Health reform and immigration: the truth

In their tireless efforts to kill health care reform, right-wingers have fanned fears that it would attract illegal aliens. This sideshow is rather twisted because, actually, the reforms would do the opposite. They would help curb illegal immigration.

Start with Canada to see how this works. Canadians have universal coverage, a big immigration program and almost no undocumented workers. These things are not unrelated. Government-guaranteed medical care is a big reason why Canada doesn’t tolerate illegal immigration. No country can long afford a large subclass of poor workers that pays little in taxes and collects full benefits.

To quote conservative economist Milton Friedman, “It’s just obvious that you can’t have free immigration and a welfare state.”

Here in the United States, the House health-reform bill has an entire section titled, “No Federal Payment for Undocumented Aliens.” Furthermore, it requires every worker to have coverage, while denying subsidies to illegal immigrants, whatever their income. In other words, illegal immigrants would have to obtain health insurance and pay full freight for it. That doesn’t sound like a five-course free lunch to me.

Aha, say Republican foes of the legislation. The illegals will get around it. “Without the verification, you can’t frankly believe it is serious,” says Rep. Lamar Smith, Republican of Texas. Fair point. Let’s address it.

As a practical matter, undocumented workers shy away from government programs that could expose their illegal status. A law passed in 2005 requires applicants to Medicaid, which insures poor people, to prove their citizenship. Two years later, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform studied Medicaid enrollments in five states (Kansas, Colorado, Minnesota, Washington and Wisconsin). It found only eight illegal immigrants on the rolls.

But, says Georgia Republican Rep. Phil Gingrey, “a lot of their kids are in the school system.” That’s true. The schools don’t check for immigration status. Medicaid does. And so would the health care system now envisioned by Congress.

It’s worth noting that President Obama’s is the first administration to seriously crack down on illegal immigration in decades. Under its orders, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency has stepped up audits of companies suspected of using illegal labor. Hundreds of offenders have been slapped with stiff fines and warnings to mend their ways.

The administration has just started requiring any company seeking sizeable federal contracts to use the E-Verify system, a database containing Social Security and other records, to ensure that its workers are legal. (First it had to fight off a suit by the Chamber of Commerce and industry groups that use undocumented labor.)

Meanwhile, Chuck Schumer, the New York Democrat who heads the Senate Immigration Subcommittee, is promoting biometric tools to replace the use of documents that can be counterfeited or stolen. Biometrics rely on such unique identifiers as fingerprints and the iris of the eye.

We should examine what’s really behind the right’s argument that universal health coverage would draw more illegal immigrants. It’s an assumption that if you keep America’s low-wage workers miserable enough, undocumented foreigners won’t want to join them.

That’s neither nice nor good for the country. The dirty truth is that the uninsured are not people on welfare or very poor workers. Those groups get covered by Medicaid. The uninsured are mainly struggling families who make too much to qualify for Medicaid but not enough to afford the coverage — or those rejected by private insurers because of pre-existing medical conditions.

To sum it up, the Democrats’ policies are already reining in illegal immigration, and the proposed health care reform would, if anything, contain it further. Those trying to stop reform should look elsewhere for scare tactics.

Froma Harrop is a Providence Journal columnist. Her e-mail address is fharrop@projo.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Dec. 4

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The Everett Public Library in Everett, Washington on Thursday, Jan. 19, 2023. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Editorial: What do you want and what are you willing to pay?

As local governments struggle to fund services with available revenue, residents have decisions ahead.

Burke: What will mass deportation look like in our hometowns?

The roundups of undocumented workers could thin specific workforces and disrupt local businesses.

French: Danger of Kash Patel as FBI head is loyalty to Trump

Patel wouldn’t come after criminals; he would come after those deemed disloyal or opposed to Trump.

Comment: Post-American world disorder gets jump on Trump’s return

Freed from U.S. authority, nationalists throughout the world are moving ahead with their plans.

Comment: Biden couldn’t keep personal, political separate

Unable to save his country from the return of Trump, Joe Biden saved his son from persecution.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Dec. 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Children play and look up at a large whale figure hanging from the ceiling at the Imagine Children’s Museum on Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2022 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Making your holiday shopping count for even more

Gifts of experiences can be found at YMCA, Village Theatre, Schack and Imagine Children’s Museum.

Stephens: Biden’s pardon of son a disgrace and a betrayal

Biden’s action to protect his son from consequences proves what Trump’s supporters believed all along.

French: Welcome stranger in by supporting homeless outreach

Feeding and sheltering those in need won’t alone fix homelessness, but it builds relationships that can.

Comment: Bipartisanship’s prospects, advantages to be tested

In Minnesota and D.C., lawmakers may find that little will get done without some give and take.

FILE — Bill Nye, the science educator, in New York, March 5, 2015. Nye filed a $37 million lawsuit against Disney and its subsidiaries on Aug. 25, 2017, alleging that he was deprived of extensive profits from his show “Bill Nye, the Science Guy,” which ran on PBS from 1993 to 1998. (Jake Naughton/The New York Times)
Editorial: What saved climate act? Good sense and a Science Guy

A majority kept the Climate Commitment Act because of its investments, with some help from Bill Nye.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.