Commentary: Environmental efforts not showing good results

We need to be good stewards, but some restrictions and rules only result in friction and resistance.

By Dan Bartelheimer

There has to be a better way. Our environment does not appear to be improving in spite of the multitude of rules, regulations and penalties for violations.

One hundred and fifty years ago the area was forested and undeveloped and the fish and wildlife were abundant. Today, the virgin timber and most of the second-growth has been harvested, cities and urban sprawl has replaced much of the native wildlife habit, and there is a lot of infrastructure in place.

Federal and state agencies have been established with the intent to protect and enhance the environment. The direction most agencies have pursued to accomplish their objective has been through restrictive rules and regulations that take away property rights and impose great penalties when violated. Greater buffers near sensitive areas may not be providing the desired protection. Little is devoted to encouraging responsible stewardship. Rewarding and acknowledgment for doing the right thing is seldom done.

Fish numbers have continued to plummet. The expensive fish habitat restoration projects in the Snohomish river estuary may be a start, but how effective remains to be seen. A lot of money that is being spent on restoration projects appears to be allocated towards landscaping and beautification. Much of it will be destroyed within a short time from natural events.

Picking and choosing what we are protecting will fail. We need to be good stewards of all. If something is sacrificed today, we may find it necessary to place restrictive sanctions on it tomorrow.

In order for something to be accepted and successful, it needs to be beneficial to those whom it may impact. By taking property rights from a selective few in order to try in accomplish making improvements for the majority will create friction and resistance. If the greater majority will benefit by the actions and sacrifices of a minority, the majority should be willing to compensate for those sacrifices.

It may be less expensive, have greater success, and have better acceptance by a wider spectrum of the populace if the gist of the efforts were reward-driven rather than through threat of the law and penalties.

The efforts of one or a few will help but to make an impact and be successful, the greater community must be receptive and be proactive.

Responsible stewardship will require:

Education starting with our youth at an early age.

Self-respect and taking care of oneself.

Passion, sacrifices and willingness to do the right thing.

Acknowledgement and rewards along with compensation for taken property rights.

Cooperation and collusion from within both the private and authoritative communities.

When one is prevented from doing the right thing because the burden of the law requires more money, time or effort than one can justify, then a change needs to be made. But when we all work together then much will be accomplished.

Dan Bartelheimer is president of the Snohomish County Farm Bureau.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, April 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Snow dusts the treeline near Heather Lake Trailhead in the area of a disputed logging project on Tuesday, April 11, 2023, outside Verlot, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Move ahead with state forests’ carbon credit sales

A judge clears a state program to set aside forestland and sell carbon credits for climate efforts.

State needs to assure better rail service for Amtrak Cascades

The Puget Sound region’s population is expected to grow by 4 million… Continue reading

Trump’s own words contradict claims of Christian faith

In a recent letter to the editor regarding Christians and Donald Trump,… Continue reading

Comment: Israel should choose reasoning over posturing

It will do as it determines, but retaliation against Iran bears the consequences of further exchanges.

Comment: Ths slow but sure progress of Brown v. Board

Segregation in education remains, as does racism, but the case is a milestone of the 20th century.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, April 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A new apple variety, WA 64, has been developed by WSU's College of Agricultural, Human and Natural Resource Sciences. The college is taking suggestions on what to name the variety. (WSU)
Editorial: Apple-naming contest fun celebration of state icon

A new variety developed at WSU needs a name. But take a pass on suggesting Crispy McPinkface.

Apply ‘Kayden’s Law’ in Washington’s family courts

Next session, our state Legislature must pass legislation that clarifies how family… Continue reading

What religious icons will Trump sell next?

My word! So now Donald Trump is in the business of selling… Continue reading

Commen: ‘Civil War’ movie could prompt some civil discourse

The dystopian movie serves to warn against division and for finding common ground in our concerns.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.