Forum: CCA had good intentions but poor outcomes for state

Initiative 2117 would repeal the act and allow a more economically balanced effort on climate change.

By Todd Welch / Herald Forum

This November, Washington voters face a critical decision on Initiative 2117, which would repeal the state’s Climate Commitment Act.

While the CCA’s goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions are laudable, the legislation has proven to be a costly and ineffective approach that burdens Washington families and businesses. Voters should support I-2117 to correct this misguided policy.

Hidden costs of good intentions: The CCA passed in 2021 and established a cap-and-invest program to reduce carbon emissions. However, its implementation has resulted in significant unintended consequences.

• Soaring fuel prices: Despite promises of minimal impact, the CCA has added an estimated 43 cents per gallon to gasoline prices and 53 cents to diesel in its first year alone. This hidden tax disproportionately affects working-class families and small businesses struggling with inflation.

• Economic burden: The program has extracted nearly $1.8 billion from Washington’s economy since its inception. This massive wealth transfer from citizens to government coffers comes when many face financial hardship.

• Minimal environmental impact: For all its costs, the CCA’s effect on global climate change is negligible. Washington state’s emissions are a tiny fraction of global output, and even drastic local reductions will have little measurable impact on climate trends.

A better path forward: Repealing the CCA through I-2117 would not mean abandoning environmental goals. Rather, it would allow Washington to pursue more effective and less economically damaging approaches to emissions reduction:

• Invest in innovation: Direct funds toward research and development of clean energy technologies that can be adopted globally.

• Improve infrastructure: Modernize the power grid and transportation systems to accommodate cleaner energy sources.

• Incentivize; don’t punish: Offer tax breaks and grants for businesses and individuals adopting low-emission technologies rather than imposing blanket taxes.

• Regional cooperation: Work with neighboring states on coordinated efforts that don’t put Washington at a competitive disadvantage.

Accountability and transparency: The CCA’s complex cap-and-invest system lacks transparency and is vulnerable to market manipulation. I-2117 would eliminate this opaque system and prevent state agencies from implementing similar programs in the future. This ensures that any future climate policies are straightforward and accountable to voters.

Washington’s attempt to lead on climate policy through the CCA has proven to be a costly experiment with dubious benefits. Initiative 2117 offers voters the chance to course-correct without abandoning environmental goals. By repealing the CCA, we can pursue more effective, economically sound strategies for addressing climate change that don’t place undue burdens on Washington families and businesses.

It’s time to admit that the CCA is not the right solution for Washington despite its good intentions. Vote yes on I-2117 to repeal this flawed legislation and pave the way for more intelligent, balanced climate policies.

Todd Welch lives in Everett.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Nov. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) on a ride-along with a Skamania County paramedic captain near Carson, Wash. on Feb. 26, 2024. Perez, who is on track to win re-election in her rural Washington district, says her party needs to stop demonizing others and recruit candidates from diverse backgrounds. (M. Scott Brauer/The New York Times)
Editorial: What Washington state’s results say about election

Both parties should consider what state voters had to say on the economy and government investments.

AquaSox centerfielder Jared Sundstrom throws the ball to a cutoff man during a game against the Vancouver Giants on une 5, at Funko Field in Everett. (Ryan Berry / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Keep AquaSox in Everett with a downtown ballpark

The school district park has served team and city well, but a new park offers economic power-hitting.

Comment: County exec’s property tax proposal poorly timed

Days after local voters rejected several tax measures, the executive seeks an 8% property tax hike.

Kristof: Democrats must return to their working-class roots

Some Democratic policy is in the interests of workers, but the party’s focus has been misdirected.

Comment: To understand why Democrats lost, look at wages

In the last 50 years, the bottom 60 percent saw their hourly wage increase only $3. Don’t count on Trump to fix that.

Comment: It’s climate crisis’ damage we don’t see that costs most

A new study says Oregon loses tens of billions of dollars each year to the routine impacts of climate change.

Comment: Trump 2.0 will be bad for climate, but it’s not hopeless

As Washington state showed in upholding cap-and-trade, climate efforts aren’t solely up to the president.

Stephens: Specter of anti-Semitic pogroms returns to Europe

Authorities have condemned attacks in Amsterdam, but it’s a reminder of why the nation of Israel exists.

Comment: U.S. economy will prove stronger than Trump’s tariffs

Even so, they will drive up prices and won’t increase U.S. manufacturing productivity a new study shows.

Comment: Democrats are in disarray with no clear path forward

How does a party chart a way out of a post-rational and polarized wilderness.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.