Give consumers funds to rescue the airlines

With the whole travel industry struggling, the federal government should revisit its airline-bailout package to give the public and workers a better deal.

Perhaps the government should take a cue from the tax rebate program and provide air travel vouchers directly to members of the public. Whatever the mechanism, there must be a way to ensure that the public and employees in all segments of the travel industry — from cab drivers to Boeing workers — benefit from the bailout.

Congress approved the bailout for the national good, not the welfare of airline stockholders, creditors and executives. Passed just 10 days after the Sept. 11 massacres , the package includes $10 billion for loan guarantees. An initial $5 billion in cash was to head off immediate collapse, which was critical to the entire nation.

Now, airlines are beginning to apply for loans, a process that will involve judging the strength of their business plans. And the industry is making it clear that it wants possible mergers and consolidations to be viewed in a positive light during the loan process.

Hello?

What do we think will happen with airline mergers? With less competition, won’t prices go up? Won’t the public — which is bailing out the airlines — wind up with fewer choices? And won’t the public — which the airlines are supposed to serve — either have to give up flying or pay much more for the privilege?

The board overseeing the airline loans has already said it will ask applicants whether the government — the taxpayers — will receive stock in the case of a loan default. That’s a commendable step toward requiring that taxpayers receive some of the benefits from the airline bailout, and it carries echoes of the Chrysler rescue some years ago.

The board should look for ways to go considerably farther on the public’s behalf, however. If taxpayers were given a voucher to be used against air-travel expenses, the money would get to the airlines. But vouchers would also help put money in the hands of cab drivers, hotel employees, restaurant servers and museum or theme-park workers. The same effect would also occur if, say, the federal board required loans be conditioned on airlines offering discounts to U.S. taxpayers. If an innovative approach requires congressional approval, the board should not hesitate to ask lawmakers to re-think their package.

In any case, some process that puts the money into actual air travel would spread the benefits to more sectors of the economy while doing at least as much as a straight loan for the airlines. Ultimately, that would protect jobs everywhere, including those here in airline manufacturing.

Saving jobs was the intent when Congress rescued Chrysler. That is always a worthy goal but never more so than wartime, when the country’s success rests, in part, on its ability to pull together.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

Sentencing reforms more complicated than column described

I read Todd Welch’s Jan. 29 column. He is certainly entitled to… Continue reading

President Trump running nation like his failed businesses

We’ve seen it before; President Trump will do or say anything to… Continue reading

Intent of Trump’s nominees is to subvert good government

It is clear that Donald Trump has something specific in mind with… Continue reading

Comment: Real dangers loom with Trump’s incoherent trade policy

Even if Trump could settle on a justification for his tariffs, the results could leave the country far. weaker.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Comment: Trump can go only as far as the courts will allow

Most of Trump’s executive orders are likely to face court challenges, setting the limits of presidential power.

Comment: Civil service needs reform; Trump means only to gut it

It’s too difficult to hire and fire federal workers. A grand bargain is possible, but that’s not what Trump seeks.

Saunders: U.S. Iron Dome isn’t feasible now, but it could be

Trump is correct to order a plan for a system that would protect the nation from missile strikes.

Harrop: Trump has no sense of damage from tariff threats

Even if ultimately averted, a trade war with Canada and Mexico could drive both from U.S. exports.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.