Editorial: Reforms needed to state’s presidential primary, other elections

By The Herald Editorial Board

Yes, we’re only months removed from the presidential election and nearly four years away from the next — although some might already be daydreaming of 2020 — but it’s still a good time to consider reforms to our state election laws.

The state’s chief election officer, Secretary of State Kim Wyman, a Republican who won election to her second term in November, has proposed a raft of reforms for the Legislature to consider this session.

For a third straight year, Wyman is seeking legislation that would move up the date of the state’s presidential primary so that state voters have a greater opportunity to help determine the parties’ nominees. Senate Bill 5333 and its House version HB 1469 would move the presidential primary to the second Tuesday in March, several weeks earlier than its current date on the fourth Tuesday in May.

Had that change been in place last year, Republican voters would have had three more options for the May 9 primary. As it was, Donald Trump was the last Republican candidate standing as of the primary. John Kasich and Ted Cruz withdrew just days before the primary and Marco Rubio quit in mid-March.

The bill would allow for some flexibility on the March date so that Washington could potentially schedule a regional primary with other western states.

In previous attempts Wyman has attempted to get the Democratic and Republican parties to agree to tie at least some of their allocation of convention delegates to the results of the primary to make it more than a beauty contest. She was partially successful last year, with the Republicans using the primary to allocate delegates, but the Democrats balked, preferring to use the precinct caucuses for that purpose.

Wyman’s dropping that provision, but wants to see other changes to the presidential primary, most notably one that would restore the voice of voters who don’t care to publicly affiliate themselves with one party of the other. Wyman has proposed adding an unaffiliated ballot that would allow voters to chose any candidate but would not affiliate them with a party and would tabulate those votes separately from the votes of those identifying with a party.

Wyman, during a recent meeting with The Herald Editorial Board, said she heard from many voters who chose not to participate in the primary because they didn’t want to be affiliated with or have their name shared with either party. Voter’s choices for president aren’t made public, of course, but the party declarations are a public record.

Another reform Wyman is seeking would apply to all elections, allowing 17-year-olds to register as future voters, submitting their information online, by mail or in person, which would be kept in a “pending” file but would become active on their 18th birthday.

Another would set a standard deadline for voter registration of 11 days before an election, cleaning up the difference that allows online and mail registration up to 29 days before an election but eight days before for in-person registration.

And with more voters using ballot drop boxes during elections, Wyman wants vandalism and tampering of drop boxes to be charged as malicious mischief, a class B felony. Wyman said she knew of no reports of vandalism or other problems with drop boxes, but wants to see additional protection for ballots.

The reforms sought, particularly in moving up the date of the presidential primary and creating an unaffiliated ballot, seek to encourage greater voter interest and participation. Wyman’s proposal for an unaffiliated ballot is likely to be met with opposition from stalwarts in each party, but it would restore an option that state voters haven’t seen since the end of the blanket primary, favored by many voters who enjoyed the independence and the ability to keep their party preferences to themselves.

Those issues won’t return until the 2020 presidential campaign is upon us, but there’s no reason to delay the reforms.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

October 20, 2020: Scaring the voters
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Oct. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Paul J. Lawrence, attorney for the Legislature, addresses justices during a hearing before the Washington Supreme Court Tuesday, June 11, 2019, in Olympia, Wash. The court heard oral arguments in the case that will determine whether state lawmakers are subject to the same disclosure rules that apply to other elected officials under the voter-approved Public Records Act. The hearing before the high court was an appeal of a case that was sparked by a September 2017 lawsuit filed by a media coalition, led by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: Montoya-Lewis, Whitener for state Supreme Court

Both justices’ legal experience is further informed by their perspectives as women and minorities.

Court bench gavel justice
Editorial: Grant best choice for county Superior Court seat

Robert Grant and Cassandra Lopez Shaw are well qualified but Grant has served as a pro tem judge.

Courtney Normand, director of the Planned Parenthood-affiliated political group Safe & Healthy Youth Washington that is supporting a sex education requirement for public schools, poses for a photo Thursday, Sept. 24, 2020, in Arlington, Wash. Democrats in the famously liberal state say they want to protect young people from sexual abuse, diseases and infections. But the increasingly outnumbered and aggrieved Republicans have taken issue with the content of the standards as they rally for local control. The resulting referendum on the November ballot marks the first time in the country that such a decision on sex ed will be decided by voters. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: Yes on Ref. 90 serves parents’ choice, kids’ health

It assures — at parents’ option — all K-12 students can get age-appropriate sexual health education.

Housing Hope Sequoia project
Editorial: Project will aid education of homeless students

Housing Hope’s proposal to serve families of homeless students respects the concerns of neighbors.

Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, center, speaks as King County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg, left, and Thurston County Prosecuting Attorney Jon Tunheim look on during a news conference about Ferguson's lawsuit challenging a Trump Administration practice of ICE arrests at courthouses Tuesday, Dec. 17, 2019, in Seattle. Washington state has sued the Trump administration over its practice of arresting people at courthouses for immigration violations, saying it interferes with the state's authority to run its own judicial system. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: Ferguson clear choice to lead state’s ‘law firm’

The AG has a proven record on issues of criminal justice, Trump’s over-reach and consumer protection.

Election vote icon for general use.
Editorial: Stanford, Duerr, Kloba for 1st Legislative District

The three Democrats have shown their ability to move useful legislation through both chambers.

Jay Inslee (left) and Loren Culp
Editorial: Tested by pandemic, Inslee deserves third term

The governor’s leadership and trust in science has saved lives and ultimately the state economy.

The candidates for Washington State Treasurer are incumbent Duane Davidson, a Republican; and state Rep. Mike Pellicciotti, D-Federal Way.
Editorial: Pellicciotti best choice for state’s treasurer

Current Treasurer Duane Davidson has many accomplishments but a poor committee attendance record.

Most Read