Creating reality today

  • Ellen Goodman / Boston Globe columnist
  • Monday, May 20, 2002 9:00pm
  • Opinion

BOSTON — It was a scene beyond insult. In the Pakistani courtroom, the grisly videotape of Danny Pearl’s murder had played three times.

This tape was made as a boast, not a confession. Its "highlights" now circulate as a recruitment tool, not a guilty plea. Join us and you too can murder a young American journalist.

But the lawyer for the four men accused of murder dismissed this video airily as "very weak evidence." He claimed it was a fraud, a fake.

Doing so, he played to the international audience of conspiracy theorists. He spoke to the crowd that believes that the moon landing was staged, the Holocaust was a fraud, the terrorist attacks were carried out by U.S. government officials. To them, "Wag the Dog" was a documentary.

Reading this coverage, I found it easy to dismiss his outrageous claim, easier still to stand by the video as the truth.

But now I wonder how long we will be able to believe our own eyes.

On the very day the lawyer slandered this evidence, there was an unsettling tale from the cutting edge of technology. Scientists at MIT have created the first realistic videos that can show people saying things they never actually said.

The researchers taught a machine to read a face, to learn what people look like when they are talking and then to apply those expressions to other lines or languages. Even in its first stage, this talking head is far better than the "talking babies" of Hollywood fame. It is impossible to tell real from unreal. The researchers can now literally put words in our mouths.

This is not without precedent. Other, older technologies that captured reality also distorted it. Abraham Lincoln once gave Mathew Brady credit for helping him win an election with an altered and improved portrait. Joseph Stalin had the photographs of his inner circle airbrushed and updated to fit every new purge.

Now with computers animating and generating and editing, we have already gone beyond airbrushing and cropping. We have gone beyond still images to mobile ones.

When the producers of movies like "Serendipity" and "Zoolander" wanted to get rid of the Twin Towers backdrop, they simply deleted the image. When the sponsors for a sitcom change, products can be digitally placed and replaced. A Sprite on the table in prime time can turn into a Pepsi in reruns.

We have brought actors back to life with technology. Fred Astaire was exhumed to dance with a vacuum cleaner. Humphrey Bogart was resurrected to sell Coke.

Today sports fans see virtual ads on the TV field that do not grace the actual Astroturf. And one New Year’s Eve, CBS changed the face of Times Square by superimposing its own logo over NBC’s.

We have grown used to all this. We have become cynical about ads. We laugh and give Academy Awards to the hi-tech tricks that fool us in the name of entertainment. And I suppose that if MIT’s new technology is just used to allow Josh Hartnett to speak Japanese and Julia Roberts to be dubbed into Italian, few of us will notice.

But if science can erase the line between the real and the realistic, its most successful product will be doubt. Its most earnest and edgy creation will be mistrust.

Consider this: The MIT team is using a tape of "Nightline’s" Ted Koppel to see if they can dub it in Spanish. If they can put Spanish into the newscaster’s mouth, why not lies?

If we can’t tell truth and fiction apart, what happens to our trust in, say, the Rodney King tapes, or surveillance tapes, or presidential speeches? Who will draw the line then between paranoia and skepticism? Truth and propaganda?

Is this technological blowback? After all, captured images have become our proof, our truth. We rely on photographs to replace memory. We trust images more than our own eyes. When we want to check the facts we say, "Let’s go to the videotape."

But in the Information Age the same technology that informs us can also misinform us and disinform us. We have seen that on the Internet. Now will we see it, literally, on phony tapes? What can we trust?

Rumors and research circle the globe at the same speed. Fact and myth vie for attention in courtrooms and classrooms. We need, more than ever, to tell the difference. But today science, our fact-finder, is also erasing the difference.

If we can’t believe what we see, will we see only what we already believe?

Ellen Goodman can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200 or send e-mail to EllenGoodman@Globe.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

Sentencing reforms more complicated than column described

I read Todd Welch’s Jan. 29 column. He is certainly entitled to… Continue reading

President Trump running nation like his failed businesses

We’ve seen it before; President Trump will do or say anything to… Continue reading

Intent of Trump’s nominees is to subvert good government

It is clear that Donald Trump has something specific in mind with… Continue reading

Comment: Musk’s USAID shutdown an attack on most vulnerable

Even promises of ‘waivers’ are falling short and allowing medical efforts to dry up, endangering millions.

Comment: Real dangers loom with Trump’s incoherent trade policy

Even if Trump could settle on a justification for his tariffs, the results could leave the country far. weaker.

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump can go only as far as the courts will allow

Most of Trump’s executive orders are likely to face court challenges, setting the limits of presidential power.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.