Democrat Manka Dhingra, running for state senator for the 45th Legislative District, greets supporters in Woodinville on Tuesday. (Mike Siegel/The Seattle Times via AP)

Democrat Manka Dhingra, running for state senator for the 45th Legislative District, greets supporters in Woodinville on Tuesday. (Mike Siegel/The Seattle Times via AP)

Editorial: Democrats’ control in Olympia comes with a duty

The Democrats’ majorities in the Legislature could be short-lived if they don’t work with Republicans.

By The Herald Editorial Board

President Trump may have gotten a wall after all. But this one’s blue and runs the length of the West Coast from Canada to Mexico.

The apparent victory of Democrat Manka Dhingra over Republican Jinyoung Englund for the Legislature’s 45th District in King County, means Democrats will have slim majorities in both the Senate and House as well as holding the governor’s office, joining Oregon and California as states with Democrats in sole control of legislative and executive branches.

Tina Podlodowski, chairwoman of the state Democratic Party, told a crowd of Dhingra supporters at an election night party in Woodinville that her win represented the last brick in that wall.

“The big blue wall means California, Oregon, all of us together can pass statewide policies that are against the Trump agenda,” she told KUOW (94.9 FM).

Democrats may relish the win as a rebuke of President Trump and his policies, but their control of the Legislature could be short-lived if their focus isn’t kept on this Washington and the desire of the public to see completion of work — reached through bipartisanship — on a list of issues in the state.

Democrats will have limited time to prove themselves deserving of one-party control before next year’s elections, where all House seats and most Senate seats — including Dhingra’s — will again be before the voters, as noted Wednesday by The Herald’s Jerry Cornfield.

Republicans have controlled the Senate for the last five years, while Democrats have maintained a majority in the House.

That shared control of the bicameral Legislature has prevented either party from running up the score with its own agenda and has forced some compromises and even notable successes, including this year’s passage of a paid family-leave act, one of the first of its kind in the nation.

But that divided government also has been responsible for extended sessions in recent years, including this year’s record three-overtime 193-day scrum. Even with that extra time, while lawmakers produced a long-awaited funding scheme for K-12 education, the solution falls short of success in the opinion of many school districts and, potentially, the state Supreme Court.

The Legislature, again because of that divided government, also failed to adopt a $4 billion capital budget, the spending plan that outlines public construction projects that are important to every community in the state, and this year also would have funded $1 billion in desperately needed school construction. The capital budget usually is as close to a sure bet as state government can wager, but this year, Senate Republicans held up approval unless House Democrats agreed to a “fix” of the Hirst decision, a Supreme Court case regarding water rights.

The stalemate left state construction projects on hold, wasting a summer’s worth of construction — and provided a near guarantee of higher construction costs once the budget is approved — and offered no relief for property owners who are facing a virtual stop-work order on home construction in rural areas without the ability to drill wells to serve homes.

With Democrats now in control of House and Senate the logical choice for the first two items on the to-do list should be the capital budget and the Hirst issue, and it’s the Democrats’ first opportunity to demonstrate some fairness and show they can work collaboratively with Republicans, even when they have the majority.

Passing the capital budget should be the first order of business either in a special session this year or early next year in what’s supposed to be a short 60-day session.

With that done, Democrats in House and Senate need to work earnestly to find a resolution on Hirst. Prior to the end of the session earlier this year, Democrats and Gov. Jay Inslee both suggested a temporary measure that would set the clock back on the Supreme Court’s Hirst decision and allow property owners to proceed with wells, while work advanced on permanent legislation. Republicans objected to the temporary measure, believing it wouldn’t resolve the issue in a timely matter.

But that objection no longer carries water. Republicans, at least for the coming legislative session, have lost their leverage on the issue, and they — as much as Democrats — need to work earnestly toward a workable compromise on Hirst.

On school funding, the state Supreme Court is expected to issue its opinion soon on whether the Legislature met its 2018 deadline to resolve the K-12 education crisis. With direction from the court, Democrats may consider adjusting the revenue formula, which now includes a significant shift of property taxes to the state and away from local school districts. Many school districts, among them Everett, say the funding formula disadvantages them.

In previous sessions, Democrats and Gov. Inslee have proposed a capital gains tax as part of the funding solution. While some, particularly Republicans, will view such a proposal as over-reach, it could better balance the property tax burden for state residents.

Democrats also are likely to bring forward other legislation that has been blocked in the Senate, including gun control measures, such as safe-storage legislation proposed repeatedly by Rep. Ruth Kagi, D-Shoreline; environmental protections for Puget Sound and the Salish Sea; requirements that employers’ health insurance plans cover birth control; campaign finance reform; and Gov. Inslee’s push for a carbon tax.

But none of it should — and in the case of bonds for the capital budget, can — be accomplished without buy-in from some Republicans.

Dhingra acknowledged in a story last week in The New York Times that to maintain control for more than the next year, Democrats will have to avoid mirroring California’s legislative monopoly and instead prove themselves responsible.

Democrats should follow their newest colleague’s lead.

Voters have shown they’re comfortable with change and just as comfortable with changing things back.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Feb. 22

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial: Avoid damaging trade war over Boeing tax break

At the jetmaker’s request, state lawmakers are considering suspension of a lucrative tax incentive.

Schwab: How ‘justice’ is defined at the law firm of Trump & Barr

When Barr complains Trumps’ tweets make it hard to do his job, he means the job of serving him, and only him.

President Trump must be removed from office

Donald Trump is without grace and without honor. He’s irrational, illogical, immovable,… Continue reading

Herald more balanced than I thought?

There have been many times that I nearly cancelled my subscription to… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Feb. 21

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial: Your presidential primary ballots are in the mail

But if you’re voting for a Democrat, you might want to wait before marking your choice.

Editorial: Insurance fee could limit wildfire risk, damage

A modest tax would fund $63 million each year for forest health and fighting wildfires in the state.

Editorial: Our county’s dubious distinction on school funding

The failure rate for levies and bonds in the county is in contrast to 90 percent approval statewide.

Most Read