By Dan Hazen / Herald Forum
I recall explaining to my daughters when they were younger that a public-school education was valuable, but for only one thing: making you a good worker. It’s important. It’s noble and worthwhile. But it does not make a citizen. It takes much more than that. What some might call “classical education” has always included other things, including art, civics, religion, logic and …virtue.
An understanding of virtue and the underlying concepts of virtue aren’t obvious in any formal educational settings I’m aware of because, I’m guessing, it’s too partisan and doesn’t turn a profit. Maybe I’m wrong on that (in fact, I’m sure I am) but my point is that training in virtue is not automatic in our society.
There is no universally accepted index of virtues. Benjamin Franklin created his own list. The Greeks batted around various lists numbering from 4 to 18. Eastern thinkers such as Confucius had varying catalogues, and there are countless others. It’s interesting how much overlap there is between these lists, regardless of origin. It seems that the raw materials which compose “virtues” are universal and acknowledged by all people as a need like food, water and shelter.
In our context, however, virtues (when addressed at all) are addressed indirectly. A result is that the Tree of Virtues has been pruned down to two stubby, bare branches: Compassion and Freedom. Virtues like Wisdom, Patience and Moderation lie decaying on the ground having been cut away in favor of the remaining two.
The unintended result of favoring any virtue over others is to slowly transform the chosen virtue into a vice. Virtues cannot exist as virtues apart form the others. A net ceases to be a net when you cut away all but one strand. What is salt if it loses its “saltiness” after all?
Freedom with no companion virtues mutates into hatred. Ever-so-slowly, those who don’t seem to value freedom as highly as we think they should, become “other,” then, “stranger,” then “threat” and finally “enemy”. All in support of freedom.
Compassion quarantined from other virtues deviates toward tyranny. Neighbors who refuse what we define as help are seen first as “ingrates,” then “ignorant,” then “threat” and finally “enemy.” All in support of compassion.
When we choose one virtue above all others, we cannot see any virtue in the position of the other who has chosen a different favorite. Hope for dialogue or unity quickly fades.
The reality of this is revealed in the strange phenomenon of propaganda from both camps becoming interchangeable. If you find the slogan of your sole virtue has, strangely, been adopted by your enemy and is now trumpeted back at you, you should pause and reflect.
I long to see how my anti-vaccine-mandate friends would behave if their commitment to freedom were equaled by a commitment to temperance. And how lovely would our community become if our social justice warriors blended some humility with their compassion. I will try to grow my courage and my patience as I wait for this.
Dan Hazen is community pastor at Allen Creek Community Church in Marysville.
Talk to us
- You can tell us about news and ask us about our journalism by emailing newstips@heraldnet.com or by calling 425-339-3428.
- If you have an opinion you wish to share for publication, send a letter to the editor to letters@heraldnet.com or by regular mail to The Daily Herald, Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.
- More contact information is here.
