Consider costs of Housing Hope project on taxes, neighborhood

Have you heard the term “housing first”? It is a housing model that has been studied around the nation. There are many ways to implement this model and conflicting published data on successful implementation methods. It is further complicated with mixed results for addiction and mental health housing retention.

All the conflicting research and results lead many people to wonder where Washington state will achieve the best benefits with taxpayer dollars. Recent law changes have loosened regulations and led to more questions regarding taxpayer costs versus benefits of these tools. For instance, the city of Everett passed an ordinance in 2016 that waived the planning and zoning requirements for supportive housing developments on public land.

An example is the proposed supportive housing project located at the Norton Avenue playfield. Norton Avenue playfield is owned by the Everett School District and the proposed lease gives the property to Housing Hope for $1 a year for 75 years. Housing Hope will build a majority of this development with state and federal grants (taxpayer dollars) and then bring in tenants who will pay rent with taxpayer subsidies. The financial costs stack up for taxpayers but so do the social and environmental costs. Increased housing density and loss of open spaces, recreation areas, stormwater retention and habitat. These are large costs that may never be recovered.

The city of Everett is putting a lot of focus on the concept of a housing first model. This might be a great regional approach with a detailed plan, transparent implementation process, and defined success metrics. However, no one community should have a disproportionate amount of supportive services and housing projects, and the city of Everett should not bear disproportionate costs in Snohomish County. Region representatives, including the city of Everett, must work together to gain taxpayer trust by implementing a housing plan that includes measurable success metrics region-wide.

Lindsey Jungbluth

Everett

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Thursday, July 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Editorial: What history is owed through our monuments

The decisions regarding whom we honor in our public squares require deliberation and consensus.

Commentary: COVID has made working moms’ struggle clear

The difficulties and inequities for working moms haven’t changed. What has is the urgency for change.

Commentary: Little to like about Facebook’s content management

Unimpressed by an advertising boycott, the social network is resisting simple reforms to control hate speech.

Face masks should not be a political statement

It shouldn’t even be an issue but for some wearing a face… Continue reading

Everett didn’t enforce its law on fireworks

When is a law not a law? When it is not enforced.… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Editorial: It’s not just baseball that we may have to wait for

The AquaSox season is canceled. But if we don’t get a grip on COVID, we risk losing much more.

Editorial: Everett police reforms a template for others

The department’s response to an on-camera arrest shows the value of its recent reforms in policing.

Most Read