Gates gift doesn’t let others off global hook

When is $500 million not enough?

When 38,600,000 people are living with AIDS/HIV, 14,602,353 people are suffering from Tuberculosis, and 408,388,001 malaria victims are struggling to survive.

Bill and Melinda Gates have stood up for the world’s sick and poor once again. Last week, the Gates Foundation announced it will contribute $500 million to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria over the next five years.

The Gates grant thrilled world health advocates. But, for the Global Fund to carry out large-scale disease prevention and treatment, donor governments like the United States must take global health seriously, and donate accordingly.

The House of Representatives has set aside $450 million for the Global Fund for 2007, and the Senate has tentatively budgeted $700 million. Senate action is not yet complete – America’s contribution may still increase.

But global health experts say the United States needs to give $866 million if the Global Fund is to make good on a number of ambitious, worthy goals. Global Fund workers hope to make HIV treatment universally accessible, cut global TB deaths by half, distribute 100 million insecticide-treated malaria bed nets, educate tens of millions of people about HIV/AIDS and create a safe, effective, affordable TB vaccine.

The Global Fund, which awards grants to applicant countries and monitors work to protect against corruption, provides 20 percent of external funding for HIV/AIDS relief, two-thirds of all funding for TB malaria, and has worked with more than 130 nations.

According to Global Fund representatives, not only might congressional thrift stall global health efforts, it might also cause the situation in some countries to regress. People already being treated with Global Fund resources could be forced out of treatment, increasing drug-resistant strains.

Obviously, experts at the Gates Foundation believe the Global Fund is fighting the right fight and in desperate need of financial assistance.

“When the richest man on Earth provides such generous support the risk is that some donor government may mistakenly think they are off the hook,” said Joanne Carter of RESULTS, a nonprofit lobbying group with a chapter in Snohomish County. “The Gates’ pledge must be seen as an endorsement and a challenge to wealthy countries.”

Congress needs to meet that challenge. Every person’s life – no matter where they live, what they look like, how they dress, to whom they pray – is precious. We must provide adequate support to the Global Fund.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

November 17, 2025: But Her Emails
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Nov. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Where are cartoons lampooning Kamala Harris?

I agree with a recent letter writer, The Herald Opinion page’s cartoons… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons are satire; it’s to be expected

I have read and sent letters to the editor of The Herald… Continue reading

People should rely on own savings not on goverment assistance

Laudable is the social legislation that provides 26 weeks of subsidies to… Continue reading

Comment: What climate ‘realists’ miss are pledges’ quiet wins

Climate fatalists should consider that nations committed to reductions are meeting their targets.

Comment: Too many kids can’t read; blame lack of spelling tests

Leaving the task to spellcheck holds back kids’ skill and love of reading. Spelling is key to comprehension.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Nov. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

Comment: Ignoring Trump, stock market believes in climate crisis

Green energy and cleantech indices are outperforming the overall market. You can partially thanks AI’s demand.

Comment: Shutdown raises profile of childcare as an issue

With work requirements on or coming for SNAP and Medicaid, more families will rely on Head Start.

Saunders: Shutdown is over; recriminations for Democrats aren’t

Except for a handful of heroes, the Democrats need to explain why they put so many through this.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.