By Holly James / For The Herald
Everett voters have a unique opportunity to lead the way in environmental protection.
With the Snohomish River Watershed facing increasing threats, we need bold, transformative approaches. Initiative 24-03 is not about impeding progress; it’s about redefining it to prioritize the health of our ecosystems. By granting legal rights to the watershed, we protect both nature and our community’s future.
The recent commentary by Johanna Talcott opposing Initiative 24-03 misses the mark (“Everett ballot measure could make housing crisis worse,” The Herald, Oct. 19). While it raises concerns about potential litigation and housing development, it overlooks the urgent need for innovative environmental protection and the long-term benefits this initiative offers. A thriving Snohomish River Watershed is essential for Everett’s future, and sustainable development can coexist with environmental preservation.
Importantly, Initiative 24-03 does not aim to halt all development; rather, it seeks to ensure that progress occurs in harmony with our natural environment. Best practices exist for developers to minimize harm to the watershed while pursuing growth and new housing. This initiative encourages sustainable approaches that can lead to more resilient and livable communities. By supporting Everett 24-03, we’re investing in the long-term health and prosperity of our region.
Talcott, a Florida-based attorney, argues that the current system is sufficient for protecting our vital Pacific Northwest ecosystems. However, this perspective fails to acknowledge that the system is not effectively addressing the ongoing deterioration of our natural resources. An attorney from the Pacific Legal Foundation, known for prioritizing corporate agendas over community welfare, has partnered with a well-funded group of developers to oppose this initiative. Their alignment reveals a significant conflict of interest, as they are the only organized opposition and stand to gain the most from maintaining the status quo.
Unchecked development in Everett has historically led to significant harm, forcing residents to bear the costs of cleanups. Granting legal standing to the watershed creates an additional layer of protection, enabling citizens to act as stewards of their environment. This legal recognition allows the watershed to be treated as an entity with rights, enabling it to be represented in court and defend itself against harmful practices. This empowers communities to take legal action against bad actors, ensuring they have the tools to protect their watersheds when other measures fall short.
This initiative serves as a proactive tool for environmental management. Instead of waiting for government agencies to intervene in response to environmental damage, citizens can address potential harms before they become irreversible, preventing costly cleanups. Initiative 24-03 doesn’t encourage frivolous lawsuits; it targets serious environmental harm. Legal actions would only be necessary when there is clear evidence of environmental harm, which is crucial for preventing the unchecked development that has contributed to our current environmental crisis.
Importantly, there is no financial incentive for individuals bringing suit against bad actors; all awarded dollars would go to the City of Everett and must be used for restoration.
Opponents claim that Initiative 24-03 is too broad, but this flexibility is crucial for tackling complex environmental challenges. The initiative aligns with existing laws that follow the precautionary principle — taking action to prevent harm before absolute certainty. This ensures timely intervention when evidence of harm is present, rather than waiting for irrefutable proof when it might be too late.
Moreover, Initiative 24-03 does not undermine property rights; it promotes responsible land use that considers the broader ecosystem. It encourages viewing property as part of a larger, interconnected natural system, essential for long-term sustainability, and can enhance property values by preserving the natural beauty that makes our region desirable.
We appreciate Talcott referencing Dr. Seuss’ “The Lorax,” a powerful reminder that economic growth is often prioritized over environmental concerns. We couldn’t agree more.
Voting yes on Initiative 24-03 is a vote for sustainable development, responsible stewardship, and a legacy that prioritizes long-term environmental health over short-term gains. Let’s lead the way in environmental governance and secure a better future for generations to come.
Holly James is the Snohomish County coordinator for Standing for Washington and lives in Everett.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
