Dems would be smart to back rainy day fund

If Democrats expect to keep the comfortable majorities they enjoy in both the houses of the Legislature, they’ll need to convince moderate voters that they’re spending tax dollars carefully. If they earn a reputation for squandering money – a picture Republicans will surely try to paint – power could quickly tilt back toward the GOP.

It’s in Democrats’ interest to join Senate Republicans, and Democratic Gov. Chris Gregoire, in approving a constitutionally protected rainy day reserve fund. A constitutional amendment requires two-thirds approval in both houses, then a public vote, so broad Democratic support is required.

This idea isn’t new – it’s been raised several times over the years, and was introduced last year by GOP Sen. Joe Zarelli. Gregoire has embraced it this year, adding a modest counterbalance to her aggressive 2007-09 spending plan and giving the issue momentum.

Details of plans proposed by Republicans and Gregoire are mostly the same: 1 percent of state general revenues would be set aside in a rainy day fund each year, and it would take a 60 percent legislative majority to tap it during good economic times. Once the balance exceeds 10 percent of general-fund revenues, excess money could be spent with a simple majority.

In the one key area of disagreement, we think the Republicans have it right. Gregoire’s plan would allow a simple majority to tap the fund if the governor declares an emergency; Republicans would still require 60 percent support. That’s reasonable, because a meaningful rainy-day fund shouldn’t be easy to tap. If a true emergency exists, a supermajority vote won’t be hard to muster.

Some Democrats think a constitutional amendment is either a gimmick or overkill. We doubt most taxpayers would agree. Institutional pressures to launch new spending programs or enhance existing ones can be overwhelming. Unless saving is required, it’s not likely to happen.

Local governments – counties, cities, school districts – maintain reserve funds for unforeseen events, just as families should. The state should be no different. It’s the prudent, responsible thing to do.

For legislative Democrats, it’s smart politics, too.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, March 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: One option for pausing pay raise for state electeds

Only a referendum could hold off pay increases for state lawmakers and others facing a budget crisis.

Friedman: Rule of law is on the line in Israel and the U.S.

Both Trump and Netanyahu appear poised to force constitutional crises in their quests for power.

Comment: ‘Forced joy’ is alienating employees and customers

Starbucks baristas must now doodle greetings on cups. It’s the wrong way to win engagement.

Comment: How long can Musk count on being White House fixture?

With Musk’s popularity suffering from his DOGE cuts, his money may not keep him in Trump’s good graces.

Comment: Have lawmakers forgotten they have constituents?

Some, particularly in the GOP, are begging out of town halls. Others are trying to limit initiatives.

Comment: Jury’s still out on economy, except for road report

Regardless of opinions on the eventual strength of the U.S. economy, getting there will be bumpy.

**EMBARGO: No electronic distribution, Web posting or street sales before Saturday at 3:00 a.m. ET on Mar. 1, 2025. No exceptions for any reasons. EMBARGO set by source.** House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, (D-NY) speaks at a news conference about Republicans’ potential budget cuts to Medicaid, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Feb. 27, 2025. As Republicans push a budget resolution through Congress that will almost certainly require Medicaid cuts to finance a huge tax reduction, Democrats see an opening to use the same strategy in 2026 that won them back the House in 2018. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Editorial: Don’t gut Medicaid for richest Americans’ tax cuts

Extending tax cuts, as promised by Republicans, would likely force damaging cuts to Medicaid.

Comment: Learning costs of ignoring environment the hard way

EPA chief Lee Zeldin can’t flip a switch on protections, but we’ll lose precious momentum on climate.

Comment: What promise to ‘review the data’ could mean for health

Noncommittal responses from the FDA nominee show a willingness to follow Trump’s whims, not science.

Two workers walk past a train following a press event at the Lynnwood City Center Link Station on Friday, June 7, 2024, in Lynnwood, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Open Sound Transit CEO hiring to public review

One finalist is known; the King County executive. All finalists should make their pitch to the public.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.