Consider costs of Housing Hope project on taxes, neighborhood

Have you heard the term “housing first”? It is a housing model that has been studied around the nation. There are many ways to implement this model and conflicting published data on successful implementation methods. It is further complicated with mixed results for addiction and mental health housing retention.

All the conflicting research and results lead many people to wonder where Washington state will achieve the best benefits with taxpayer dollars. Recent law changes have loosened regulations and led to more questions regarding taxpayer costs versus benefits of these tools. For instance, the city of Everett passed an ordinance in 2016 that waived the planning and zoning requirements for supportive housing developments on public land.

An example is the proposed supportive housing project located at the Norton Avenue playfield. Norton Avenue playfield is owned by the Everett School District and the proposed lease gives the property to Housing Hope for $1 a year for 75 years. Housing Hope will build a majority of this development with state and federal grants (taxpayer dollars) and then bring in tenants who will pay rent with taxpayer subsidies. The financial costs stack up for taxpayers but so do the social and environmental costs. Increased housing density and loss of open spaces, recreation areas, stormwater retention and habitat. These are large costs that may never be recovered.

The city of Everett is putting a lot of focus on the concept of a housing first model. This might be a great regional approach with a detailed plan, transparent implementation process, and defined success metrics. However, no one community should have a disproportionate amount of supportive services and housing projects, and the city of Everett should not bear disproportionate costs in Snohomish County. Region representatives, including the city of Everett, must work together to gain taxpayer trust by implementing a housing plan that includes measurable success metrics region-wide.

Lindsey Jungbluth


Talk to us

More in Opinion

October 20, 2020: Scaring the voters
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Oct. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Paul J. Lawrence, attorney for the Legislature, addresses justices during a hearing before the Washington Supreme Court Tuesday, June 11, 2019, in Olympia, Wash. The court heard oral arguments in the case that will determine whether state lawmakers are subject to the same disclosure rules that apply to other elected officials under the voter-approved Public Records Act. The hearing before the high court was an appeal of a case that was sparked by a September 2017 lawsuit filed by a media coalition, led by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: Montoya-Lewis, Whitener for state Supreme Court

Both justices’ legal experience is further informed by their perspectives as women and minorities.

Kristen Welker on the "Today" show in January. MUST CREDIT: Nathan Congleton/NBC
Comment: How debate moderator can deliver useful discussion

NBC’s Kristen Welker can take some tips from Savannah Guthrie to keep control of the questioning.

Comment: Democrats shouldn’t retaliate; they should legislate

Rather than packing the court, they can heed the court’s ‘texualists’ and pass laws that protect policy.

Stop throwing your used face masks on the ground

Hey! Stop tossing your used masks on the ground all over kingdom… Continue reading

44th LD, House, Pos. 2: Berg offers varied experience, insights

April Berg is the kind of elected House representative we need for… Continue reading

38th LD, Senate: Moody offers fresh perspective

Finally, someone who will represent the people and not special interests. Never… Continue reading

Gov. Inslee unworthy of trust

I am appalled by the lack of journalistic integrity employed by The… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Oct. 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Most Read