which is crucial for preventing the unchecked development that has contributed to our current environmental crisis.

Importantly, there is no financial incentive for individuals bringing suit against bad actors; all awarded dollars would go to the City of Everett and must be used for restoration.

Opponents claim that Initiative 24-03 is too broad, but this flexibility is crucial for tackling complex environmental challenges. The initiative aligns with existing laws that follow the precautionary principle — taking action to prevent harm before absolute certainty. This ensures timely intervention when evidence of harm is present, rather than waiting for irrefutable proof when it might be too late.

Moreover, Initiative 24-03 does not undermine property rights; it promotes responsible land use that considers the broader ecosystem. It encourages viewing property as part of a larger, interconnected natural system, essential for long-term sustainability, and can enhance property values by preserving the natural beauty that makes our region desirable.

We appreciate Talcott referencing Dr. Seuss’ “The Lorax,” a powerful reminder that economic growth is often prioritized over environmental concerns. We couldn’t agree more.

Voting yes on Initiative 24-03 is a vote for sustainable development, responsible stewardship, and a legacy that prioritizes long-term environmental health over short-term gains. Let’s lead the way in environmental governance and secure a better future for generations to come.

Holly James is the Snohomish County coordinator for Standing for Washington and lives in Everett.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toons
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Killer whales not trapped in nets during the 1970 Penn Cove capture stayed near penned kin until the last one was hauled away on a truck. (Wallie Funk/Whidbey News-Times file)
Editorial: After 50 years, the message in orcas’ Penn Cove return

The return by L pod, following deadly roundups in 1970-71, should serve as a reminder of responsibility.

Don’t tolerate slurs by players during Arlington-North Creek football game

I am writing to express my deep concern over the recent playoff… Continue reading

Put public spending on AquaSox stadium to the voters

I see the Herald has consumed the Kool-aid. The recent editorial (“Keep… Continue reading

Puzzled by choices voters made

I’m 78 years old, and a week after the presidential election, I… Continue reading

Krugman: Count on Trump’s plans bringing back inflation surge

Deportations will create job losses we can’t fill, causing food and housing prices to again soar.

Comment: How Trump can lie, yet sound believable

All that’s necessary is to pair Americans’ practice of skimming issues with Trump’s air of certainty.

FILE — Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) on a ride-along with a Skamania County paramedic captain near Carson, Wash. on Feb. 26, 2024. Perez, who is on track to win re-election in her rural Washington district, says her party needs to stop demonizing others and recruit candidates from diverse backgrounds. (M. Scott Brauer/The New York Times)
Editorial: What Washington state’s results say about election

Both parties should consider what state voters had to say on the economy and government investments.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Nov. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Schreiber should resign from Stanwood-Camano school board

Al Schreiber needs to resign from the Stanwood-Camano School District’s Board of… Continue reading

Everett baseball: Break with MLB’s extortionists

I own an Everett Giants ball cap and an Olive Garden seat… Continue reading

Where are today’s moderate politicians?

I was just thinking that I miss the way things were years… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.