Editorial: No sympathy for stealing, politicizing music

  • By The Herald Editorial Board
  • Monday, July 25, 2016 1:30am
  • Opinion

By The Herald Editorial Board

To paraphrase the late Rodney Dangerfield, musicians don’t get no respect! Historically ripped off by music companies and managers, and now the internet, singers and groups remain mired in a decades-long, losing battle to keep politicians and political campaigns from using their music without permission.

(Most recently, the O’Jays, Earth Wind & Fire, Queen, George Harrison’s estate, the Rolling Stones, Adele, Twisted Sister, Neil Young and others were upset with the Trump campaign and/or the Republican National Convention for using music without permission.)

If politicians and campaigns were ethical, and industrious (find another song whose writer would be thrilled with its use) this would not be a problem. They would be embarrassed when famous singers and songwriters speak out against them. But this is politics, and so the issue is seen through a fine-line legal lens instead.

Some singers have sued and won, The Los Angeles Times reported, and some have sued and lost, resulting in no established legal precedent. The issue, The Times explains, “pits two constitutionally protected rights against each other: the 1st Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech, and Article 1, Section 8 provisions in the Constitution protecting intellectual property rights under U.S. Copyright law.”

Since an average citizen would be required to follow copyright law in order to use a song, it seems reasonable to subject politicians and campaigns to the same law. Which means that music will continue to be used without permission, in steamroller fashion. It’s another David and Goliath situation, as most musicians don’t have the fortunes needed for a legal fight. Singers and groups might have more success by banding together, for a kind of class-action suit.

Just as much as the illegal use of their material, musicians are saddened and maddened by the use of songs whose meaning is lost when used politically. The two founding members of the O’Jays objected to the use of their 1973 song “Love Train” at the GOP convention, and which was changed on one of its social media sites to “Trump Train,” The Los Angeles Times reported.

“Our music, and most especially, ‘Love Train’ is about bringing people together, not building walls,” said Walter Williams.

It would be helpful for anyone wanting to use a song for any purpose to really study the lyrics first. For some reason, the Trump campaign (without permission), and a PetSmart commercial tying-in with the movie, “The Secret Life of Pets” (with permission) both use the Rolling Stones song, “Sympathy for the Devil.”

It’s wildly inappropriate and unfair to associate it with pets. If Trump finds it appropriate, fine, but it does seem like the last song in the world one would want to use without permission. What if the Rolling Stones made an ironclad deal with the devil?

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, April 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Schwab: Is there a hole for us to get sick in?

How can conservatives justify the flouting of due process in sending away any without conviction or charge?

Trump logging policy isn’t solution to wildfires

Wildfire is a serious threat in our state, impacting our communities and… Continue reading

U.S., Canada should process own natural resources

Ever since the U.S., under both Democrat and Republican party administrations, began… Continue reading

If trade deficit with China is a problem it’s fault of U.S.

President Trump is of the view that China and other a Asian… Continue reading

Tufekci: Why RFK Jr. has relaunched his fluoride crusade

Cowed to voice the mildest of approvals for the MMR vaccine, he maneuvers to reassure his base.

An apartment building under construction in Olympia, Washington in January 2025. Critics of a proposal to cap rent increases in Washington argue that it could stifle new development. (Photo by Bill Lucia/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Lawmakers should seek deal to keep rent cap at 7%

Now that rent stabilization has passed both chambers, a deal on a reasonable cap must be struck.

The sun sets beyond the the Evergreen Branch of the Everett Public Library as a person returns some books on Friday, Nov. 11, 2022, in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Reverse ruinous cuts to federal library program

The Trump administration’s shuttering of the IMLS will be felt at the local and state levels.

Kids play on glacial erratic in the Martha Lake Airport Park on Friday, May 4, 2018 in Lynnwood, Wa. The Glacial erratic rock in the park is one of the largest in urban King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties. (Andy Bronson / The Herald)
Editorial: Little park at Martha Lake an example of success

For 35 years, a state program has secured vital funding for parks, habitat, forests and farmland.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, April 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Social Security shield we need from volatile markets

After what we’ve seen this month from markets, we should guard the stability Old Age Insurance offers.

Don’t cut vital spending on health from state budget

The residents of Washington did not create the state’s current budget issues,… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.