Easy to check facts on payroll tax

Regarding the letter about the Democrats “monkeying” with Social Security, the Social Security website and basic research refutes most if not all of what the letter writer said. Here is what I fou

nd at www.ssa.gov/history/InternetMyths2.html.

The taxing of Social Security benefits began in 1984, following a series of amendments signed by then-President Reagan, with bipartisan support. Yes, in 1993 the percentage of the benefits that are taxable was raised by then-President Clinton from 50 percent to 85 percent. This doesn’t affect all those who collect them, however.

As far as putting the SS trust fund dollars into the general fund, the site says:

“There has never been any change in the way the Social Security program is financed or the way that Social Security payroll taxes are used by the federal government. The Social Security Trust Fund was created in 1939 as part of the Amendments enacted in that year. From its inception, the Trust Fund has always worked the same way. The Social Security Trust Fund has never been “put into the general fund of the government.” The confusion seems to stem from a change in how the budget is done, not a change to the fund itself.

Currently, no one who didn’t pay in to the fund (and doesn’t have a spouse or parent who did) can collect benefits, immigrant or not. And Social Security was never voluntary. It has always been a payroll tax. Not all jobs were covered by it, but if you had one that was, you participated. And there were never any promises that the rate would stay at 1 percent, nor that it would never be taxed. When the program started, that was the case. But it was not promised to stay like that.

So, it may not just be those senior citizens who are uniformed.

Lisa Hedman
Lynnwood

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence visit the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial in Washington, Jan. 21, 2019. (Sarah Silbiger/The New York Times)
Editorial: What would MLK Jr. do? What, now, will we do?

Monday marks the presidential inauguration and the King holiday, offering guidance on the way forward.

Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial is framed by autumnal colors at the Tidal Basin in Washington, D.C. (Getty Images)
Comment: Defining King’s ‘beloved community’

The term inspired MLK Jr.’s social justice work and persists for others to continue that work.

Paul: Decline in geriatric care a concern not just for seniors

As the population over 65 grows, we’re losing geriatricians to better-paying fields. Yet, there’s hope.

Comment: Trump’s health picks may pose greatest threat to U.S.

What mixed messages from RFK Jr. and others could affect parents’ attitudes about vaccination.

Eco-nomics: A brief history of how the climate crisis unfolded

A review of the facts and dates makes clear that ramping up fossil fuel use takes us in the wrong direction.

Comment: Everett Chamber a dedicated champion for business

A vital city needs the services and support of the return of the Greater Everett Chamber of Commerce.

Why put ‘cognitive hazard’ of fluoride in water?

I received this from Dr. Michael Greger July 15: “Based on new… Continue reading

Reject notion of ‘winnable’ nuclear war

During the 1960s, Pentagon war planners concluded that a successful and winning… Continue reading

?Are wildfires what God or his believes hath wrought?

Astronauts typically express awe and even love for the beautiful Earth below… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Jan. 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Forum: The one thing that AI can’t replicate: our wondrous flaws

Anything that AI produces, such as music, is hollow in its perfection. Flaws breathe life into our work.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.