Examples against are entirely true

In response to Mr. Mark Bothwell’s letter on I-594, “Examples against entirely untrue”: The writer should not play an attorney, on TV, the editorial pages, or anywhere else.

He claims this recent example is dishonest or ignorantly misrepresents I-594: “If father and son go out shooting, simply allowing the other to try out your firearm will make you and whom ever receives it a felon…” He counters with, “the initiative specifically allows transfer of a firearm ‘to a person who is under 18 years of age…”

Well, he seems to have forgotten that sons and daughters don’t stop at age 18. My children range in age from 14 to 19, and yes, handing a gun to my older children under some circumstances will make me a felon under I-594. Why does anyone think it’s OK to discriminate against my family?

Mr. Bothwell gives several convoluted “outs” to background checks on gun transfers under I-594, then goes on boldly to say, “you may allow another to shoot your gun anywhere that shooting is legal.” I-594 most certainly does not state that! Its patchwork of exceptions leaves many situations where shooting is legal, but transfers are not. Anyone who would give such a falsehood is more interested in their anti-gun political agenda than the rights and legal protections of the law-abiding gun owner.

Alexander Jankovic

Arlington

Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Jan. 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Supporters march Wednesday afternoon across from Providence Medical Center in Everett on May 5, 2021. (Kevin Clark / The Herald)
Editorial: Nurses, health care workers need better support

Setting staffing levels at hospitals, however, may not address a shortage of available nurses.

Jeff Thoreson cheers with his students after his class wins a tug-o-war game on Thursday, June 17, 2021 in Snohomish, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: School levies an investment in kids, communities

Voters in several county school districts are asked to approve levies in a Feb. 8 special election.

FILE - In this file photo taken Jan. 6, 2021 at the Capitol in Olympia, Wash., two men stand armed with guns in front of the Governor's Mansion during a protest supporting President Donald Trump and against the counting of electoral votes in Washington, DC, affirming President-elect Joe Biden's victory. The open carry of guns and other weapons would be banned on the Washington state Capitol campus and at or near any public demonstration across Washington under a measure that received a remote public hearing Tuesday, Jan. 26, 2021 by the Senate Law and Justice Committee. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: Protect ballots, meetings from armed intimidation

Two proposed state laws would bar firearms possession at election offices and public meetings.

Quality education a right; vote yes on Everett school levies

My wife and I have enjoyed raising three wonderful children with one… Continue reading

Lake Stevens should not split from Sno-Isle Libraries

Lake Stevens Mayor Brett Gailey recently proposed to break ties with Sno-Isle… Continue reading

U.S. is a democratic republic

In response to a recent letter whether the United States’ form of… Continue reading

Comment: Why Biden might take some heart in his poll numbers

Policy still matters to people; better news on covid and inflation could boost his approval rating.

Comment: What ‘The Janes’ hope to remind women under 50

A new documentary describes the struggle for access to abortions before Roe v. Wade.

Most Read