Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tennessee, accompanied by the committee’s ranking member Sen. Patty Murray, D-Washington, speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington in January. (Alex Brandon/Associated Press file photo)

Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tennessee, accompanied by the committee’s ranking member Sen. Patty Murray, D-Washington, speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington in January. (Alex Brandon/Associated Press file photo)

Daydream is over; GOP must work with Democrats on ACA fix

Editorial: The Senate should end its latest ACA repeal effort and continue bipartisan talks.

By The Herald Editorial Board

In making a last-ditch effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act, Republican leadership in the U.S. Senate has advanced a bill — called Graham-Cassidy for its two primary sponsors — that is more draconian and would deny or put access to health care beyond the means of even more Americans than any of the other previous pieces of legislation.

It can’t even be considered “repeal and replace.” When Congressional Republicans couldn’t come up with a way to replace the ACA, otherwise known as Obamacare, and deliver on even basic promises to preserve protections for pre-existing conditions, those drafting Graham-Cassidy daydreamed of giving up altogether on that effort and letting the states figure it out.

As proposed, the legislation would repeal the ACA’s expansion of Medicaid and end the subsidies and cost-sharing payments that have funded or kept coverage affordable for millions of Americans, which President Trump has repeatedly threatened to end himself. It would also end the individual and employer mandates and minimum requirements on what insurance plans must cover.

Rather than continue to fund the expansion of Medicaid, the bill rolls that funding into block grants for the individual states, leaving each state to determine who will be covered and for what, as well as allowing states to make the call on whether individuals would face higher premiums for pre-existing conditions.

Washington, like other states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA, would face a loss of about $10 billion between 2020 and 2026, compared to current levels of federal spending, according to a study released recently by Avalere, a health care consulting firm.

But even that funding could be temporary. The bill only provides the block grant funding through 2026. After that point there’s no provision, no promise of continued federal funding for the states. In the end, Avalere says in its report, Washington state would see a loss of federal funding of up to $110 billion between 2020 and 2037. Nationwide, for all 50 states, that loss would represent $4.15 trillion by 2037.

There’s been a headlong rush to get to the bill passed before Sept. 30, exactly because that’s the deadline the Senate faces to pass it with only a simple majority. Which is why the Senate isn’t waiting for a report from the Congressional Budget Office to estimate its effects on how many Americans would lose coverage. Which is why at most it will face one committee hearing with no opportunities for expert testimony from the medical and insurance communities who have overwhelmingly urged the Senate to reject the bill. And which is why, even if it does pass the Senate, it can only stand for an up or down vote in the House, with no opportunity for amendments.

That’s not the regular order that Sen. John McCain urged after he cast the deciding vote against the “skinny repeal” in late July, and that may have been his thinking Friday morning in announcing he could not support Graham-Cassidy. With no Democrats supporting the bill, it can lose the support of only two Republicans and still pass.

Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky announced his opposition earlier. Sen Susan Collins of Maine is leaning against. And Alaska’s Sen. Lisa Murkowski is on the fence, according to a count of support by The Hill.

McCain may have again foiled Senate Republicans’ attempts to end Obamacare.

“I believe we could do better working together, Republicans and Democrats, and have not yet really tried,” McCain said in a statement Friday.

Actually, they have tried to a certain extent. Or had, until this most recently flirtation with denying health care coverage to millions.

After the “skinny repeal” failure, Sens. Patty Murray, D-Washington, and Lamar Alexander, R-Tennessee, held four hearings before the Senate’s Health, Education, Labor and Pensions to find agreement that would stabilize insurance markets and make the ACA work better for everyone, including getting better controls on increasing premium costs.

Alexander, the committee’s chairman, and Murray its ranking Democrat, have a history of bipartisan cooperation, having successfully reformed the No Child Left Behind program into the Every Student Succeeds Act in 2015.

Negotiations on insurance market stabilization had progressed, until last week when Alexander announced he and Murray had reached an impasse, that they had “not found the necessary consensus among Republicans and Democrats.”

Murray, in her own statement, challenged Alexander’s contention: “We’ve held hearings, we’ve had discussions that included over half the Senate, and we’ve negotiated in good faith for weeks to try (to) achieve, as Chairman Alexander puts it so well, ‘a result’ for our constituents.”

Murray’s office confirms that the senator had made concessions to Republican requests to give states greater flexibility regarding the ACA.

Those talks ended last week when GOP arm-twisting led Alexander to announce the “impasse.”

Murray, following McCain’s announcement on Friday, said she was ready to return to the table. “I remain confident that we can reach a bipartisan agreement as soon as this latest partisan approach by Republican leaders is finally set aside.”

Summer is over, and with it Republican daydreams of turning over to the states the sole responsibility of assuring health care coverage for Americans.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Franklin’s considered approach warrants third term

The incumbent mayor has used innovation and concern for all residents to guide her leadership.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, July 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: New tax adds to burden of those in long-term care

Little discussed, the tax doubles or triples annual per-bed fees that will be passed on to families.

Comment: BPA adds to long history of poor resource management

A decision to join a far-flung energy market echoes past decisions detrimental to ratepayers and salmon.

Comment: State got cheaper ferries and a policy rebuke

Accepting a contract for Florida-built ferries should tell lawmakers something about taxes and regulations.

Forum: Don’t dismiss potential for controlled supply of drugs

Contrary to a columnist’s views, supplying drugs to those with addictions has led to better outcomes elsewhere.

Forum: Book discussion explores police response to white supremacy

The forum, Sunday in Everett features former FBI agent Michael German and his book, ‘Policing White Supremacy.’

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, July 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Elect Hem, Rhyne, Burbano to Everett council seats

The Aug. 5 primary will determine the top two candidates for Council Districts 1, 2 and 4.

The Buzz: Can we please stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein?

Yeah, I didn’t think so. It’s hard to brand something as a hoax when you won’t stop talking abou it.

Schwab: Rosie O’Donnell, immigrants and other Epstein distractions

MAGA puts up with the outrages because empathy is reserved only for their own prejudices.

Harrop: Will America ever recover from what Trump has wrought?

Pundits and psychiatrists can debate why. We need to answer whether we can restore what is being lost.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.