Commentary: Letting jobless benefit expire is economic folly

Some 30 million Americans still depend on that $600 weekly benefit, and so does our economy.

By Jared Bernstein / The Washington Post

There is a good chance that because of congressional inaction, the $600 per week additional unemployment benefit that’s been in place throughout the pandemic-induced recession will expire at the end of this month, if not sooner (for technical reasons, the last benefit checks go out July 25).

To label this as political malpractice is way too polite. I’d argue it’s one of the most egregious examples of dysfunctional, destructive politics in an era when such examples abound. It will hurt the most economically vulnerable people at a time when, even with recent gains, the number of job seekers exceeds jobs by a wide margin. More than 30 million people are receiving unemployment benefits right now, and this problem of oversupplied, under-demanded labor is getting worse, not better. Because the coronavirus is spreading at a newly accelerated rate, leading to yet another round of retrenched commerce, employment gains appear to be shifting into reverse.

Ending the higher benefits will also hurt the overall economy, and in a big way. On an annualized basis, the loss of the $600 weekly benefit would leave a hole of more than $800 billion, almost 4 percent of GDP in an economy that’s struggling to reopen.

But really, to blame “congressional inaction” for this potential debacle is far too vague. As Politico put it, the benefits expire “if lawmakers follow Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s proposed timeline for the next round of pandemic aid.” This timeline is completely inconsistent with comments McConnell, R-Ky., made a few weeks back, when he touted a wait-and-see attitude as to whether another relief package would be warranted. It would take some time, he cautioned, to “see what’s working, see what isn’t.”

Well, we’ve waited, and we’ve seen: The virus is spreading faster than ever, and that’s posing a serious threat to the recovery. The rationale for sustained unemployment insurance (UI) benefits remains strong, a fact with which McConnell himself appears to agree. Earlier this week, he told reporters, “When my members come back next week, we’ll start socializing [UI plans] with them.”

Sorry, but the time for socializing has long passed. The only explanations for the lapse are lethargy, dysfunction and a checked-out cluelessness as to what most people are going through right now; perfectly in keeping with the Trump White House’s “find something new!” campaign, which tells the unemployed to just get out there, get a new skill and find an exciting new job (they neglect to mention that the unemployment rate, at 11.1 percent, is still higher than the worst month of the last recession).

I understand that Republicans want to consider alternatives to the expiring $600 weekly plus-up. The Post reported this week that “with the benefits soon set to expire and the economy showing new signs of strain,” the Trump administration was open to some version of another expansion, though at a lower level than the current $600 a week, as they worry that that amount will incentivize workers to reject jobs at lower incomes.

That’s a reasonable debate to have, though again, the problem facing job seekers isn’t too much UI; it’s not enough jobs. Work disincentives are only binding when there’s work.

But what’s not reasonable is to be having this debate when benefits are lapsing. Ever since the UI plus-up was passed as part of the Cares Act in late March, the July deadline was etched in stone. With the pandemic re-spiking, a complete national leadership vacuum on virus control, the economy sort of opening and now sort of closing again, the open question of what’s happening with schools and the absence of child-care options if schools fail to restart fully, people are already suffering tremendous uncertainty and insecurity.

For congressional Republicans to pile on by letting crucially important benefits expire — even for a few weeks while they “socialize” their way toward some solution — is completely unacceptable. They need to stop messing around, grasp the urgency of the moment and fix this before July 25.

Jared Bernstein, chief economist to former vice president Joe Biden, is a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, March 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The WA Cares law is designed to give individuals access to a lifetime benefit amount that, should they need it, they can use on a wide range of long-term services and supports. (Washington State Department of Social and Health Services)
Editorial: Changes to WA Cares will honor voters’ confidence

State lawmakers are considering changes to improve the benefit’s access and long-term stability.

Burke: If Canada won’t join U.S., our state could look north

There are more pluses than minuses to becoming the 11th province, including an easy-to-sing anthem.

Comment: Governor should reconsider pulling fisheries expert

Gov. Ferguson, without explanation, canceled the reappointment of a Fish & Wildlife panel member.

Comment: U.S. allies get the message in Signal debacle

It’s clear what U.S. officials think of ouor allies, but so to is the administration’s ineptitude.

Comment: ‘Adolescence’ should wake us to plight of boys

The Netflix series delves into how boys and young men have fallen for toxic role models on social media.

Comment: Trump-onomics made sense to voters; less so now

The president’s trade war and other economic policies are wars of choice. He will own their effects.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Keep journalism vital with state grant program

Legislation proposes a modest tax for some tech companies to help pay salaries of local journalists.

A semiautomatic handgun with a safety cable lock that prevents loading ammunition. (Dan Bates / The Herald)
Editorial: Adopt permit-to-purchase gun law to cut deaths

Requiring training and a permit to buy a firearm could reduce deaths, particularly suicides.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: One option for pausing pay raise for state electeds

Only a referendum could hold off pay increases for state lawmakers and others facing a budget crisis.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, March 25

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, March 24

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.