Tim Eyman, shown her during a 2016 court hearing regarding the legality of an anti-tax measure, in King County Superior Court in Seattle, is mounting a court challenge against an attempt by the Legislature to amend and adopt an initiative that bypasses voters. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

Tim Eyman, shown her during a 2016 court hearing regarding the legality of an anti-tax measure, in King County Superior Court in Seattle, is mounting a court challenge against an attempt by the Legislature to amend and adopt an initiative that bypasses voters. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

Editorial: Eyman right to fight lawmakers’ initiative maneuver

The initiative promoter is suing to let voters choose between I-940 and the Legislature’s version.

By The Herald Editorial Board

Make note of the date, because we’re going to agree with Tim Eyman on something.

Stopped clocks, blind pigs and acorns — and all that — but the Mukilteo initiative promoter is correct that the Legislature acted unconstitutionally when it amended an initiative that sought to reform the deadly force standard for police shootings.

The issue stems from the Legislature’s handling of Initiative 940, which sought to change state law that had required prosecutors prove a police officer acted with malice to find guilt in an officer-involved shooting.

With days remaining before the end of the session earlier this month, the Legislature passed House Bill 3003, drafted as part of a compromise among proponents of the initiative, De-Escalate Washington, and some — although not all — law enforcement groups, including the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs and the Fraternal Order of Police.

HB 3003 eliminates the malice standard and asks prosecutors to review whether a reasonable officer in the same situation would have believed deadly force was necessary to prevent injury or death to police or others. The bill also includes provisions for training, independent investigations of police shootings and requires the state to reimburse officers for reasonable defense costs if an officer is found not guilty or charges are dismissed.

As adopted and signed by the governor, HB 3003, is arguably better legislation than was provided in I-940, but that’s not the issue.

Eyman, who filed suit against Secretary of State Kim Wyman on Monday in Thurston County Superior Court, doesn’t mention any objection or support for I-940 or HB 3003; he addresses only the manner in which the compromise was adopted. Eyman wants Wyman to place both I-940 and HB 3003 on the ballot and let voters choose.

The court should direct Wyman to do so. This is simple: Voters should be trusted, as the Constitution provides, to make the choice between the initiative and the lawmakers’ alternative.

In reviewing initiatives to the Legislature, lawmakers are constrained by the state Constitution to three courses of action: They can approve the initiative as written; reject it or do nothing, in which case the initiative appears on the ballot; or they can propose an alternative and place it and the initiative on the same ballot and allow voters to choose which will become law, if either.

A legal opinion from the state attorney general’s office in 1971 makes clear that any changes to an initiative from the people must appear alongside the original initiative on the ballot. Even simple corrections to initiatives can’t escape that requirement, an Associated Press report noted.

Lawmakers, however, invented a fourth option that amended and adopted the original initiative and basically bypasses the voters. In an attempt to get around the Constitution, the legislation takes effect only if no referendum is filed by June to challenge it.

But that requires supporters of the original initiative to go back out and gather signatures a second time, creating a new hoop for initiative backers to jump through. That’s not likely here, since De-Escalate Washington was part of the compromise, but the concern is for the precedent that this could set.

Eyman is correct — yes, we said it again — that lawmakers could now use the same tactic against any future initiative that it reviews; lawmakers can simply amend or rewrite initiatives to any degree they see fit, adopt them and force supporters back out to gather more signatures if they disagree with the changes.

And lawmakers seem to know there’s a problem here that threatens the viability of initiatives, a democratic process that has been treasured by Washington voters for more than 100 years.

“I have incredibly grave concerns that we are creating a convoluted process for getting around a constitutional right,” Sen. Joe Fain, R-Auburn, told the Associated Press, before passage.

Sen. Maralyn Chase, D-Edmonds, was more blunt in admitting the unconstitutionality of the move, even as she gave it her approval.

“This is a worthy endeavor,” Chase told the AP. “I think it takes precedence over what the Constitution says about initiatives.”

No, senator; worthy endeavors do not take precedence over what the Constitution says about initiatives.

Eyman has made a living out of initiatives, and he’s had his own tangles with the state Constitution. Of the 20 or so he’s put on the ballot, 10 were passed by voters, but six of those were found unconstitutional. His court challenge here, of course, is about protecting that livelihood.

But when he’s right, he’s right.

Correction: An earlier version of this editorial misspelled Sen. Maralyn Chase’s first name.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, July 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Scott Spahr, Generation Engineering Manager at Snohomish County PUD, points to a dial indicating 4 megawatts of power production from one of two Francis turbine units at the Henry M. Jackson Powerhouse on Friday, Feb. 17, 2023, near Sultan, Washington. Some of the water that passes through units 3 and 4 — the two Francis turbines — is diverted to Lake Chaplain, which supplies water to Everett. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Amber King best suited for PUD’s 2nd District seat

Among three solid candidates, King’s knowledge of utilities and contracts will serve ratepayers well.

From the Publisher: The Herald’s team is committed to readers

I’m returning as publisher to aid The Herald during its transition and continue its 123-year legacy.

Comment: We need to think hard on political discourse

The attempt on Donald Trump’s life should bring reflection on how we respond to others’ beliefs.

Comment: Vote yes to bring power of Everett port across county

A countywide port district would offer the tools and funding to foster economic development and jobs.

Forum: Port of Everett’s Prop 1 adds bureaucracy and new tax

Its yes campaign claims jobs and projects, but its tax and authority will diminish local control.

Comment: Court’s rulings a win for citizens over regulators

The rulings regarding ‘Chevron deference’ and the SEC keep the three branches in their lanes.

Editorial cartoons for Friday, July 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Vote 2024. US American presidential election 2024. Vote inscription, badge, sticker. Presidential election banner Vote 2024, poster, sign. Political election campaign symbol. Vector Illustration
Editorial: Return Wagoner and Low to 39th Disrict seats

‘Workhorse’ Republicans, both have sponsored successful solution-oriented legislation in each chamber.

Schwab: Attempt on Trump’s life doesn’t require giving up

Those opposed to a second Trump term still are allowed to speak their minds and cast their votes.

Vote for more of Port of Everett’s projects by voting for Prop. 1

Letters and editorials are flying, both pro and con, on Proposition 1:… Continue reading

We need answers to questions about Alderwood mall shooting

I was deeply saddened reading the article about the memorial service for… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.