Democrats are deeply divided over tax cuts

  • David Broder / Washington Post columnist
  • Saturday, May 19, 2001 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — When politicians talk about "wedge issues," they usually are referring to hot social controversies — guns, school prayer, abortion and the like.

But this year, the biggest wedge issue Republicans have found to distract the Democrats is taxes. The Democrats are more deeply divided on President Bush’s tax cut than on any other issue Congress faces.

In the House, where the plan was voted on in parts, as many as 58 Democrats defected to join the GOP. The effects in the Senate have been even more divisive. Tom Daschle of South Dakota, the Senate Democratic leader, usually has extraordinary success in keeping his caucus unified, even though he is dealing with big egos and widely varying viewpoints. But this tax cut has been more than even Daschle could defang.

His troubles began when Sen. Zell Miller of Georgia, a newcomer, popped out unexpectedly to co-sponsor with Texas Republican Sen. Phil Gramm an early version of the tax cut Bush had outlined in the campaign. Miller’s defection in a 50-50 Senate caught Daschle flatfooted and signaled trouble ahead.

A larger problem emerged when Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, newly elevated to the ranking Democratic spot on the Senate Finance Committee, decided on his own to become the best buddy of the committee’s new chairman, Iowa Republican Chuck Grassley.

Baucus phoned Grassley soon after the election and, over breakfast, suggested that they get together weekly to keep each other apprised of sentiments within their party caucuses, and that they try to draft the tax bill together.

Several factors served to facilitate cooperation. The Finance Committee has a tradition of bipartisanship. Grassley is an unpretentious, old-shoe politician, whose great strength is his straight-talk reputation. Baucus comes from a small-population state where politicians are not allowed to put on airs.

Political circumstances also impelled them to look across party lines. Baucus is running for re-election next year in Montana, which went strongly for Bush. Grassley’s home state of Iowa voted twice for Clinton and then narrowly for Gore.

But the main motivation for both of them was a shared belief that if, as seemed certain, a big tax bill were to pass, it should reflect some of the elements important to both parties.

And that is what they have written — a bill that returns $1.35 trillion of (hypothetically) surplus government revenues to the taxpayers over the next 11 years. Some Republicans wish the total were higher, closer to the $1.6 trillion over 10 years that Bush wanted, and they wish the marginal rate reductions were bigger — cutting the top levy to 33 percent, as Bush proposed, rather than the 36 percent for which Grassley settled.

But bruised feelings among Republicans are modest compared with the screams of indignation from Daschle and many other Democrats at the deal that Baucus cut. Four of the 10 Finance Committee Democrats joined all 10 of its Republicans in endorsing the bill. But the other six — and a clear majority of the Democratic caucus — think that Baucus sold out the party.

The evidence is mixed. The liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, in its analysis of the Grassley-Baucus bill, says it "would provide significant new assistance to low- and moderate-income working families. … In this area, the proposal is a major improvement over both the House legislation and the administration’s plan."

The richest Americans, this analysis says, will not do quite as well as they would under the Bush plan, but overall the benefits are still heavily tilted to the top fifth of the taxpayers. The net effect will be to increase the growing income gap between affluent Americans and the rest of the nation.

These effects are enough to repel most Democrats. And they remain troubled by the overall size of the package. Revenue projections 10 years out are risky, and the Bush budget assumptions about the costs of needed domestic and defense programs look unrealistic. Locking in a tax cut of these dimensions could be a huge gamble with the nation’s fiscal future.

Baucus told me he too worries whether there will be enough money left to finance a prescription drug benefit for senior citizens. He’s also uncomfortable with a complete phase-out of inheritance taxes, which will benefit only the wealthiest of Americans. But he has no sympathy for Democrats who oppose the measure. "It’s been difficult for some of them to recognize that we are in the minority; we don’t control the White House or the Senate or the House. So we have to do the best with what we’ve got."

As for the demonstration of Democratic disunity, Baucus said, "I don’t think most people are worrying about the Democrats’ position. They’re looking forward to a tax cut."

But the wedge has been driven deep within the Democratic Party by this issue.

David Broder can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Monday, Dec. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Susanna Johnson delivers preliminary election results stating she is in the lead for the Snohomish County Sheriff 2023 election at 230 Ave B. in Snohomish, Washington on Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2023. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Editorial: Incoming sheriff seeks outreach to strengthen trust

Susanna Johnson, a 30-year veteran of the agency, is emphasizing professionalism and transparency.

Comment: Where have you gone, Archie Bunker?

‘All in the Family’ might not make it on TV now, but we need that shared space it offered to left and right.

Eco-Nomics: Snohomish PUD turning a light on climate success

The public electric utility is leading in efforts to aid in our transition to emission-free energy.

Comment: More work needed after mixed report on State of Sound

The Puget Sound Partnership’s latest report points to areas of the environment that need our efforts.

Climate protestors are removed after interrupting a speech by Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell at the 24th Jacques Polak Research Conference at the International Monetary Fund on Thursday, Nov. 9, 2023 in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)
Comment: Taking financial interest in costs of climate crisis

Chairman Jerome Powell says the Fed is not a climate policymaker. Here’s exactly why it should be.

Thanks to Nehring, Mead for Building Bridges effort

I want to give a huge thank you to Snohomish County Council… Continue reading

The Everett City Council approved a $375,000 settlement Wednesday with a former firefighter who alleged racist harassment went unaddressed in the department.
Editorial: Fosse shouldn’t have to choose between elected roles

The Everett City Council can bar its members from other offices, but should not do so retroactively.

Ben Ramirez is doused with water by teammates after the AquaSox beat the Emeralds to clinch a playoff berth on Monday, Sept. 4, 2023, in Everett. (Photo provided by AquaSox)
Editorial: City’s $1 million an investment in Everett baseball

Contracts for preliminary work on an AquaSox stadium honor team’s 40 years of family fun and tradition.

civic health white board
Editorial: Improving civic health starts by coming to table

Efforts locally and at the state level seek to counter the incivility that has mired public discourse.

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Dec. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Lynnwood Council’s Binda no different than George Santos

According to the New York Times, the House Ethics Committee concluded that… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.