Don’t forget all promised before

Unlike the writer of the Wednesday letter, “Columnist didn’t do his homework,” I think James McCusker did all of his homework on Proposition 1. The writer just doesn’t like the results.

In an interview with King 5 news, Jon Scholes from the “pro” Proposition 1 side admitted that actual costs for this project will be at least $28 billion, and not the $18 billion first reported. If you don’t care about an extra $10 billion dollars here or there, I guess that should not concern you. Mr. Scholes also stated the number they came up with does not take into account any interest on the bonds after 2027. The actual estimated retirement of the bonds is 2057. The 30 extra years of paying financing on the bonds is where the “no” side of proposition 1 gets the $157 billion number. Saying the cost ends when the last bond is sold, and not when they are paid off is misleading.

With the yearly increase of materials and labor the $157 billion number may not be high enough. Mr. McCusker did his homework and found that the $18 billion number was in 2006 dollars, and what that means is the only way this project would have cost $18 billion is if all of the work would have been completed and paid for last year! Ultimately it does not matter how many billions of dollars this project will cost. What does matter is whether the same people who voted in $30 tabs will be willing to vote for increasing that cost to a minimum of $110 per year. This does not even include the sales tax increase. Maybe we have also forgotten the 13 cent tax increase on gasoline we approved to improve the roads last time. I thought our vote meant something.

Doug Harris

Monroe

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A parent walks their children to class at Whittier Elementary on Wednesday, Sept. 6, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Everett schools warrant yes votes on bond, levy

The bond will add and renovate schools; the levy supports 15% of the district’s budget.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Jan. 24

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Jan. 23

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Why LifeWise found it necessary to sue Everett Schools

Everett School District’s hostility to off-campus religious instruction violates the Constitution.

Comment: What families should consider in choosing a school

With a range of school options, here’s what to consider in finding a good fit for your child.

Comment: Latino, other communities rely on drug pricing program

Continued support of 340B is vital for diverse communities and small business owners in the state.

A drawing by Edie Everette made while providing care for her mother, who was living with dementia.
Forum: Care for loved one calls on compassion, grace and humor

When dementia arises in someone you love and now must care for, remember that you’re not alone.

The Buzz: Cpl. Veronika, you’re being sent to defend Greenland

Cows have been hiding their ability to use tools. Is the bovine revolution at hand?

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Jan. 22

A sketchy look at thenews of the day.… Continue reading

People sit on benches in the main hallway of Explorer Middle School’s new athletics building on Oct. 7, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Voters should approve Mukilteo schools levy, bond

The levy provides about 14% of the district’s budget. The bond funds improvements districtwide.

Schwab: It isn’t GOP cowardice but approval that emboldens Trump

In message and manner, an ICE-like cruelty is on proud display. And about last week’s column: “Pysch!”

Everett Schools levy, bond are investments that will pay off

My support for strong public schools is personal, professional and pragmatic. As… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.