Debate over pledge shouldn’t divide U.S.

Most people, it appears, have learned more about the Pledge of Allegiance in the last few days than they ever knew, even after 13 years of reciting it faithfully every school day. That’s just one of the many ironies surrounding the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision last week that the words "under God" in the pledge are unconstitutional.

Many were surprised to learn that the now controversial words were added in 1954 in the thick of the Cold War. Further, that the author of the pledge, Francis Bellamy, was an ordained minister. Certainly, some suggest, if a minister didn’t include the words "under God" originally, why should anyone else do so later on?

But it’s the removal of the words that now has many upset, even angry. Just as the idea of keeping them in the pledge upsets and angers others. Both sides make very valid points.

It is unfair to declare this decision a liberal attack as many have done already. Several liberal politicians reacted with as much surprise as their conservative counterparts. One Democrat went so far as to suggest a constitutional amendment. It is equally unfair to declare the unhappy reaction by so many people as a poor reflection upon the current administration and Congress. This is not the first time our country has debated the matter and it won’t be the last. Such accusations do nothing to resolve the matter or induce healthy discussion. They only serve to further divide us.

One of the concerns at the core of this is the belief that the federal court’s decision is an attack on God and another step toward erasing him from our country entirely. It is important to remember that our courts are not charged with the responsibility of carrying out the will or motivations of those who bring about such lawsuits. Our courts must consider the well-being of the country, in alignment with our Constitution. Remember, the courts have protected various religions in the past. They protected Jehovah’s Witnesses who objected to reciting the Pledge of Allegiance, by deciding the recitation was not mandatory after all. Now, the courts will have to decide if children who desperately want to show their patriotism can do so without having to acknowledge a God they might not believe exists.

Removing God from our country would be virtually impossible. Whatever the various religious inclinations of our forefathers, they made significant mention of God in the Declaration of Independence. In fact, they determined, in part, that we deserved the right to form our own country because of the "Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God." And that people have certain rights "endowed by their Creator."

Just a couple of weeks ago we wrote a Flag Day editorial encouraging readers to check out a Web site that shared facts, including words that had been added to the pledge over the years. We had no idea we would be writing about the same issue in such a different light. But the matter of eliminating the controversial phrase is certainly worth more investigation and consideration.

As Ken Paulson, executive director of the First Amendment Center, said in a recent column, the two phrases, "under God" and "liberty and justice for all" are not mutually exclusive. If this country hopes to reach a healthy compromise, perhaps it is time we focused on another critical phrase in our pledge — indivisible.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Feb. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

Welch: State Democrats’ bill would undermine parental rights

The bill would allow kids as young as 13 to make mental health decisions without notice to parents.

Kristof: Child malnutrition lost in politics over aid cuts

A young journalist describes the scene in Madagascar where a nutritious porridge provides a lifeline.

Comment: Trump sticks with NOAA official who bent to his ego

We haven’t seen the last of Trump’s Sharpie-amended reality and it’s destabilizing effect on scientists.

Dowd: Musk’s ‘Lost Boys’ join Trump’s ‘Mean Girls’ ethic to gut it all

Neither man shows any concern for the damage they threaten against individuals here and abroad.

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Sentencing reforms more complicated than column described

I read Todd Welch’s Jan. 29 column. He is certainly entitled to… Continue reading

President Trump running nation like his failed businesses

We’ve seen it before; President Trump will do or say anything to… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.