A full-scale mock-up of a high-speed bullet train is displayed at the California Capitol in Sacramento, in February 2015. The California High-Speed Rail Authority’s biennial business plan, released Tuesday, Feb. 8, 2022, shows the estimated cost of the project rising by about $5 billion, compared to the 2020 plan, up to as much as $105 billion. (Rich Pedroncelli / Associated Press)

A full-scale mock-up of a high-speed bullet train is displayed at the California Capitol in Sacramento, in February 2015. The California High-Speed Rail Authority’s biennial business plan, released Tuesday, Feb. 8, 2022, shows the estimated cost of the project rising by about $5 billion, compared to the 2020 plan, up to as much as $105 billion. (Rich Pedroncelli / Associated Press)

Editorial: Bullet train study should include other options

The state’s $150 million, joined by federal funds, will look at a bullet train between Portland and B.C.

By The Herald Editorial Board

There’s light rail; there’s high-speed rail and there’s ultra-high-speed rail. Then there’s the “third rail,” the electrified line that provides a metaphor for controversial topics you’d best not touch.

A relatively modest $150 million investment in the $16.8 billion state transportation budget — Move Ahead Washington — that Gov. Jay Inslee signed last week raises issues that may end up touching all four rails.

That $150 million was set aside as seed money to attract possible federal matching funds — between $600 million and $700 million — for advanced planning for a dedicated 300-plus-mile ultra-high-speed rail line serving Portland, Ore., Seattle and Vancouver, B.C., with other stops likely, including Everett.

As planned, the line — separate from the existing rail line used for Amtrak, Sounder and Burlington Northern Santa Fe’s freight service — would run 260-passenger electric “bullet” trains, reaching speeds of 220 mph, up to 30 times a day and serving 2.1 million riders annually when service starts in 2035, and 3.3 million passengers by 2055.

Passengers between Portland and Seattle would make the trip in about an hour, as would those between Seattle and Vancouver, B.C. Current passenger rail travel times are three-and-a-half hours between Seattle and Portland and between Seattle and Vancouver, when service to Canada resumes in June.

That $150 million investment, and others in aviation electrification, low-carbon aviation fuels and more, said state Sen. Marko Liias, D-Everett, chairman of the Senate’s transportation committee, in an interview last week, represent a “1 percent investment in the future of transportation that will provide solutions as the region grows.”

If federal funding is secured, a total of up to $850 million would be spent for design work, route planning, engineering, environmental reviews and community outreach in coming years to develop, Liias said, “a fully baked proposal we can all consider.”

There’s already concern, however, that the state and federal funds could allow enough momentum to gather behind the proposal to prevent stopping the train before arrival at Boondoggle Station; and perhaps will divert investments needed elsewhere by a similar upgrade of the existing rail line and efforts to keep Sound Transit’s regional Link Light Rail system connecting Everett, Seattle, Bellevue and Tacoma on its already delayed schedule.

An earlier study has set the cost for the cross-state bullet train project — dubbed Cascadia — at between $24 billion and $42 billion to complete, depending on final land acquisition costs, eminent domain legal fights and how much tunneling would be involved.

A similar bullet train line under construction in California, to serve the 500 miles between San Francisco and Los Angeles, started out 14 years ago with voter approval of a $10 billion bond request that has since grown to $105 billion in estimated costs, with service promised by 2029. A recent New York Times story found divergent views on the California project’s hopes for future federal funding and even its completion.

For far less than half the expected cost for Cascadia’s bullet train, two rail experts — Thomas White, a rail industry consultant, and Bill Moyer, a rail advocate — wrote last year that the existing rail line between Vancouver, B.C., and Portland could be upgraded and electrified and would allow high-speed Amtrak service — at up to 110 mph — that would still cut the time between Seattle and Portland and Seattle and Vancouver to two-and-a-half hours and would also serve the same number of passengers.

For an estimated $9.2 billion, White and Moyer wrote, the rail corridor can be upgraded not only for passenger service but freight needs as well, speeding passenger and freight, and would serve up to 14 communities on the corridor.

“Rail is already at least three times more efficient than truck transportation, so taking freight from highways to rail is vital for reducing carbon pollution,” the pair wrote. “Since trucks cause by far the most damage to highways, moving to rail also saves road maintenance dollars, not to mention improving air and water quality.”

An investment by BNSF in battery electric locomotives, which the rail line already are testing, would amplify those climate benefits.

Best of all, the state already has a study and planning — started in 1991 and updated as recently as 2006 — that shows the potential and considerations for upgrading the Amtrak Cascades line, making the project “shovel-ready” and primed for federal funding.

Liias, interviewed this week for a Northwest News Network public radio story, said federal funding for the Cascadia project and Amtrak Cascades aren’t mutually exclusive and can be pursued in tandem.

At the same time, Sound Transit’s Link system hasn’t been an afterthought in the state’s transportation budget. While the transportation budget provided no new direct state funding, Liias said, lawmakers and Sound Transit have had discussions about keeping light rail expansion on schedule and perhaps even advancing the timeline.

Among recent changes, the Legislature has provided for Sound Transit to use state right of way at discounted rates.

“The reality is that no one else is going to be using our highway right of way other than the state Department of Transportation. It doesn’t make sense to try and charge them rent when they’re providing a public service there,” Liias said.

And Sound Transit’s access to state grant programs, suspended with passage of the last major transportation package, is being restored, he said.

And Liias said he has had talks with County Executive and Sound Transit board member Dave Somers about potential funding sources for light rail stations, such as a planned but as yet unfunded station at Airport Road and Highway 99 that might be built through a public-private partnership.

Combined with future federal grants backed by the region’s congressional delegation, “all of that combined will lead to (Sound Transit) staying on track. And hopefully we can pull them a little earlier over time,” Liias said.

The state’s $150 million for study of the Cascadia bullet train is contingent on it winning the federal matching funds. At nearly $1 billion, with state and federal money combined, that investment is not an insignificant amount of taxpayer funds, but the potential for a better look at the “transportation of the future” deserves consideration.

But that consideration should come with a detailed reexamination of the Amtrak Cascades upgrade and renewed commitment to speedy completion for the Link Light Rail system.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, July 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Junelle Lewis, right, daughter Tamara Grigsby and son Jayden Hill sing “Lift Every Voice and Sing” during Monroe’s Juneteenth celebration on Saturday, June 18, 2022. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Happy Independence Days, America

Linked by history and promise, Juneteenth and the Fourth of July should be celebrated together.

Comment: America’s 250th offers opportunity to look forward

The bicentennial in 1976 focused on America’s history. We can use the ‘semiquin’ in 2026 to look ahead.

Downtown Everett perfect location for Sorticulture

I was at Sorticulture this year and what a great turnout (“Sorticulture,… Continue reading

Saunders: U.S. policy luring people to risky border crossing

Providing amnesty to those who have previously crossed illegally will only lead to more deaths.

No way to treat Lady Justice

Dear Lady Justice, your blindfold seems to be slipping down. Sir, my… Continue reading

FILE - In this Oct. 19, 2016 file photo, a man fishes for salmon in the Snake River above the Lower Granite Dam in Washington state. Three Republican U.S. House members from Washington state are criticizing Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., for opposing their legislation that would prevent the breaching of four dams on the Snake River to help improve endangered salmon runs. (Jesse Tinsley /The Spokesman-Review via AP, File)
Editorial: Waiting could force bad choice on dams, salmon

Work should begin now to begin replacing what four dams on the Snake River provide.

Joe Kennedy, a former assistant football coach at Bremerton High School in Bremerton, Wash., poses for a photo March 9, 2022, at the school's football field. After losing his coaching job for refusing to stop kneeling in prayer with players and spectators on the field immediately after football games, Kennedy will take his arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, April 25, 2022, saying the Bremerton School District violated his First Amendment rights by refusing to let him continue praying at midfield after games. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Editorial: Court majority weakens church, state separation

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision does more to hurt religious liberty than protect a coach’s prayer.

A pregnant protester is pictured with a message on her shirt in support of abortion rights during a march, Friday, June 24, 2022, in Seattle. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to end constitutional protections for abortion has cleared the way for states to impose bans and restrictions on abortion — and will set off a series of legal battles. (AP Photo/Stephen Brashear)
Editorial: Court’s decision a subtraction from our rights

Using a cherry-picked history, it limits the rights of women and will extend the reach of poverty.

Most Read