Comment: Trump, Musk blunder into Social Security minefield

In attempting to cut services, then backtracking, only to press on, service is denied to seniors.

By Martin Schram / Tribune News Service

President Trump was about to be blindsided. Yet he seemed clueless that a Social Security political bombshell was about to be detonated from within; one perhaps powerful enough to shatter the trust of many of his MAGA faithful.

But then, just in the nick of time, a most unlikely and unexpected rescuer appeared on March 12. And for a while, it seemed Trump was heeding the warning of his unlikely rescuer; and would prevent his presidency from plunging itself into a devastating political firestorm ignited unwittingly by his new best billionaire pal, Elon Musk.

But that too was not to be. Because what we were about to witness was a classic example of how nothing is simple or orderly in this chaotic, crisis-riddled first 100 days of Trump’s 2.0 presidency. And so Trump’s yes-no-maybe Presidency 2.0 was not about to remain stable long enough to allow its leader to remain comfortably rescued.

Here’s the full story, as reported by your investigative pundit at the always-busy intersection of the policy, politics and the news media.

For weeks, we have been covering the dramatics in which Trump has allowed his pal Musk to be recklessly chainsawing and down-servicing our federal government. Trump voters in red states have seemed to be suffering most from massive cuts that didn’t seem likely to Make America Great Again.

All Americans paid into the Social Security all their working lives, expecting their government to make it easy for them to receive the benefits they’d earned. But then Trump and Musk kept repeating claims both men knew were false: that Social Security is paying benefits to people listed at 150 years old and older. Musk repeatedly called Social Security “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.”

Now this: On March 12, at 12:04 p.m., EDT, Washington and the nation were stunned by an online scoop from The Washington Post. Headline: “Social Security, facing pressure from DOGE, weighs big cuts to phone service.” Subhead: “Agency considers ending phone program that helps with claims processing and is used by millions of elderly and disabled Americans.”

Trump’s DOGE Musketeers were reportedly considering scrapping the free phone service that 73 million Americans have long used to access the benefits they are owed. Musk’s DOGE computer whiz kids wanted to require the elderly to deal with Social Security identification online or at regional centers. But millions cannot access online services or have trouble navigating online. And many cannot get to regional centers. The phone line is their lifeline.

Phone lines of senators and representatives erupted minutes after the Washington Post scoop appeared. Members of Congress and others warned Trump’s White House they’d be committing political suicide. Trump’s inner circle — suddenly alerted — got it, bigtime. What the hell was this really about? DOGE’s Musketeers had discovered 40 percent of Social Security’s actual direct-deposit fraud comes when beneficiaries use telephones to change their direct-deposit routing numbers.

Team Trump quickly got it and reversed the huge plan to scrap free phone help for seniors; except for the one narrow purpose of providing direct-deposit banking information. Within hours, Trump’s Social Security officials issued an announcement of a common-sense change: Social Security “will no longer process changes to direct-deposit routing numbers over the phone,” Reuters reported, “but its other telephone services would remain unchanged.”

That initial leak to the Washington Post ended up giving Trump’s discombobulated White House time to rethink, recombobulate; and rescue its president from suffering the consequences of worst instincts of Musk and his team.

But … oh no, Mister Donald! Team Trump ended up allowing itself just one day of rescued common-sense comfort. The day after that Washington Post scoop erupted online and Social Security officials responded by announcing there would only be a narrowly limited ban on processing direct deposit info by phone, a highly placed official wrote a memo outlining yet another extensive plan to cut other telephone help services used by elderly beneficiaries.

Of course, that March 13 memo also leaked. It was reported on March 17, in an online newsletter named Popular Information; and was quickly confirmed by Axios and The Washington Post. The memo estimated that 75,000 to 85,000 customers per week would have to somehow go to Social Security’s local field offices to provide basic information. It conceded that effort would mean “increased challenges for vulnerable populations” and “longer wait times and processing time.” Also, all that would be made much more difficult because Musk’s team was proposing to close many field offices and cut personnel. On Thursday, Social Security announced that the memo’s proposal was now official policy. It just became much harder for the elderly and disabled to get their entitled benefits.

And so it goes. In Trump’s Presidency 2.0, the right hand doesn’t seem to know what the far-right hand is doing.

Martin Schram, an op-ed columnist for Tribune News Service, is a veteran Washington journalist, author and TV documentary executive. Email him at martin.schram@gmail.com. ©2025 Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

An apartment building under construction in Olympia, Washington in January 2025. Critics of a proposal to cap rent increases in Washington argue that it could stifle new development. (Photo by Bill Lucia/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Lawmakers should seek deal to keep rent cap at 7%

Now that rent stabilization has passed both chambers, a deal on a reasonable cap must be struck.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, April 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Social Security shield we need from volatile markets

After what we’ve seen this month from markets, we should guard the stability Old Age Insurance offers.

Don’t cut vital spending on health from state budget

The residents of Washington did not create the state’s current budget issues,… Continue reading

Restore funding for lung cancer research

This year, more than 226,000 people will be diagnosed with lung cancer,… Continue reading

Men, listen to Fox; save your masculinity from women

According to Fox News’ Jesse Watters, tariffs will bring back manly jobs… Continue reading

Ask yourself who’s next for El Salvador prison

El Salvador President Nayib Bukele and Presidetn Trump agree that Kilmer Abrego… Continue reading

The sun sets beyond the the Evergreen Branch of the Everett Public Library as a person returns some books on Friday, Nov. 11, 2022, in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Reverse ruinous cuts to federal library program

The Trump administration’s shuttering of the IMLS will be felt at the local and state levels.

Kids play on glacial erratic in the Martha Lake Airport Park on Friday, May 4, 2018 in Lynnwood, Wa. The Glacial erratic rock in the park is one of the largest in urban King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties. (Andy Bronson / The Herald)
Editorial: Little park at Martha Lake an example of success

For 35 years, a state program has secured vital funding for parks, habitat, forests and farmland.

South County Fire and Rescue crews responded after a dump truck crashed into an Edmonds home and knocked out power lines last September. (Courtesy of South County Fire)
Editorial: Edmonds voters, study up on fire district vote

Voters need to weigh issues of taxes, service and representation before casting their ballots.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, April 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Welch: State tax proposals will punish workers, businesses

A range of proposed tax legislation piles costs on families, rather than looking for spending cuts.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.