Doctors have right, duty to discuss gun safety

In a nation with more than 30,000 annual deaths from gunfire, and more than 70,000 injuries, promoting the safe storage and handling of guns is an obvious task for public health professionals. At least, it should be.

As a paper published online last week at the Annals of Internal Medicine argues, physicians have both a legal right and professional duty to ask patients about gun ownership and storage. Doctors routinely ask about other risk factors, including cigarettes and alcohol. And a 2003 study suggested that counseling on gun safety had a positive influence on safe storage of firearms. At least 278 people were accidentally shot by children in 2015; so far this year, the tally is at least 94. When toddlers are shooting mothers, the need for safe gun practices couldn’t be more obvious.

But in its quest to elevate the Second Amendment to a place so sacred that questions about guns are deemed blasphemous, the gun movement has concluded that physicians who deal with the gruesome consequences of gun violence have no business trying to prevent more of it.

The movement is finding support from courts as well as legislators. In December, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld Florida’s “docs vs. Glocks” law, which restricts the speech and professional parameters of physicians, preventing doctors from asking questions that some gun owners might find intrusive. The law, which the court has agreed to reconsider en banc, is a sad jumble. It seeks to protect sensitive gun owners from discomfort while still allowing “good faith” inquiries by physicians if questions are “relevant.”

But because physicians who violate the law are subject to discipline by the Florida Board of Medicine, they may simply opt out of conversation entirely rather than depend on others to decide who acts in good faith, and which questions are relevant.

This is how extreme ideology compounds tragedy. Other states, including Missouri and Montana, have dabbled in restrictions on doctors as legislators cater to a gun movement that is growing more extreme.

Remarks from the podium at this weekend’s annual meeting of the National Rifle Association are sure to feature a long list of bogeymen, although some old favorites — like President Barack Obama, who never did get around to confiscating everyone’s guns — may be supplanted by some new ones. (Safe prediction: The NRA will say that Hillary Clinton now wants to confiscate them.)

The gun movement has an interest in fomenting paranoia. Public officials don’t. Confidential questions about gun habits, like questions about driving, smoking and drinking, are legitimate medical inquiries. Legislators in Florida and elsewhere should make it clear that physicians who competently perform their jobs will not be punished.

The above editorial appears on Bloomberg View,

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Thursday, March 23

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Cathlamet, the Washington State Ferry that crashed in Seattle last month, sits at the Port of Everett on Thursday, Aug. 25, 2022, in Everett, Washington. The ferry will require extensive repairs after a hard landing crumpled one corner of the boat at the Fauntleroy dock on July 28. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: State needs quicker route for its new ferries

‘Build in Washington’ can be scraped as a mandate, while still counting benefits of in-state shipyards.

Standard time is the better fit for our body rhythms

Regarding a recent letter to the editor about sticking with either daylight… Continue reading

Herald denied ‘Dilbert’ author his First Amendment rights

Being on vacation I missed the tempest over repressing Scott Adams’ comic… Continue reading

Comment: DeSantis can’t avoid taking side on Trump indictment

He risks alienating MAGA voters, but DeSantis has a slim window to step in front of GOP’s ‘beta wolves.’

Comment: This time, banking crisis won’t wreck the economy

The underlying causes of the Great Recession aren’t in place now. Expect the economy to muddle through.

Department of Natural Resources regional manager Allen McGuire, left, and acting bolder unit forester Tyson Whiteid, right, stand next to marker on land recently purchased by the DNR for timber harvest on Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2019 in Gold Bar, Wash. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Use state forestlands to ‘farm’ carbon credits

Legislation would allow the DNR to sell carbon offsets to fund reforestation and other climate work.

Getty Images, sundial
Editorial: Indifference risks loss of access to public records

Members of the state’s Sunshine Committee are questioning how much others value its work.

An addict prepares heroin, placing a fentanyl test strip into the mixing container to check for contamination, Wednesday Aug. 22, 2018, in New York. If the strip registers a "pinkish" to red marker then the heroin is positive for contaminants. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)
Editorial: Legalize fentanyl test strips, then distribute them

Legislation to remove their ‘paraphernalia’ label is likely to pass, but that’s just the first step.

Most Read