Editorial: Puget Sound needs a regional transportation authority

By The Herald Editorial Board

After having done the heavy lifting to put together a plan to extend Sound Transit’s Link light rail system in Snohomish, King and Pierce counties — which voters approved this month — the members of Sound Transit’s board of directors are likely to face a legislative challenge that would oust them in favor of a board of directly elected representatives.

That’s gratitude for ya.

But it’s a proposal worth discussion as the Puget Sound’s most populous counties work to build not only the ST3 light rail extension, but also continue to study, plan, fund and implement the entire region’s transportation needs during the next 25 to 30 years.

Sen. Steve O’Ban, R-University Place, and Rep. Mark Harmsworth, R-Mill Creek, said they will reintroduce legislation in the 2017 session that would replace the current board with a 19-member board of locally elected representatives, each from a separate district in Sound Transit’s taxing district, which includes portions of Snohomish, King and Pierce counties.

“Making this board accountable to the people directly is consistent with a long cherished tradition of democracy” to provide representation regarding taxation, O’Ban told The Herald’s Jerry Cornfield last week.

The current Sound Transit board’s members are elected officials, though not elected specifically to that role. The board includes each of the three county executives, who then appoint the rest of the 17-member board from local cities’ elected officials. Snohomish County’s representatives are County Executive Dave Somers, Everett City Councilmember Paul Roberts and Edmonds Mayor Dave Earling.

That model was effective as Sound Transit planned and started construction of the light rail system, guided by a board of directors who were each already informed about their community’s transportation and other needs.

O’Ban, Harmsworth and others now make the case that following passage of the funding package for ST3, the voters who approved increases to their vehicle tabs, sales tax and property tax will need representation that they elect directly. The stakes, admittedly, are high; voters approved $54 billion in spending over the next 25 years.

Critics of the legislation defend the current system as best able to provide regional planning and leadership.

“Balkanizing the system is not an answer to building a regional system,” Roberts told The Herald.

We do wonder if the needs of Snohomish County, which would still only have three members compared to King County’s 12, would have a strong enough voice under the proposed system. Had O’Ban’s and Harmsworth’s legislation passed earlier, a block of King County districts might have favored their own projects over the proposal to extend light rail to the manufacturing jobs center at Paine Field.

We’re not convinced that a representative elected to a particular district would be as committed to the region’s needs as he or she would be to the voters of that singular district.

And the legislation does nothing to streamline a complex and intertwined system of transportation agencies in the region that, while usually cooperative, complicates planning to avoid duplicating services and sometimes finds agencies competing for the same resources. A better solution would be a truly regional transportation system, led by a combination of directly elected representatives and other officials with background expertise in relevant areas.

Ten years ago, at the Legislature’s request, a nine-member panel — two of whose members were Snohomish County’s Reid Shockey and Gigi Burke — studied the Puget Sound’s regional transportation system. The panel, the Regional Transportation Committee, produced a report that recommended “reknitting” an infrastructure that included a patchwork quilt of 128 separate agencies that managed aspects of transportation in Snohomish, King, Pierce and Kitsap counties into a regional system led by a 15-member board.

Leaders and lawmakers should take the report down from the shelf, dust it off and read it.

The Puget Sound Regional Transportation Commission board was to be led by nine nonpartisan commissioners, elected from proportional districts. The six other board members were to be appointed by the governor based on expertise in specific subject areas, such as planning, construction, finance and management.

Under the proposal, the four-county region would keep as a block grant the tax revenue it generates within its borders from the gas tax, vehicle tabs and other sources and use it for regional transportation needs. It would also have the ability to levy its own taxes and set regional tolls.

Taking such a large chunk of resources and authority from the state and combining so many agencies will raise concerns for many. But we face bigger problems. Between now and 2040, the Puget Sound region is expected to add 1 million new residents. The 4.9 million residents of the region in 2040 will require not only representation but a governing body on transportation issues that is organized, focused and responsive.

Picking new members for the Sound Transit board addresses only one patch in the quilt.

Correction: An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly identified the party affiliation of Rep. Mark Harmsworth of Mill Creek. He is a Republican.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, May 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Zoe Charlebois, 10, left, and Makayla Goshen, 10, laugh as they make their friendship first aid kits during the InspireHER event at Snohomish Boys & Girls Club on Friday, Nov. 2, 2018 in Snohomish, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: For 75 years a safe place to hang out and more

The Boys Girls Clubs of Snohomish County have served the needs of kids and families for 75 years.

FILE - In this July 31, 2013, file photo, tourists visiting the Mendenhall Glacier in the Tongass National Forest are reflected in a pool of water as they make their way to Nugget Falls in Juneau, Alaska. The U.S. Forest Service announced plans Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2020, to lift restrictions on road building and logging in Tongass National Forest, a largely pristine rainforest in southeast Alaska that provides habitat for wolves, bears and salmon. Conservation groups vowed to fight the decision. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast, File)
Viewpoints: Nature priceless, but it should have a price

Would we be more likely to protect the natural world if we understood its value economically?

Comment: Medicare for All could have saved lives during covid

By assuring life-saving medications and care, a single-payer system would save 69,000 lives a year.

Comment: Covid is refuting the case for Medicare for All

Medicare didn’t improve outcomes for seniors during the pandemic; it won’t for the rest of us.

Support for 988 suicide hotline needed in state

May is Mental Health Month. By urging my public officials to prioritize… Continue reading

Island County not responsible for wreck on Camano Island

A recent lawsuit settlement will be struck down by the state Supreme… Continue reading

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, May 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

In this Wednesday, March 24, 2021 image from video provided by Duke Health, Alejandra Gerardo, 9, looks up to her mom, Dr. Susanna Naggie, as she gets the first of two Pfizer COVID-19 vaccinations during a clinical trial for children at Duke Health in Durham, N.C. In the U.S. and abroad, researchers are beginning to test younger and younger kids, to make sure the shots are safe and work for each age. (Shawn Rocco/Duke Health via AP)
Editorial: Parents have decision to make on vaccinating kids

With one vaccine now approved for kids 12 and older, parents shouldn’t wait for a school requirement.

Most Read