Comment: Trump, GOP fostering voters’ suspicions of fraud

It’s typical for some voters to suspect fraud, but it’s potentially damaging for officials to foster those fears.

By Adam M. Enders and Joseph E. Uscinski / Special to The Washington Post

Right now, many Republicans believe that the election was rigged: The campaign of President-elect Joe Biden cheated, many argue, engaging in a widespread, systematic defrauding of the American people; somehow. These people do not accept that Biden was elected fairly, even as they welcome the Republican Senate victories that were achieved through the same process.

Our research shows that this attitude is more common when people lose elections than many might think. What is different this year is not that the losing side thinks it was cheated but that the leaders of their party (President Trump chief among them) are stoking and amplifying that view. The president’s refusal to concede and to begin the transition process — backed by prominent party leaders — has thrown the nation into tumult.

It’s important to keep the focus on Republican elites, because they are taking advantage of a phenomenon that has existed for years. For the past eight years, we have been asking nationally representative samples of Americans, before the presidential election: “If your preferred candidate does not win the presidential election, how likely do you think election fraud will have been involved?” In 2012, 2016 and 2020, the answers were consistent: About 40 percent of Americans responded that fraudulent behavior would “very likely” or “somewhat likely” explain the negative result. This stability of opinion is remarkable given the variability in candidates, levels of polarization, and campaign issues across these three election cycles.

These patterns harden after a winner has been declared. When we asked Americans, after each of these elections, if the outcome was the result of fraud, the losing side became more likely to suspect that suspicious activity was involved, the winning side less so. For example, in 2012 – once President Obama’s victory became clear, the percentage of Democrats believing fraud was “very likely” or “somewhat likely” involved in determining the outcome decreased from 49 percent to 12 percent. Meanwhile, the percentage of Republicans expressing that view increased from 54 percent to 62 percent. Our findings complement a number of studies showing that losers tend to see election results as less legitimate than do winners.

Historically, these beliefs are roughly symmetrical between Republicans and Democrats. In our October 2020 poll of 2,014 U.S. adults, for example, 45 percent of Republicans and 44 percent of Democrats believed that if the other side won, it would at least “somewhat likely to be due to fraud. Other research finds similar patterns: When asked, in 2012, whether “President Bush’s supporters committed significant voter fraud in order to win Ohio in 2004,” 37 percent of Democrats said this was “probably true”; when asked if ” President Obama’s supporters committed significant voter fraud in the 2012 presidential election,” 36% of Republicans said this was “probably true.”

In general, everyone anticipates fraud, but only losers meaningfully retain such beliefs.

This research demonstrates that the major difference between 2020 and past elections has little to do with the innate, individual-level factors that motivate perceptions of voter fraud and everything to do with the behavior of political elites. In no other year that we studied did political leaders aggressively cast doubt on the outcome of the election (or implicitly cast aspersions on results by remaining noticeably silent).

Decades of research demonstrate that elite messaging sets the tenor of political discourse; that people follow the cues of their leaders. The longer Trump and his allies traffic in evidence-free claims about voter fraud, the longer associated perceptions of fraud among the mass public are likely to remain powerful, and perhaps even grow in intensity.

The impact of sustained charges of fraud are speculative, to be sure; we are now firmly in uncharted territory. As courts reject Republican claims, will public opinion — or the signals sent by elites — shift, for example? But given that the public appears primed to believe charges of fraud in the best of times, Trump and many Republican elites are playing a dangerous game. If they persist, we should not be surprised if the anxieties they are exploiting lead to mass demonstrations and, perhaps even violence.

Adam M. Enders is assistant professor of political science at the University of Louisville where he studies conspiracy beliefs, misinformation and political polarization. Joseph E. Uscinski, an associate professor of political science at the University of Miami, is co-author of “American Conspiracy Theories.”

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Dec. 4

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - In this Tuesday, March 31, 2020, file photo, Washington Army and Air National Guard soldiers confer in an operations room at Camp Murray, Wash. The state of Washington is calling in the National Guard to help process unemployment benefit claims as officials grapple with a backlog caused in part by a fraud ring that stole more than half a billion dollars in aid, officials said Thursday, June 11, 2020. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren,File)
Editorial: Take steps to make most of next jobless aid bill

State and federal authorities need to improve delivery of unemployment benefits for covid relief.

FILE - In this May 22, 2019, file photo, Christopher Krebs, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington. President Donald Trump on Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2020, fired Krebs, the director of the federal agency that vouched for the reliability of the 2020 election. Trump fired Krebs in a tweet, saying his recent statement defending the security of the election was “highly inaccurate.”  (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File)
Comment: Paper ballots prove the election wasn’t hacked

A switch made by key states to provide a paper-ballot record eliminated a hacking weakness.

Harrop: America is letting Trump’s calls go to voice mail

Like much of the rest of America, more GOP officials and companies are moving on from the Trump era.

Comment: Biden building team that looks like people it serves

To showcase that diversity, Biden has introduced them in small groups, emphasizing their talents.

Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Dec. 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Macro photo of tooth wheel mechanism with imprinted RECEIVE, GIVE concept words
Editorial: We can meet increased need caused by covid

As GivingTuesday nears, consider how you can help nonprofits with the work they do in your community.

A latte is made at Narrative Coffee on Oct. 4, 2018 in Everett, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Covid only upped need for Small Business Saturday

Locally owned businesses need your support to survive the pandemic. Here’s how to do so safely.

Tonya Drake is chancellor of WGU Washington. (Courtesy of WGU)
Editorial: Education can build on Native Americans’ heritage

There are obstacles to higher education, but also new opportunities to increase students’ access.

Most Read