Forest Service’s camera permit rule lacks focus

The time-honored edict to those who enter the wilderness is that one should “take only photographs and leave only footprints.”

The U.S. Forest Service is attempting to amend that, at least for members of the media, to “take only photographs only after having applied, paid for and received the proper permit.”

Under a rule that is to be finalized in November, journalists would have to obtain a permit — with a fee of up to $1,500 — before using a still or video camera in a Forest Service-managed wilderness area. Failure to secure the permit could result in a $1,000 fine, The Oregonian reported earlier this week. The rule has been in effect as a temporary directive for four years but has gone largely unenforced, although an Idaho public television station crew was initially denied access until Idaho’s governor and a Congress member intervened. Ironically, the Idaho station was preparing a report on the protection of wilderness areas.

The intent, the Forest Service’s acting wilderness director claims, is to protect the untamed character of wilderness areas. The National Wilderness Preservation System, established 50 years ago, now encompasses 107 million acres in 44 states, including in Snohomish County: the Glacier Peak Wilderness, the Henry M. Jackson Wilderness and the recently created Wild Sky Wilderness. Those in wilderness areas are required to travel only by foot or horseback; no motorized vehicles or tools are allowed. (The Forest Service bent those rules, itself, to renovate the historic Green Mountain Fire Lookout in the Glacier Peak Wilderness, a decision we have repeatedly supported on this page.)

The Forest Service is correct to be protective of our wilderness areas, and a case can be made for oversight of their commercial use. In 2011, a photography crew shooting a Patagonia catalog embedded climbing bolts in protected rock walls at Utah’s Capitol Reef National Park. But the rule, as the Forest Service plans to apply it, is so broad it would hamper the legitimate collection of news and is an infringement on First Amendment rights. The service’s acting director claims the permit rule would not apply to members of the media as they gather breaking news, such as wildfires or rescues, but that’s a narrow exception, particularly when it leaves out coverage that could be critical of Forest Service policy or actions. A permit for photography for such coverage can’t be left to the whim of a mid-level bureaucrat.

The rule, should it be adopted and enforced, is certain to draw a legal challenge, one that will ultimately cost taxpayers much more than the Forest Service could ever hope to recoup through its permits.

The Forest Service, which is taking comment on the proposed rule, ought to go back and refocus the language, or it may find taxpayers eager to leave a footprint in an uncomfortable place.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

July 14, 2025: New FAA Chief
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Traffic moves northbound in a new HOV lane on I-5 between Everett and Marysville on Monday, Aug. 19, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Check state’s transportation road map from now to 2050

A state commission’s Vision 2050 plan looks to guide transportation planning across the state.

Burke: Here’s a scary thought: What if Trump dies in office?

Imagine the power struggles and chaos just within the administration that would be unleashed.

Find better programs to end addiction than job training for dealers

Todd Welch’s columns are generally a source of mirth and amusement with… Continue reading

Why isn’t county’s fireworks ban being enforced?

So many of those living around us in the Meadowdale Park area… Continue reading

Comment: Can we risk putting Social Security funds in markets?

Public pension funds operate on this model. It works for Canada, too. But there are no guarantees.

Comment: Trump ignores Congress’ TikTok ban; Congress shrugs

And it’s nothing new; presidents have long taken it on themselves to enforce laws as they see fit.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, July 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Perkins, in strong field, best for Marysville council

The fifth-grade teacher hopes to improve outreach and participation with neighborhood meetings.

State should have given ferry contract to shipyard here

The state of Washington’s decision to award its newest ferry construction contract… Continue reading

Some Democrats did question Biden’s fitness to run

Recently, a letter to the editor said that Democrats would not say… Continue reading

Dowd: Trump’s good-looking Cabinet making him look bad

Trump’s toadies are keeping the truth from him and making decisions on their own that dog the president.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.