Dissent, as evidenced by Sid Schwab, can be patriotic

Apparently because she does not like what Sid Schwab writes, Linda Jinkins of Arlington asserts in a letter to the editor that he “is no patriot, whatever he says.” I ask, by what definition?

Her letter describes “many thousands of patriotic Americans flying flags” on the National Mall. While those thousands likely are in fact patriotic, how does she know that? Because they flew flags on the Fourth of July? I submit there is more to patriotism.

Many citizens who deeply love this country are concerned about and critical of our nation’s direction and of our currently elected leaders. Are all those citizens unpatriotic? Should they move, as she encourages Sid Schwab to do to Cuba or Venezuela?

Isn’t it our fundamental right and responsibility to speak up when we think we see problems? Even, and maybe even especially, when our speech is critical of the government?

Finally a near universally accepted demonstration of patriotism in this country is service in our armed forces. Dr. Sid Schwab did just that, overseas, in time of war. Disagree with him all you like. Ignore him if you want. But calling him unpatriotic because you don’t agree with him misses the point of what our citizenship is all about.

Michael Downes

Everett

Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, July 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Joe Kennedy, a former assistant football coach at Bremerton High School in Bremerton, Wash., poses for a photo March 9, 2022, at the school's football field. After losing his coaching job for refusing to stop kneeling in prayer with players and spectators on the field immediately after football games, Kennedy will take his arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, April 25, 2022, saying the Bremerton School District violated his First Amendment rights by refusing to let him continue praying at midfield after games. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Editorial: Court majority weakens church, state separation

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision does more to hurt religious liberty than protect a coach’s prayer.

Dan Hazen
Dan Hazen: Political labels set fight, leave out the middle

‘Conservative’ and ‘liberal’ don’t address each sides’ true motivations and ignore collaboration we need.

Jeremy Steiner: Look again; you might see reason to celebrate

Despite our worries, Americans have a lot to celebrate as the nation marks its 246th birthday.

Comment: Celebrating independence while facing inequality

The 19th century essayist Paul Dunbar challenged white Americans to confront the racism borne from slavery.

Comment: Next big gun fight will focus on where to allow guns

The Supreme Court’s recent decision allows that guns can be resticted in ‘sensitive’ areas. What does that mean?

Commentary: Oliver North, Trump share a hold on populist base

Playing to the fears of Christian nationalists, both wrongly claim an exclusive right to patriotism and God.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, July 1

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Schwab: May it please the court; because the rest of us aren’t

The Supreme Court’s ‘Sanctimonious Six’ have enshrined a theocratic plutocracy in the the law.

Most Read