Air traffic controllers Bridget Monroe (left), John Holcepl (center) and Chris Taylor watch the skies from the FAA control tower at Paine Field in September, 2014. (Mark Mulligan / Herald file photo)

Air traffic controllers Bridget Monroe (left), John Holcepl (center) and Chris Taylor watch the skies from the FAA control tower at Paine Field in September, 2014. (Mark Mulligan / Herald file photo)

Comment: Selling off air traffic control won’t make skies safer

By Bill Center

Most American homeowners have a mortgage and other consumer debt. Many also have a backlog of overdue maintenance — painting, roof repair and the like.

The same is true for the federal government. Our current national debt is rapidly approaching $20 trillion. Our nation also has a maintenance backlog of bridges and highways, for example, long overdue for repair. The estimated backlog adds another $6 trillion to $8 trillion.

America’s outdated air traffic control system is part of that backlog.

Congress knows safe air travel is a priority for us all, yet they’re wary of raising taxes or diverting funds from other priority programs to fund needed modernization.

Many leaders in the commercial aviation sector — frustrated with congressional neglect of needed upgrades — support a proposal to take air traffic control authority, equipment and personnel away from the Federal Aviation Administration and “give” it to a not-yet-created nonprofit organization. President Trump on Monday endorsed the plan to move more than 30,000 federal workers in the air traffic control system into such a corporation.

Congress would be happy to have the expense off their “to do” list.

Don’t be fooled by the word “nonprofit” in the proposal. The flying public would foot the bill as the airline industry and other users passed costs along to fare-paying passengers. The proposal will ultimately not save taxpayers a dime and will almost surely cost more than our current approach. Even worse, many smaller regional airports would likely lose air traffic control services under the new arrangement, depriving them of vital commercial and emergency access — a classic case of paying more for less.

It will allow our elected leaders to avoid raising taxes, then protest indignantly whenever the air traffic control system falls short.

The United States has the busiest air traffic control system on the planet. In 2016, airlines carried 928.9 million passengers on 9.7 million flights through our airspace. Our air traffic control system handles more flights than the next six busiest national systems combined. The system is overworked, undermanned and in serious need of updating.

Even so, and despite that heavy volume, our air traffic control system is extraordinarily safe. In fact, the privatized Canadian air traffic control system has a higher flight accident rate, despite handling only about 10 percent of the air traffic controlled by the Federal Aviation Administration.

There is another serious problem with this proposal.

Currently, our civilian air traffic controllers work seamlessly with Department of Defense controllers, allowing military and civilian aircraft to move safely across our nation’s skies. Experts question how well a private air traffic control system will work with our military. The Government Accountability Office, an independent Congressional investigatory agency, examined a range of issues associated with privatization. On the question of continued cooperation with Defense, the GAO report states that “It is unclear if established air defense procedures could be assumed by a non-governmental organization.”

The Pentagon also raised concerns. The Defense Department’s Policy Board on Federal Aviation determined: “The establishment of a new entity separate of the FAA raises serious concerns regarding the disposition of certain unique National Defense procedures, programs and policy. It is significant to note that the Defense Department relies on FAA ‘command and control’ capabilities in the execution of the National Defense mission.”

Safety issues aside, why transfer our air traffic control system to a new private entity when such a transfer could undermine national security?

Last year, despite the strong opposition of U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen, D-Washington, the U.S. House of Representatives included air traffic control privatization in legislation it approved to reauthorize the FAA. Fortunately, the Senate insisted on removal of the privatization language when Congress passed a short-term FAA reauthorization.

That authorization expires at the end of September, so the battle over privatization is again raging in the halls of Congress.

It does matter who runs our nation’s air traffic control system. It affects the safety of our skies and the ability of our military to keep us safe. The situation demands bold leadership, not evasion masquerading as entrepreneurial innovation. We need to invest in our air traffic control system, not sell it off to a private organization.

Rear Admiral Bill Center retired from the U.S. Navy in 1999 and now lectures on U.S. Foreign and National Security Policy at the University of Washington’s Daniel J. Evans School of Public Policy and Governance. He lives in Edmonds.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, June 4

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Lummi Tribal members Ellie Kinley, left, and Raynell Morris, president and vice president of the non-profit Sacred Lands Conservancy known as Sacred Sea, lead a prayer for the repatriation of southern resident orca Sk’aliCh’elh-tenaut — who has lived and performed at the Miami Seaquarium for over 50 years — to her home waters of the Salish Sea at a gathering Sunday, March 20, 2022, at the sacred site of Cherry Point in Whatcom County, Wash.

The Bellingham Herald
Editorial: What it will require to bring Tokitae home

Bringing home the last captive orca requires expanded efforts to restore the killer whales’ habitat.

AI ethics or AI Law concept. Developing AI codes of ethics. Compliance, regulation, standard , business policy and responsibility for guarding against unintended bias in machine learning algorithms.
Comment: What Congress can do to keep an eye on AI

It needs to establish guardrails, ensure accountability and keep the technology monopolies honest.

County auditor: Fell best suited for reelection to post

Garth Fell is the best candidate to continue to serve the Snohomish… Continue reading

Work zone speed cameras a money grab

Regarding the editorial about work zone speed cameras (“Set your muscle memory… Continue reading

Comment: What capital gains tax’s court win means for so many

The state Supreme Court’s decision makes the state’s taxes more fair and provides revenue to aid many.

Comment: State’s high court ignores precedent in writing its rules

In seeking to end ‘systemic racial injustice,’ court’s justices ignore constitutional constraints.

Comment: Public safety lost ground in this year’s Legislature

Legislation that would have better addressed racism’s effects on communities was not adopted by lawmakers.

A map of the I-5/SR 529 Interchange project on Tuesday, May 23, 2023 in Marysville, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Set your muscle memory for work zone speed cameras

Starting next summer, not slowing down in highway work zones can result in a $500 fine.

Most Read